Cancer Detection Rates in a Population-Based, Opportunistic Screening Model, New Delhi, India

  • Shridhar, Krithiga (Centre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries) ;
  • Dey, Subhojit (Indian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India) ;
  • Bhan, Chandra Mohan (Indian Cancer Society) ;
  • Bumb, Dipika (Indian Cancer Society) ;
  • Govil, Jyostna (Indian Cancer Society) ;
  • Dhillon, Preet K (Centre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries)
  • Published : 2015.03.18


Background: In India, cancer accounts for 7.3% of DALY's, 14.3% of mortality with an age-standardized incident rate of 92.4/100,000 in men and 97.4/100,000 in women and yet there are no nationwide screening programs. Materials and Methods: We calculated age-standardized and age-truncated (30-69 years) detection rates for men and women who attended the Indian Cancer Society detection centre, New Delhi from 2011-12. All participants were registered with socio-demographic, medical, family and risk factors history questionnaires, administered clinical examinations to screen for breast, oral, gynecological and other cancers through a comprehensive physical examination and complete blood count. Patients with an abnormal clinical exam or blood result were referred to collaborating institutes for further investigations and follow-up. Results: A total of n=3503 were screened during 2011-12 (47.8% men, 51.6% women and 0.6% children <15 years) with a mean age of 47.8 yrs (${\pm}15.1yrs$); 80.5% were aged 30-69 years and 77.1% had at least a secondary education. Tobacco use was reported by 15.8%, alcohol consumption by 11.9% and family history of cancer by 9.9% of participants. Follow-up of suspicious cases yielded 45 incident cancers (51.1% in men, 48.9% in women), consisting of 55.5% head and neck (72.0% oral), 28.9% breast, 6.7% gynecological and 8.9% other cancer sites. The age-standardized detection rate for all cancer sites was 340.8/100,000 men and 329.8/100,000 women. Conclusions: Cancer screening centres are an effective means of attracting high-risk persons in low-resource settings. Opportunistic screening is one feasible pathway to address the rising cancer burden in urban India through early detection.


