A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Simulation Based Education - Korean Nurses and Nursing Students -

시뮬레이션 기반 교육 효과에 대한 메타분석 - 국내 간호사와 간호대학생을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2015.04.01
  • Accepted : 2015.07.10
  • Published : 2015.08.31


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects size of simulation education targeting korean nurses and nursing students. Methods: Meta-analysis was conducted with 48 papers in domestic master and doctorate degree dissertations and academic journals from 2000 to 2014. Results: The entire effect size in simulation education was relevant to big effect size. Regarding the effect size of individual variables, nurse was identified to have biggest effect size in study subject, standardized patient was identified to have biggest effect size in simulation methods and pediatric nursing was identified to have biggest effect size in study subjects. Effect size in each effect variable was highest in psychomotor domain. Conclusion: This study identified the effect size of simulation education and provided the basic data to contribute to the quality improvement of simulation education which is based on the reasons.


  1. Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(3), 359-369.
  2. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York Longmans, Green.
  3. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-anaylsis. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
  4. Brownson, R. C., Baker, E. A., Leet, T. L., Gillespie, K. N., & True, W. R. (2011). Evidence-based public health. Oxford University Press.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  6. Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., et al. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(9), 978-988.
  7. Feingold, C. E., Calaluce, M., & Kallen, M. A. (2004). Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. The Journal of Nursing Education, 43(4), 156-64.
  8. Higgins, J, Green, S.(2011), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0, The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from
  9. Hwang, S. D. (2014). Intuitive understanding of the meta-analysis. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  10. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Hillsdale, NJ.
  11. Jang, H. J., & Kwang, Y. K. (2013). Affecting factors on clinical competence of nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 14(9), 4380-4387.
  12. Jarzemsky, P. A., & McGrath, J. (2008). Look before you leap: lessons learned when introducing clinical simulation. Nurse Educator, 33(2), 90-95.
  13. Kim, H. R., Choi, E. Y., Kang, H. Y., & Kim, S. M. (2011). The relationship among learning satisfaction, learning attitude, self-efficacy and the nursing students' academic achievement after simulation-based education on emergency nursing acre. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 17(1), 5-13.
  14. Kim, J. H. (2007). An exploration on the use of medical simulation in emergency medical technicain education. Journal of Korean of Fire Science & Engineering, 21(3), 104-112.
  15. Kim, J. H., Park, I. H., & Shin, S. J. (2013). Systemic review of Korean studies on simulation within nursing education. The Journal of Korean Academic Society Nursing Education, 19(3), 307-319.
  16. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. (2014). Accreditation assessment standards for education of Korea (the course of the nursing bachelor's degree). Seoul: Korean Nurses Association.
  17. Lasater, K. (2007). High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgement: Students' experiences. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(6), 269-276.
  18. Law, M., Stewart, D., Pollock, N., Letts, L., Bosch, J., & Westmoreland, M. (1998). Critical review form -quantitative studies. McMaster University: Ontario, Canada. Retrieved September 13, 2011 from
  19. Lee, J. M., So, H. S., Kim, Y. K., Kim, J. E., & An, M. J. (2014). The effects of high fidelity simulation-based education on clinical competence and confidence in nursing students: A systematic review. The Korea Contents Society, 14(10), 850-861.
  20. Lee, M. I. (2014). The effect of simulation-based nursing education programs: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Chonbuk National University of Korea, Chonbuk.
  21. Lee, S. E. (2001). A study on satisfaction and experience of clinical practice and direction for clinical education: Focused on maternity nursing practice. The Journal of Korean Academic of Nursing Education, 7(2), 333-348.
  22. Lim, K. C. (2011). Directions of simulation-based learning in nursing practice education: A systemic review. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 17(2), 246-256.
  23. Lofmark, A., & Wikblad, K. (2001). Facilitating and obstruction factors for development of learning in clinical practice: a student perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(1), 43-46.
  24. Marken, P. A., Zimmerman, C., Kennedy, C., Schremmer, R., & Smith, K. V. (2010). Human simulators and standardized patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(7), 120.
  25. Middleton, K. G. (2012). Clinical simulation : Designing scenarios and implementing debriefing strategies to maximize team development and student training. Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy, 48(3), 27-29.
  26. Norman, J. (2012). Systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education. Journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, 23(2), 24-28.
  27. Oh, S. S. (2007). Meta-analysis:theory and practice. Seoul: Konkuk University Press.
  28. Rauen, C. A. (2004). Simulation as a teaching strategy for nursing education and orientation in cardiac surgery. Critical Care Nurse, 24(3), 46-51.
  29. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research(Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  30. Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204-211.
  31. Yuan, H. B., Williams, B. A., Fang, J. B., & Ye, Q. H. (2012). A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Education Today, 32(3), 294-298.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Simulation with Problem-based Learning on Care for Patients with Autonomic Dysreflexia vol.20, pp.2, 2017,
  2. Effects of Maternity Nursing Simulation using High-fidelity Patient Simulator for Undergraduate Nursing Students vol.17, pp.3, 2016,