Seismic performance evaluation of moment frames with slit-friction hybrid dampers

  • Lee, Joonho (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jinkoo (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2014.07.04
  • Accepted : 2015.07.21
  • Published : 2015.12.25


This study investigates the seismic energy dissipation capacity of a hybrid passive damper composed of a friction and a hysteretic slit damper. The capacity of the hybrid device required to satisfy a given target performance of a reinforced concrete moment resisting frame designed with reduced design base shear is determined based on the ASCE/SEI 7-10 process, and the seismic performances of the structures designed without and with the hybrid dampers are verified by nonlinear dynamic analyses. Fragility analysis is carried out to investigate the probability of a specified limit state to be reached. The analysis results show that in the structure with hybrid dampers the residual displacements are generally reduced and the dissipated inelastic energy is mostly concentrated on the dampers. At the Moderate to Extensive damage states the fragility turned out to be smallest in the structure with the hybrid dampers.


Supported by : Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport


  1. ACI Committee 318 (2011), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary.
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10): Reston.
  3. Aydin, E., Boduroglub, M.H. and Guney, D. (2007), "Optimal damper distribution for seismic rehabilitation of planar building structures", Eng. Struct., 29(2), 176-185.
  4. Bergman, D.M. and Goel, S.C. (1987), Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel plate devices for added damping and stiffness, Report no. UMCE87-10. The University of Michigan.
  5. Blau, P. (2001), Compositions, functions, and testing of friction brake materials and their additives, Technical Report ORNL/TM-2001/64, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
  6. Chan, R.W.K. and Albermani, F. (2008), "Experimental study of slit damper for passive energy dissipation", Eng. Struct., 30(4), 1058-1066.
  7. Celik, O.C. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2009), "Seismic risk assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames subjected to Mid-America ground motions", J. Struct. Eng., 135(4), 414-424.
  8. Chen, C.-S., Chen, K.-C., Pong, W.S. and Tsai, C.S. (2002), "Parametric study for buildings with combined displacement-dependent and velocity-dependent energy dissipation devices", Struct. Eng. Mech., 14(1), 85-98.
  9. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2006), "Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 304-311.
  10. Choi, K.S. and Kim, H.J. (2014), "Strength demand of hysteretic energy dissipating devices alternative to coupling beams in high-rise buildings", Int. J. High-Rise Build., 3(2), 107-120
  11. Damptech (2014), Friction Dampers-Capacities and Dimensions.
  12. Kim, J., Park, J. and Kim, S.D. (2009), "Seismic behavior factors of buckling-restrained braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 33(3), 261-284.
  13. Kim, J., Choi, H. and Min, K. (2011), "Use of rotational friction dampers to enhance seismic and progressive collapse resisting capacity of structures", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(4), 515-537.
  14. Lee, S.K., Park, J.H., Moon, B.W., Min, K.W., Lee, S.H. and Kim, J. (2008), "Design of a bracing-friction damper system for seismic retrofitting", Smart Struct. Syst., 4(5), 685-696.
  15. Marshall, J.D. and Charney, F.A. (2012), "Seismic response of steel frame structures with hybrid passive control systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(4), 715-733.
  16. Murakami, Y., Noshi, K., Fujita, K., Tsuji, M. and Takewaki, I. (2013), "Simultaneous optimal damper placement using oil, hysteretic and inertial mass dampers", Earthq. Struct., 5(3), 261-276.
  17. Oh, S.H., Kim, Y.J. and Ryu, H.S. "Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers", Eng. Struct., 31(9), 1997-2008.
  18. Patel, C.C. and Jangid, R.S. (2011), "Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction dampers", Earthq. Struct., 2(2), 149-169.
  19. Perform 3D (2006), Computer and Structures, Inc. PERFORM User Guide ver 4.
  20. Suresh, G. and Andy, R. (1991), "Planar sliding with dry friction Part 2. Dynamics of motion", Wear, 20(2), 331-352.
  21. Tsai, C.S., Chen, K.-C. and Chen, C.-S. (1998), "Seismic resistibility of high-rise buildings with combined velocity-dependent and velocity-independent devices", ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, San Diego, CA.
  22. Tremblay, R., Chen, L. and Tirca, L. (2014), "Enhancing the seismic performance of multi-storey buildings with a modular tied braced frame system with added energy dissipating devices", Int. J. High-Rise Build., 3(1), 21-33.
  23. Uetani, K., Tsuji, M. and Takewaki, I. (2003), "Application of optimum design method to practical building frames with viscous dampers and hysteretic dampers", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 579-592.

Cited by

  1. Seismic retrofit design method using friction damping systems for old low- and mid-rise regular reinforced concrete buildings vol.146, 2017,
  2. Magneto-rheological and passive damper combinations for seismic mitigation of building structures vol.11, pp.6, 2016,
  3. Seismic loss assessment of a structure retrofitted with slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.130, 2017,
  4. Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.136, 2017,
  5. Development of box-shaped steel slit dampers for seismic retrofit of building structures vol.150, 2017,
  6. Life-cycle cost evaluation of steel structures retrofitted with steel slit damper and shape memory alloy–based hybrid damper pp.2048-4011, 2018,