Immune Responses in Broiler Chicks Fed Propolis Extraction Residue-supplemented Diets

  • Eyng, C. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringa) ;
  • Murakami, A.E. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringa) ;
  • Santos, T.C. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringa) ;
  • Silveira, T.G.V. (Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringa/UEM) ;
  • Pedroso, R.B. (Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringa/UEM) ;
  • Lourenco, D.A.L. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringa)
  • Received : 2014.01.27
  • Accepted : 2014.08.23
  • Published : 2015.01.01


This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of inclusion of propolis extraction residue in the feed of broilers from 1 to 21 d of age on phagocytic activity of macrophages, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity response to phytohemagglutinin, antibody production against Newcastle disease, lymphoid organ weight and hematological profile and to determine the optimal level of inclusion. 120 chicks, reared in metabolism cages until 21 days of age, were distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4% of propolis residue) and six replications. The relative weight of thymus and monocyte percentage were affected by propolis residue, with a quadratic response (p<0.05) and lowest values estimated at 2.38% and 2.49%, respectively. Changes in relative weight of cloacal bursa and spleen, percentage of lymphocyte, heterophil, basophil, eosinophil, and heterophil:lymphocyte ratio, antibody production against Newcastle disease, phagocytic activity of macrophages and the average number of phagocytosed erythrocytes were not observed. The nitric oxide production with regard to positive control (macrophages+erythrocytes) decreased linearly (p<0.05) with increased doses of propolis residue. The remaining variables of nitric oxide production (negative control - macrophages, and difference between the controls) were not affected by propolis residue. The cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity response to phytohemagglutinin as determined by the increase in interdigital skin thickness exhibited a quadratic response (p<0.05), which predicted a lower reaction response at a dose of 2.60% of propolis residue and highest reaction response after 43.05 hours of phytohemagglutinin injection. The inclusion of 1% to 4% of propolis extraction residue in broiler diets from 1 to 21 days of age was not able to improve the immune parameters, despite the modest changes in the relative weight in thymus, blood monocyte percentage, nitric oxide concentration, and interdigital reaction to phytohemagglutinin.


