Bridge the Gap Between Local Governments and Communities: Key Factors in Generating Community Involvement in the Historic Preservation District in Japan

  • Published : 2015.02.28


Since 1795, 106 districts in Japan have been selected as Important Historic Preservation Districts (Juuyo dentouteki kenzoubutsugun hozon chiku [Juudenken]). The system for protection of cultural properties enables the local government to name a "Preservation District" and allows for the development of a preservation plan based on local ordinances. Moreover, the well-organized, bottom-up networks, which are groups for community development activities on the basis of local participation, play an important role in raising awareness and conducting several preservation projects in their own towns. This study mainly focused on cultural resources management in the local community. The system, which possibly bridged the gap between the local authorities and the community, was revealed. Fifty non-profit groups and active citizens, who were engaged in an advanced stage of community participation in Juudenken, were selected to be interviewed. The results then were analyzed using STAT program. The significant associations were shown by mapping the associations related to the public process of community involvement. Each variable had its own significant meaning and contributed credible indirect association to community involvement. The network mapping indicated that balancing the local economy and technical conservation was important in generating community involvement, which provided a model on how local authorities and communities could articulate and maintain their own cultural resources.



Supported by : SUMITOMO foundation


  1. Agency of Cultural Affairs, The. (2008). Bunkazaikenzoubutsu katsuyou tekunikarunoto [Technical note on building cultural properties utilization]. Retrieved from
  2. Agency of Cultural Affair, The. (2012). Preservation and Utilization of Cultural Properties. Retrieved from
  3. Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. Boston: American Institute of Planners. Retrieved from
  4. Asano, A. (1998). Transformation of Conservation Legislation in Japan. Research reports of the Faculty of Engineering, Mie University. 23, pp. 29-37.
  5. Kingston, J. (2013). Japan's Quiet Transformation: Social Change and Civil Society in 21st Century Japan (Asia's Transformations). US: Taylor and Francis.
  6. Nakagawa, I. (Ed). (2011). Community saisei no tame no chiikijichi no shikumi to jissen [Local Government Mechanism and Practice for Community Regeneration]. Tokyo:Gakugei.
  7. Sekine, S. (2010). Bunkazai no hogo katsuyou to senmonteki jinzai no yousei [Preservation and Practical Use of Cultural Properties and Promotion of Professional Talent]. Studies in Japanese cultural history, 41: 114.
  8. Shigeru, S. (Ed). (2011). Machidukuri shimin jigyou: atarashii kougyou ni yoru chiikisaisei [Participatory Community Development Project: Regional Regeneration by New Public]. Tokyo: Gakugei.
  9. UNESCO. (2011). A New International Instrument: the Proposed UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL). Retrieved from
  10. Zastrow H.C. (2013). The Practice of Social Work: A Comprehensive Worktext, 10th Edition. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.