DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Four Polymorphisms in the Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) Gene and Lung Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis

  • Bu, Zhi-Bin (Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital) ;
  • Ye, Meng (Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital) ;
  • Cheng, Yun (Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital) ;
  • Wu, Wan-Zhen (Department of Psychiatry, Zhejiang Hospital)
  • Published : 2014.07.30

Abstract

Background: Previous published data on the association between CYP1A2 rs762551, rs2069514, rs2069526, and rs2470890 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk have not allowed a definite conclusion. The present meta-analysis of the literature was performed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. Materials and Methods: 8 publications covering 23 studies were selected for this meta-analysis, including 1,665 cases and 2,383 controls for CYP1A2 rs762551 (from 8 studies), 1,456 cases and 1,792 controls for CYP1A2 rs2069514 (from 7 studies), 657 cases and 984 controls for CYP1A2 rs2069526 (from 5 studies) and 691 cases and 968 controls for CYP1A2 rs2470890 (from 3 studies). Results: When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis for the CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism, significantly increased lung cancer risk was observed in the dominant model (OR=1.21, 95 % CI=1.00-1.46). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk of lung cancer was observed in Caucasians (dominant model: OR=1.29, 95%CI=1.11-1.51; recessive model: OR=1.33, 95%CI=1.01-1.75; additive model: OR=1.49, 95%CI=1.12-1.98). There was no evidence of significant association between lung cancer risk and CYP1A2 rs2069514, s2470890, and rs2069526 polymorphisms. Conclusions: In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that the CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism is linked to an increased lung cancer risk in Caucasians. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for rs2069514 associations in lung cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the rs2069514 polymorphism in lung cancer development.

