Towards achieving the desired seismic performance for hybrid coupled structural walls

  • Hung, Chung-Chan (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University) ;
  • Lu, Wei-Ting (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University)
  • Received : 2015.04.01
  • Accepted : 2015.08.09
  • Published : 2015.12.25


It is widely recognized that the preferred yielding mechanism for a hybrid coupled wall structure is that all coupling beams over the height of the structure yield in shear prior to formation of plastic hinges in structural walls. The objective of the study is to provide feasible approaches that are able to promote the preferred seismic performance of hybrid coupled walls. A new design methodology is suggested for this purpose. The coupling ratio, which represents the contribution of coupling beams to the resistance of system overturning moment, is employed as a fundamental design parameter. A series of nonlinear time history analyses on various representative hybrid coupled walls are carried out to examine the adequacy of the design methodology. While the proposed design method is shown to be able to facilitate the desired yielding mechanism in hybrid coupled walls, it is also able to reduce the adverse effects caused by the current design guidelines on the structural design and performance. Furthermore, the analysis results reveal that the state-of-the-art coupled wall design guidelines could produce a coupled wall structure failing to adequately exhaust the energy dissipation capacity of coupling beams before walls yield.


Supported by : Ministry of Science and Technology


  1. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2011), Manual of Steel Construction, AISC, Chicago, USA.
  2. Aristizabal-Ochoa, J.D. (1987), "Seismic behavior of slender coupled wall systems", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 113(10), 2221-2234.
  3. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (2010), SEI/ASCE 7-10: Minimum Design Loads For Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
  4. American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318 (2014), ACI 318 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (318-14) ACI-318, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  5. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2010), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, Chicago, IL, USA.
  6. Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2004), CSA A23.3-04 Design of Concrete Structures, Rexdale, Canada.
  7. Chaallal, O., Gauthier, D. and Malenfant, P. (1996), "Classification methodology for coupled shear walls", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(12), 1453-1458.
  8. Cheng, M., Fikri, R. and Chen, C. (2015), "Experimental study of reinforced concrete and hybrid coupled shear wall systems", Eng. Struct., 82, 214-225.
  9. El-Tawil, S. and Kuenzli, C.M. (2002), "Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. Part II: Analysis and behavior", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 128(10), 1282-1289.
  10. El-Tawil, S., Harries, K.A., Fortney, P.J., Shahrooz, B.M. and Kurama, Y. (2010), "Seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems-state-of-the-art", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 136(7), 755-769.
  11. FEMA-356 (2000), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  12. FEMA-450 (2003), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and other Structures, BSSC, Washington, DC, USA.
  13. Gong, B. and Shahrooz, B.M. (2001), "Steel-concrete composite coupling beams-behavior and design", Eng. Struct., 23(11), 1480-1490.
  14. Harries, K.A. (2001), "Ductility and deformability of coupling beams in reinforced concrete coupled walls", Earthq. Spectra, 17(3), 457-478.
  15. Harries, K.A., Fortney, P., Shahrooz, B.M. and Brienen, P. (2005), "Design of practical diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams-a critical review of ACI 318 requirements", ACI Struct. J., 102(6), 876-882.
  16. Harries, K.A., Gong, B. and Shahrooz, B.M. (2000), "Behavior and design of reinforced concrete, steel, and steel-concrete coupling beams", Earthq. Spectra, 16(4), 775-799.
  17. Harries, K.A., Mitchell, D., Cook, W.D. and Redwood, R.G. (1993), "Seismic response of steel beams coupling concrete walls", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 119(12), 3611-3629.
  18. Harries, K.A., Moulton, D. and Clemson, R. (2004), "Parametric study of coupled wall behavior-implications for the design of coupling beams", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130(3), 480-488.
  19. Hu, H.S., Nie, J. and Eatherton, M.R. (2014), "Internal force and deformation of concrete-filled steel plate composite coupling beams", J. Constr. Steel Res., 92, 150-163.
  20. Hung, C. (2010), "Computational and hybrid simulation of high performance fiber reinforced concrete coupled wall systems", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  21. Hung, C. and El-Tawil, S. (2011), "Seismic behavior of a coupled wall system with HPFRC materials in critical regions", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 137(2), 1395-1636.
  22. Hung, C. and Su, Y. (2013), "On modeling coupling beams incorporating strain-hardening cement-based composites", Comput. Concrete, 12(4), 243-259.
  23. Kent, D.C. and Park, R. (1971), "Flexural members with confined concrete", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 97(ST7), 1969-1990.
  24. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826.
  25. Lequesne, R.D., Parra-Montesinos, G.J. and Wight, J.K. (2013), "Seismic behavior and detailing of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete coupling beams and coupled wall systems", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 139(8), 1362-1370.
  26. Massone, L.M., Bonelli, P., Lagos, R., Luders, C., Moehle, J. and Wallace, J.W. (2012), "Seismic design and construction practices for RC structural wall buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 28(S1), S245-S256.
  27. New Zealand Standards Association (NZS) (1995), NZS 3101: Concrete Structures Standard, New Zealand.
  28. Nie, J.G., Hu, H.S. and Eatherton, M.R. (2014), "Concrete filled steel plate composite coupling beams: Experimental study", J. Constr. Steel Res., 94, 49-63.
  29. OpenSees version 2.4 User Manual (2013), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley,
  30. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992), Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, Wiley, New York, USA.
  31. Paulay, T. and Santhakumar, A.R. (1976), "Ductile behavior of coupled shear walls", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 102(ST1), 93-108.
  32. Shahrooz, B.M., Remetter, M.E. and Qin, F. (1993), "Seismic design and performance of composite coupled walls", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 119(11), 3291-3309.
  33. U.S.-Japan Planning Group (1992), "Recommendations for U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research Program, Phase 5-Composite and Hybrid Structures", Report No. UMCEE 92-29, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  34. Wallace, J.W., Massone, L.M., Bonelli, P., Dragovich, J., Lagos, R., Luders, C. and Moehle, J. (2012), "Damage and implications for seismic design of RC structural wall buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 28(S1), S281-S299.

Cited by

  1. A Performance-Based Design Method for Coupled Wall Structures vol.21, pp.4, 2017,
  2. Tall Hybrid Coupled Structural Walls: Seismic Behavior and Design Suggestions 2017,
  3. High-strength steel reinforced squat UHPFRC shear walls: Cyclic behavior and design implications vol.141, 2017,