A Comparative Study on the Library and Social Cataloging: Focusing on the Cataloging Rules

도서관 목록과 사회적 목록에 대한 비교 연구 - 목록규칙 분석을 중심으로 -

  • 백지원 (숭의여자대학교 문헌정보과)
  • Received : 2015.11.25
  • Accepted : 2015.12.11
  • Published : 2015.12.30


The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current and overall situation of cataloging ecosystem focusing on the interrelationship between traditional library and social cataloging site cataloging. For this, an extensive research and analysis was conducted concerning comparative analysis on cataloging rules of the library and social cataloging. As a result, not only the similarity and difference but also interrelationship between library and social cataloging was analyzed in detail. In addition, the characteristics of the cataloging rules were analyzed by the stage of cataloging in the library and the social cataloging environment. This study provides implications for mutual understanding and cooperation between library and social cataloging. The result may have significant meaning in prospecting cataloging ecosystem and planning further study on facilitating interaction and leading knowledge organization development.


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. 김정현. 2013. 한국목록규칙의 개정 방향에 대한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(4): 123-143.
  2. 박진희. 2009a. "RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(1): 317-338.(Park, Jin-Hee. 2009a. "A Study on Movements to Establish RDA and Its Contents Structure."Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 40(1): 317-338.)
  3. 박진희. 2009b. "RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(2): 111-138.(Park, Jin-Hee. 2009b. "Comparative Analysis on Descriptive Rules of RDA and KCR4." Journalof Korea Library and Information Science Society, 40(2): 111-138.)
  4. 안서현, 이창수. 2014. 목록규칙에 있어 개인의 속성과 관계의 기술에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 25(3): 235-261.(Ahn, Seohyeon and Changsoo Lee. 2014. "A Study on the Describing Attributes and Relationshipsof Person in Cataloging Rules." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society For Library AndInformation Science, 25(3): 235-261.)
  5. 이경호. 2012. "RDA에 나타난 이용자 과업에 대한 연구." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(1): 99-122.(Lee, Kyung-Ho. 2012. "A Study on the User Task in Resource Description & Access." Journalof Korea Library and Information Science Society, 43(1): 99-122.)
  6. 이미화. 2011a. "AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구." 정보관리학회지, 28(1): 23-42.(Lee, Mihwa. 2011a. "A Study on Considerations in KCR4 through Changes of Cataloging Rulesfrom AACR2 to RDA." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management,28(1): 23-42.)
  7. 이미화. 2011b. "RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구." 정보관리학회지, 28(3): 103-121.(Lee, Mihwa. 2011b. "A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4." Journalof the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3): 103-121.)
  8. 이미화. 2012. 국제목록원칙 2009 제정에 따른 한국목록규칙의 방향성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(2): 261-280.(Lee, Mihwa. 2012. "The Study on the Directions of KCR4 under the New ICP 2009." Journalof the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2): 261-280.)
  9. 이미화, 현문수. 2015. RDA 테스트 분석을 통해 본 한국목록규칙의 테스트 방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(1): 155-176.(Lee, Mihwa and Moonsoo Hyun. 2015. "A Study on Testing the Korean Cataloguing Rulesthrough Analyzing the RDA Test." Journal of Korean Library and Information ScienceSociety, 46(1): 155-176.)
  10. 이성숙. 2008. "대학도서관 폭소노미 태그의 형태적 특성에 관한 연구." 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4): 463-480.(Lee, Sung-Sook. 2008. "A Study on Form of Folksonomy Tags in University Libraries." Journalof the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4): 463-480.)
  11. American Library Association & Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2014. RDA: Resource Description & Access. Chicago, Ill.: American Library Association.
  12. Goodreads. 2015a. "Books with multiple authors." [online]. [cited 2015.11.14]. .
  13. Goodreads. 2015b. "About Goodreads Librarians." [online]. [cited 2015.8.5]. .
  14. Harej, Viktor and Maja Zumer. 2013. "Analysis of FRBR user tasks." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(7): 741-759.
  15. Hider, Philip and Ying-Hsang Liu. 2013. "The Use of RDA elements in support of FRBR user tasks." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(8): 857-872.
  16. Joseph, Deodato. 2014. "The patron as producer: libraries, web 2.0, and participatory culture." Journal of Documentation, 70(5): 734-758.
  17. Librarything. 2014. Common Knowledge. "Formatting rules and usage guidelines." [online]. [cited 2015.2.21]. .
  18. Librarything. 2015. "HelpThing:Work/Relationships." [online]. [cited 2015.1.15]. .
  19. Librarything. 2015. "LibraryThing gets work-to-work relationships!." [online]. [cited 2015.5.20]. .
  20. Librarything. 2015. "WikiThing." [online]. [cited 2015.5.20]. .
  21. Primary Research Group. "The survey of academic library cataloging practices. 2013 Edition." pp. 68-69. [online]. [cited 2013.5.4]. .
  22. RDA Committee of Principals. 2014. "RDA Governance Review. A discussion document." [online]. [cited 2015.9.26]. .
  23. Spalding, Tim. 2006. "Is your OPAC fun?" [online]. [cited 2015.4.11]. .
  24. Spalding, Tim. 2007. "Common Knowledge: Rules!" [online]. [cited 2015.9.20]. .
  25. Spalding, Tim. 2008. "Common Knowledge: Names, Relationships and Events." [online]. [cited 2015.9.20]. .
  26. Spanhoff, Elisabeth de Rijk. 2002. "Principle issues: catalog paradigms, old and new." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 35(1/2): 37-59.
  27. Svenonius, Elaine. 2000. The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  28. Taniguchia, Shoichi. 2013. "User tasks in the RDA-based model." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(7): 788-815.