  1. Abd El-Motaal, A. M., A. M. H. Ahmed, A. S. A. Bahakaim, and M. M. Fathi. 2008. Productive performance and immunocompetence of commercial laying hens given diets supplemented with eucalyptus. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7:445-449.
  2. Ansorge, S., D. Reinhold, and U. Lendeckel. 2003. Propolis and some of its constituents down-regulate DNA synthesis and inflammatory cytokine production but induce TGF-${\beta}1$ production of human immune cells. Z. Naturforsch. 58:580-589.
  3. Abdel-Fattah, S. A., M. H. El-Sanhoury, N. M. El-Mednay, and F. Abdel-Azeem. 2008. Thyroid activity, some blood constituents, organs morphology and performance of broiler chicks fed supplemental organic acids. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7:215-222.
  4. Abioja, M. O., K. B. Ogundimu, T. E. Akibo, K. E. Odukoya, O. O. Ajiboye, J. A. Abiona, T. J. Williams, E. O. Oke, and O. A. Osinowo. 2012. Growth, mineral deposition, and physiological responses of broiler chickens offered honey in drinking water during hot-dry season. Int. J. Zool. Article ID 403502. doi:10.1155/2012/403502.
  5. Apata, D. F. 2009. Antibiotic resistance in poultry. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 8:404-408.
  6. Casewell, M., C. Friis, E. Marco, P. McMullin, and I. Phillips. 2003. The European ban on growth-promoting antibiotics and emerging consequences for human and animal health. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:159-161.
  7. Cetin, E., S. Silici, N. Cetin, and B. K. Guclu. 2010. Effects of diets containing different concentrations of propolis on hematological and immunological variables in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 89:1703-1708.
  8. Cooper, M. D., D. A. Raymond, R. D. Peterson, M. A. South, and R. A. Good. 1966. The functions of the thymus system and the bursa system in the chicken. J. Exp. Med. 123:75-102.
  9. Corrier, D. E. and J. R. Deloach. 1990. Evaluation of cellmediated, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by an interdigital skin test. Poult. Sci. 69:403-408.
  10. Eyng, C., A. E. Murakami, R. B. Pedroso, T. G. V. Silveira, D. A. L. Lourenco, and A. F. Q. M. Garcia. 2013a. Crude propolis as an immunostimulating agent in broiler feed during the starter phase. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias 34:2511-2522.
  11. Fischer, G., N. Paulino, M. C. Marcucci, B. S. Siedler, L. S. Munhoz, P. F. Finger, G. D. Vargas, S. O. Hubner, T. Vidor, and P. M. Roehe. 2010. Green propolis phenolic compounds act as vaccine adjuvants, improving humoral and cellular responses in mice inoculated with inactivated vaccines. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 105:908-913.
  12. Eyng, C., A. E. Murakami, C. R. A. Duarte, and T. C. Santos. 2013b. Effect of dietary supplementation with an ethanolic extract of propolis on broiler intestinal morphology and digestive enzyme activity. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 98:393-401.
  13. Fan, Y., L. Yu, W. Deyun, J. Liu, X. Song, W. Zhang, X. Zhao, T. L. Nguyen, and Y. Hu. 2013. Effect of epimedium polysaccharide-propolis flavone immunopotentiator on immunosuppression induced by cyclophosphamide in chickens. Cell. Immunol. 281:37-43.
  14. Fasina, Y. O., H. L. Classen, J. D. Garlich, B. L. Black, P. R. Ferket, Z. Uni, and A. A. Olkowski. 2006. Response of Turkey poults to soybean lectin levels typically encountered in commercial diets. 2. Effect on intestinal development and lymphoid organs. Poult. Sci. 85:870-877.
  15. Galal, A., A. M. Abd El-Motaal, A. M. H. Ahmed, and T. G. Zaki. 2008. Productive performance and immune response of laying hens as affected by dietary propolis supplementation. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7:272-278.
  16. Hegazi, A., A. M. Abdou, and F. A. Allah. 2012. Egyptian propolis 9- Its effect on chicken productivity and immune response against Newcastle disease vaccine. Br. Poult. Sci. 3:25-30.
  17. Hu F., H. R. Hepburn, Y. Li, M. Chen, S. E. Radloff, and S. Daya. 2005. Effects of ethanol and water extracts of propolis (bee glue) on acute inflammatory animal models. J. Ethnopharmacol. 100:276-83.
  18. John, J. L. 1994. The avian spleen: A neglected organ. Q. Rev. Biol. 69:327-351.
  19. Kwak, H., R. E. Austic, and R. R. Dietert. 1999. Influence of dietary arginine concentration on lymphoid organ growth in chickens. Poult. Sci. 78:1536-1541.
  20. Kabir, S. M. L., N. M. Rahman, M. B. Rahman, M. M. Rahma, and S. U. Ahmed. 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3:361-364.
  21. Konjufca, V. K., W. G. Bottje, T. K. Bersi and G. F. Erf. 2004. Influence of dietary Vitamin E on phagocytic functions of macrophages in broilers. Poult. Sci. 83:1530-1534.
  22. Kosalec I., S. Pepeljnjak, M. Bakmaz and S. Vladimir-Knezevic. 2005. Flavonoid analysis and antimicrobial activity of commercially available propolis product. Acta Pharm. 55:423-430.