References

  1. Aklillu E, Carrillo JA, Makonnen E, et al (2003). Genetic polymorphism of CYP1A2 in Ethiopians affecting induction and expression: characterization of novel haplotypes with single-nucleotide polymorphisms in intron 1. Mol Pharmacol, 64, 659-69. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.64.3.659
  2. Aldrich MC, Selvin S, Hansen HM, et al (2009). CYP1A1/2 haplotypes and lung cancer and assessment of confounding by population stratification. Cancer Res, 69, 2340-8. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2576
  3. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
  4. Bartoli A, Xiaodong S, Gatti G, et al (1996). The influence of ethnic factors and gender on CYP1A2-mediated drug disposition: a comparative study in Caucasian and Chinese subjects using phenacetin as a marker substrate. Ther Drug Monit, 18, 586-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199610000-00011
  5. B'chir F, Pavanello S, Knani J, et al (2009). CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms and adenocarcinoma lung cancer risk in the Tunisian population. Life Sci, 84, 779-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2009.03.008
  6. Bozina N, Bradamante V, Lovric M (2009). Genetic polymorphism of metabolic enzymes P450 (CYP) as a susceptibility factor for drug response, toxicity, and cancer risk. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol, 60, 217-42.
  7. Bayram S (2014). Association between RASSF1A Ala133Ser polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 8,892 subjects. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 3691-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.8.3691
  8. Chida M, Yokoi T, Fukui T, et al (1999). Detection of three genetic polymorphisms in the 5'-flanking region and intron 1 of human CYP1A2 in the Japanese population. Jpn J Cancer Res, 90, 899-02. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00832.x
  9. Cui X, Lu X, Hiura M, et al (2012). Association of genotypes of carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes and smoking status with bladder cancer in a Japanese population. Environ. Health Prev, 18, 136-42.
  10. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials, 7, 177-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
  11. Davey SG, Egger M(1997). Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Lancet, 350, 1182.
  12. Deng SQ, Zeng XT, Wang Y, et al (2013). Meta-analysis of the CYP1A2 -163C>A polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 3155-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.5.3155
  13. Eaton DL, Gallagher EP, Bammler TK, et al (1995). Role of cytochrome P450 1A2 in chemical carcinogenesis: implications for human variability in expression and enzyme activity. Pharmacogenetics, 5, 259-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-199510000-00001
  14. Egger M, Smith DG, Schneider M, et al (1997). Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J, 315, 629-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  15. Ghotbi R, Christensen M, Roh HK, et al (2007). Comparisons of CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms, enzyme activity and the genotype-phenotype relationship in Swedes and Koreans. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 63, 537-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0288-2
  16. Gemignani F, Landi S, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, et al (2007). Development of lung cancer before the age of 50: the role of xenobiotic metabolizing genes. Carcinogenesis, 28, 1287-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgm021
  17. Gervasini G, Ghotbi R, Aklillu E, et al (2013). Haplotypes in the 5'-untranslated region of the CYP1A2 gene are inversely associated with lung cancer risk but do not correlate with caffeine metabolism. Environ Mol Mutagen, 54, 124-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21747
  18. Hecht SS (1999). Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer. Nath J Cancer Inst, 14, 1194-210.
  19. Hirschhorn JN, Lohmueller K, Byrne E (2002). A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet Med, 4, 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200203000-00002
  20. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. Br Med J, 327, 557-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  21. Higgins JPT, Green S, Collaboration C, et al (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford. 22.
  22. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 61, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20107
  23. Klug S.J (2009). TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual data from 49 studies. Lancet Oncol, 10, 772-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70187-1
  24. Kukongviriyapan V (2012). Genetic polymorphism of drug metabolizing enzymes in association with risk of bile duct cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 7-15.
  25. Liu WJ, Tan XH, Guo BP, et al (2013). Associations between RASSF1A promoter methylation and NSCLC: a metaanalysis of published data. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 3719-24. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.3719
  26. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Natl Cancer Inst, 22, 719-48.
  27. Miranda CL (2000). Prenyl flavonoids from hops inhibit the metabolic acti vation of the carcinogen ic heterocyclic amine 2-amino-3 -methylimidazo[4, 5-f]quinoline, mediated by cDNA-express ed human CYP1A2. Drug Metab Dispos, 28, 1297-302.
  28. Ma Z, Guo W, Gong T, et al (2014). CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism contributes to risk of lung cancer: a metaanalysis. Tumour Biol, 35, 2253-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1298-6
  29. Nebert DW, McKinnon RA, Puga A (1996). Human drugmetabolizing enzyme polymorphisms: effects on risk of toxicity and cancer. DNA Cell Biol, 15, 273-80. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.1996.15.273
  30. Nakajima M, Yokoi T, Mizutani M, et al (1999). Genetic polymorphism in the 5'-flanking region of humanCYP1A2 gene: effect on theCYP1A2 inducibility in humans. J Biochem, 125, 803-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022352
  31. Nebert DW, Dalton TP, Okey AB, et al (2004). Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated induction of the CYP1 enzymes in environmental toxicity and cancer. J Biol Chem, 279, 23847-50. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R400004200
  32. Nebert DW, Dalton TP (2006). The role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in endogenous signalling pathways and environmental carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer, 6, 947-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2015
  33. Osawa Y, Osawa KK, Miyaishi A, et al (2007). NAT2 and CYP1A2 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in relation to smoking status. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 8, 103-8.
  34. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al (2001). Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan. Int J Cancer, 94, 153-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.1440
  35. Pavanello S, B'chir F, Pulliero A, et al (2007). Mastrangelo G.Interaction between CYP1A2-T2467DELT polymorphism and smoking in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer, 57, 266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.04.004
  36. Pavanello S, Fedeli U, Mastrangelo G, et al (2012). Role of CYP1A2 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk in a prospective study. Cancer Genet, 205, 278-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.02.004
  37. Relling MV, Lin JS, Ayers GD, et al (1992). Racial and gender differences in N-acetyltransferase, xanthine oxidase, and CYP1A2 activities. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 52, 643-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1992.203
  38. Shimada T, Yamazaki H, Mimura M, et al (1994). Guengerich Interindividual variations in human liver cytochrome P-450 enzymes involved in the oxidation of drugs, carcinogens and toxic chemicals: studies with liver microsomes of 30 Japanese and 30 Caucasians. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 270, 414-23.
  39. Strange RC, Fryer AA (1999). The glutathione-S-transferases: influence of polymorphism on cancer susceptibility. IARC Sci Publ, 148, 231-49.
  40. Sachse C, Brockmoller J, Bauer S, et al (1999). Functional significance of a C->A polymorphism in intron of the cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 gene tested with caffeine. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 47, 445-9.
  41. Schneider J, Bernges U, Philipp M, et al (2004). CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in relation to tobacco smoking. Cancer Geno Prot, 1,189-98.
  42. Singh AP, Pant MC, Ruwali M, et al (2010). Polymorphism in cytochrome P450 1A2 and their interaction with risk factors in determining risk of squamous cell lung carcinoma in men. Cancer Biomark, 8, 351-9.
  43. Tsuchiya Y, Nakajima M, Yokoi T (2005). Cytochrome P450- mediated metabolism of estrogens and its regulation in human. Cancer Lett, 227, 115-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.007
  44. Tian Z, Li YL, Zhao L, et al (2013). Role of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism in cancer risk: Evidence from a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies. Gene, 524,168-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.038
  45. Yamazaki H, Shaw PM, Guengerich FP, et al (1998). Role of cytochromes P450 1A2 and 3A4 in the oxidation of estradiol and estrone in human liver microsomes. Chem Res Toxicol, 11, 659-65. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx970217f
  46. Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Patent ME, et al(2000). Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer, 27, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00093-8
  47. Zienolddiny S, Campa D, Lind H, et al (2008). A comrehensive analysis of phase I and phase II metabolism gene polymorphisms and risk of non-small cell lung cancer in smokers. Carcinogenesis, 29, 1164-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgn020
  48. Zhu YM, Liu JW, Xu Q,et al (2013). Pin1 promoter rs2233678 and rs2233679 polymorphisms in cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 5965-72. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.10.5965
  49. Zhenzhen L, Xianghua L, Ning S, et al (2013). Current evidence on the relationship between three polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene and the risk of cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev, 22, 607-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835f3bd2

Cited by

  1. Lack of association between polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene and risk of cancer: evidence from meta-analyses vol.16, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2096-5