Opportunistic screening;India, cancer burden;age-standardized detection rate


  1. Adams C and Doherty RM (2014). Advocacy for Cancer control. World Cancer Report. B. W. S and C. P. W, Available at www.> Publications> Books> World Cancer Report, 2014.
  2. Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM, et al (2009). The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer, 45, 2671-8.
  3. Arnold F, Parasuraman S, Arokiasamy P, et al (2009). Nutrition in India National Family Health Survey. I. NFHS 3, 2005 06 Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro.
  4. Bhargava VL, Verma K, Sharma R, et al. (1993). A hospitalbased study on the use of paramedical personnel for clinical downstaging of cancer cervix. Indian J Med Res, 98, 65-8.
  5. Bhatla N, Dar L, Rajkumar Patro A, et al (2008). Human papillomavirus-type distribution in women with and without cervical neoplasia in north India. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 27, 426-30.
  6. Bhatla N, Gulati A, Mathur SR, et al (2009). Evaluation of cervical screening in rural North India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 105, 145-9.
  7. Bhatla N, Mukhopadhyay A, Joshi S, et al (2004). Visual inspection for cervical cancer screening: evaluation by doctor versus paramedical worker. Indian J Cancer, 41, 32-6.
  8. Bhawna G (2013). Burden of smoked and smokeless tobacco consumption in India - results from the global adult tobacco survey India (GATS-India)- 2009-201. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 3323-9.
  9. Bordoni A, Probst-Hensch NM, Mazzucchelli L, et al (2009). Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical-pathological indicators: a population-based study. Br J Cancer, 101, 1925-31.
  10. Brocklehurst P, Kujan O, Glenny AM, et al (2010). Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, 4150.
  11. Bumb D, Shridhar K, Dhillon PK, et al (2014). Oral visual examination for early detection of potentially malignant mucosal disorders in an opportunistic population. Oral Oncol, 50, 3-4.
  12. Chalkidou K, Marquez P, Dhillon PK, et al (2014). Evidenceinformed frameworks for cost-effective cancer care and prevention in low, middle, and high-income countries. Lancet Oncol, 15, 119-31.
  13. Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Ramasundarahettige C, et al (2012). Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet, 379, 1807-16.
  14. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al (2013). GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0 Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012 Available from:
  15. Krishnan S, Madsen E, Porterfield D, et al (2013). Advancing cervical cancer prevention in India: implementation science priorities. Oncologist, 18, 13-25.
  16. Kulkarni PR, Rani H, Vimalambike MG, et al (2013). Opportunistic screening for cervical cancer in a tertiary hospital in Karnataka, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 5101-5.
  17. Kumar Y, Mishra G, Gupta S, et al (2011a). Cancer screening for women living in urban slums--acceptance and satisfaction. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1681-5.
  18. Kumar YS, Mishra G, Gupta S, et al (2011b). Level of cancer awareness among women of low socioeconomic status in Mumbai slums. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1295-8.
  19. Lee HY, Park EC, Jun JK, et al (2010). Trends in socioeconomic disparities in organized and opportunistic gastric cancer screening in Korea (2005-2009). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 19, 1919-26.
  20. Madlensky L, Goel V, Polzer J, et al (2003). Assessing the evidence for organised cancer screening programmes. Eur J Cancer, 39, 1648-53.
  21. Mahal A, Karan A, Fan VY, et al (2013). The economic burden of cancers on Indian households. PLoS One, 8, 71853.
  22. Mallath MK, Taylor DG, Badwe RA, et al (2014). The growing burden of cancer in India: epidemiology and social context. Lancet Oncol, 15, 205-12.
  23. Mauad EC, Silva TB, Latorre MR, et al (2011). Opportunistic screening for skin cancer using a mobile unit in Brazil. BMC Dermatol, 11, 12.
  24. Mittra I, Mishra GA, Singh S, et al (2010). A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening. Int J Cancer, 126, 976-84.
  25. Morrison AS (1992). Screening in Chronic Disease. Oxford University Press, 3-20.
  26. Nair KS, Raj S, Tiwari VK, et al (2013). Cost of treatment for cancer: experiences of patients in public hospitals in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 5049-54.
  27. NCRP National Cancer Registry Program: Bangalore. (2013). Three year report of Population Based Cancer Registries, 2009-2011, Indian Council Med Res.
  28. Nene BM, Deshpande S, Jayant K, et al. (1996). Early detection of cervical cancer by visual inspection: a population-based study in rural India. Int J Cancer, 68, 770-3.<770::AID-IJC14>3.0.CO;2-4
  29. Pal SK and Mittal B (2004). Improving cancer care in India: prospects and challenges. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 5, 226-8.
  30. Palencia L, Espelt A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, et al (2010). Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol, 39, 757-65.
  31. Pati S, Hussain MA, Chauhan AS, et al (2013). Patient navigation pathway and barriers to treatment seeking in cancer in India: a qualitative inquiry. Cancer Epidemiol, 37, 973-8.
  32. Raj S, Piang LK, Nair KS, et al (2012). Awareness regarding risk factors, symptoms and treatment facilities for cancer in selected states of India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 4057-62.
  33. Rath GK (2014). Cancer control in India:Cancer care through a four tier system. World Cancer Report B. W. S and C. P. W, vailable at>Publications >Books>World Cancer Report 2014
  34. Samiei M (2014). Health system strengthening for cancer control. World Cancer Report. B. W. S and C. P. W, available at www.>Publications>Books>World Cancer Report 2014
  35. Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, et al (2007). Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet, 370, 398-406.
  36. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thara S, et al (2011a). Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India. J Natl Cancer Inst, 103, 1476-80.
  37. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thara S, et al (2013). Long term effect of visual screening on oral cancer incidence and mortality in a randomized trial in Kerala, India. Oral Oncol, 49, 314-21.
  38. Sankaranarayanan R, Sauvaget C, Ramadas K, et al (2011b). Clinical trials of cancer screening in the developing world and their impact on cancer healthcare. Ann Oncol, 22, 20-28.
  39. Sankaranarayanan R, Swaminathan R, Brenner H, et al (2010). Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and central America: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol, 11, 165-73.
  40. Singla S, Mathur S, Kriplani A, et al (2012). Single visit approach for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection & loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Indian J Med Res, 135, 614-20.
  41. Thomas V, Rema Devi S, Jeyaseelan V, et al (2012). Mucosal disorders with oral epithelial dysplasia risk--development of a simple screening tool for general health care setting. Oral Oncol, 48, 671-7.

Cited by

  1. Potential factors associated with clinical stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis: a case–control study vol.36, pp.1, 2017,