  23. Liu, X., J. A. Byrd, M. Farnell, and C. A. Ruiz-Feria. 2014. Arginine and vitamin E improve the immune response after a Salmonella challenge in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 93:882-890.
  24. Lofty, M. 2006. Biological activity of bee propolis in health and disease. Asian Pac. J. Cancer. Prev. 7:22-31.
  25. Lucas, A. M. and C. Jamroz. 1961. Atlas of Avian Hematology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.
  26. Makram, A., A. Galal, M. M. Fathi, and A. H. El-Attar. 2010. Carcass characteristics and immunocompetence parameters of four commercial broiler strain chickens under summer season of Egypt. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9:171-176.
  27. Moore, C. B. and T. D. Siopes. 2002. Effect of melatonin supplementation on the ontogeny of immunity in the large white turkey poult. Poult. Sci. 81:1898-1903.
  28. Nassar, S. A., A. H. Mohamed, H. Soufy, S. M. Nasr, and K. M. Mahran. 2012. Immunostimulant effect of Egyptian propolis in rabbits. Sci. World J. Article ID 901516 doi:10.1100/2012/901516
  29. Qureshi, M. A., R. R. Dieteri, and L. D. Bacon. 1986. Genetic variation in the recruitment and activation of chicken peritoneal macrophages. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 181:560-568.
  30. Olugbemi, T. S., S. K. Mutayoba, and F. P. Lekule. 2010. Effect of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) inclusion in cassava based diets fed to broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9:363-367.
  31. Orsi, R. O., S. R. C. Funari, A. M. V. C. Soares, S. A. Calvi, S. L. Oliveira, J. M. Sforcin, and V. Bankova. 2000. Immunomodulatory action of propolis on macrophage activation. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 6:205-219.
  32. Pierpoint, W. S. 2004. The extraction of enzymes from plant tissues rich in phenolic compounds. Methods Mol. Biol. 244:65-74.
  33. R Development Core Team. 2007. Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
  34. Rostagno, H. S., L. F. T. Albino, J. L. Donzele, P. C. Gomes, R. F. Oliveira, D. C. Lopes, A. S. Ferreira, and S. L. T. Barreto. 2005. Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine: Composition of Feedstuffs and Nutritional Requirements. Vicosa, MG: UFV, Departamento de Zootecnia, Brazil. 186 p.
  35. SAEG. 1997. Statistical Analysis System and Genetics - SAEG. Stat. version 8.0. Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  36. Salatino, A., C. C. Fernandes-Silva, A. A. Righi, and M. L. F. Salatino. 2011. Propolis research and the chemistry of plant products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 28:925-936.
  37. Salim, H. M., H. K. Kang, N. Akter, D. W. Kim, J. H. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. C. Na, H. B. Jong, H. C. Choi, O. S. Suh, and W. K. Kim. 2013. Supplementation of direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population, and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 92:2084-2090.
  38. Singleton, V. L. and J. A. Rossi Jr. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics whit phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16:144-158.
  39. Schnitzler, P., A. Neuner, S. Nolkemper, C. Zundel, H. Nowack, K. H. Sehsch, and J. Reichling. 2010. Antiviral activity and mode of action of propolis extracts and selected compounds. Phytother. Res. 24:S20-S28.
  40. Sforcin, J. M. 2007. Propolis and the immune system: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 113:1-14.
  41. Shalmany, S. K. and M. Shivazad. 2006. The effect of diet propolis supplementation on ross broiler chicks performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5:84-88.
  42. Toghyani, M., M. Tohidi, A. A. Gheisari, and S. A. Tabeidian. 2010. Performance, immunity, serum biochemical and hematological parameters in broiler chicks fed dietary thyme as alternative for an antibiotic growth promoter. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9:6819-6825.
  43. Trusheva, B., M. Popova, V. Bankova, S. Simova, M. C. Marcucci, P. L. Miorin, F. R. Pasin, and I. Tsvetkova. 2006. Bioactive constituents of Brazilian red propolis. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 3:249-254.
  44. Wagh, V. D. 2013. Propolis: A wonder bees product and its pharmacological potentials. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. Article ID 308249 doi: 10.1155/2013/308249.
  45. Woisky, R. G. and A. Salatino. 1998. Analysis of propolis: some parameters and procedures for chemical quality control. J. Agric. Res. 37:99-105.
  46. Ziaran, H. R., H. R. Rahmani, and J. Pourreza. 2005. Effect of dietary oil extract of propolis on immune response and broiler performance. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 8:1485-1490.

Cited by

  1. Recent Advances in Role of Propolis as Natural Additive in Poultry Nutrition vol.61, pp.2, 2017,
  2. Effects of raw propolis or water and ethanol extracts of propolis on performance, immune system, and some blood parameters of broiler breeders vol.47, pp.0, 2018,