Effect of Seeding Method and Pre-emergence Herbicides on Plant Growth and the Production of Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrid

파종 방법과 토양처리용 제초제 처리가 수수 × 수단그라스 교잡종의 생육 및 생산성에 미치는 영향

  • Jung, Jeong Sung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Won (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Ki Choon (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ji, Hee Jung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Hyung Soo (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Won Ho (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Young-Jin (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang Hak (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2015.02.16
  • Accepted : 2015.03.10
  • Published : 2015.03.31


The following experiments were used to evaluate the effect of seeding method and pre-emergence herbicides on weed control and the production of the $sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ [sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] hybrid under field and in vitro conditions. Under the in vitro condition, we evaluated how different kinds of herbicides affect the rate of seed germination and the growth of early seedlings in the $sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ hybrid treated with herbicides. Simazine, alachlor, and methabenzthiazuron were used, and their concentration levels were 0%, 40%, 70%, and 100%. The germination ratio of the seeds was reduced by the application of simazine, methabenzthiazuron, and alachlor compared with the control (distilled water). The alachlor application severely decreased the sorghum germination ratio. However, seed germination was not greatly influenced by the concentration level of the herbicides. Root and shoot length were increased in the following order: control > simazine > methabenzthiazuron > alachlor. Overall, alachlor significantly reduced root length more than shoot length. The differential tolerance of the $sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ hybrid to pre-emergence herbicides by seeding method was then tested under the field condition. The plants were severely injured by the alachlor application, leading to a great reduction in the number of stems. However, for the simazine and methabenzthiazuron applications the number of stems lost was slightly lower than it was for the alachlor and simazine + alachlor applications. In the seeding method, drilling was more effective in reducing herbicide injury than broadcasting. All of the herbicides effectively controlled weeds. The simazine and methabenzthiazuron applications showed a significantly higher dry matter (DM) yield. However, the alachlor and simazine + alachlor applications severely reduced the DM yield. This result suggests that the alachlor application has a significant effect on plant production. Similarly, the total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield was greatly reduced by the alachlor and simazine + alachlor applications. From the results presented above, we concluded that the yield of DM was the highest for broadcasting with no herbicide. and drilling was the most-effective way to reduce herbicide injury. The simazine application was the most-effective herbicide, showing the highest forage yield and TDN yield.


Grant : 하계사료작물 생산성 향상 재배기술개발

Supported by : 농촌진흥청


  1. Burnside, O. and Wicks, G. 1969. Influence of weed competition on sorghum growth. Weed Science: 332-334.
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. Vol. I. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA.
  3. Dar, W.D., Reddy, B., Gowda, C. and Ramesh, S. 2006. Genetic resources enhancement of ICRISAT-mandate crops. Current Science 91:880-884.
  4. Feltner, K., Hurst, H. and Anderson, L. 1969. Tall waterhemp competition in grain sorghum. Weed Science: 214-216.
  5. Fenoll, J., Flores, P., Hellin, P., Hernandez, J. and Navarro, S. 2014. Minimization of methabenzthiazuron residues in leaching water using amended soils and photocatalytic treatment with $TiO_2$ and ZnO. J Environ Sci (China) 26:757-764.
  6. Goering, H. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC: 1-20.
  7. Heege, H. 1993. Seeding methods performance for cereals, rape, and beans. Transactions of the ASAE (USA).
  8. Holland, C., Kezar, W., Kautz, W.P., Lazowski, E.J., Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Desmoines, IA.
  9. Ferrell, J.A., MacDonald, G.E. and Brecke2. B.J. 2007. weed management in sorghum. FLORIDA FORAGE.
  10. Ketchersid, M. and Merkle, M. 1981. The effect of CGA-43089 on absorption and metabolism of metolachlor in grain sorghum. Abstr. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer.
  11. Ketchersid, M., Norton, K. and Merkle, M. 1981. Influence of soil moisture on the safening effect of CGA-43089 in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Science: 281-287.
  12. Kim, J.D., Kwon, C.H., Kim, H.J., Park, J.G., Lee, B.S., Bing, G.S., et al. 2002. Comparison of agronomic characteristics hybrid. J. Korean Grassl. Sci. 22:297-302.
  13. Korea Crop Protection Association. 2012. Agrochemicals use guide book.
  14. LeBaron, H.M., Mc Farland, J. and Burnside, O. 2011. The triazine herbicides Elsevier.
  15. Lee, S.S. and Choi, S.J. 1989. Tolerance of corn, sorghum, sorghumsudangrass hybrid, and pearl millet to simazine and alachlor. Korean J. Crop Sci. 34: 113-119.
  16. Lim, S.H. and Kim, D.A. 1983. Effect of Seeding Rate and Herbicides on the Yield and Weed Control of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid (Sorghum bicolr (L.) Moench). J. Korean Grassl. Sci. 4: 62-69.
  17. Moore, J. 1970. Procedures for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forages. Nutrition research techniques for domestic and wild animals. Utah state Univ. 1: 5001-5003.
  18. O, S.M. and Han, H.J. 1993. Effect of chemical control of weed on upland fields in forage crop. RDA Annual Reports : 235-246.
  19. Pyon, J.Y. and Kim, T.H. 1983. Response of barley cultivars to butachlor, terbutryn, and methabenzthiazuron. Korean Journal of weed science 3:100-104.
  20. Quinby, J.R. 1974. Sorghum improvement and the genetics of growth. TX: Texas A&M University Press.
  21. RDA. 2012. Investigation and analysis of research and technology in agriculture.
  22. SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System Version. 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  23. Seo, S. and Kim, D.A. 1984. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and cutting management on the carbohydrate reserves, regrowth, and dry matter yield of sorghm-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) for forage production. IV. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and cutting stage on the dead stubble, carbohydrate reserves, and dry matter yield of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Han'guk Ch'uksan Hakhoe chi = Korean journal of animal sciences. J. Korean Grassl. Sci. 26(1):88-94.
  24. Shakoor, A., Islam, S. and Naeem, M. 2000. Efficacy of different herbicides for control of weeds in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under rainfed conditions. Pak J Biol Sci 3:463-465.
  25. Tilley, J. and Terry, R. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage science 18: 104-111.
  26. Wilkinson, R. 1981. Metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamide] inhibition of gibberellin precursor biosynthesis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 16: 199-205.
  27. Wilkinson, R. 1982. alachlor influence on sorghum growth and gibberellin precursor synthesis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 17:177-184.
  28. Yoana, N., John, E., Wilfred, V. and David, W. 2010. Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor): Overview and Management1. FLORIDA FORAGE: 65.

Cited by

  1. Evaluating the Adsorption Potential of Alachlor and Its Subsequent Removal from Soils via Activated Carbon vol.27, pp.4, 2018,