DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flux Sliding-mode Observer Design for Sensorless Control of Dual Three-phase Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

  • Shen, Jian-Qing (National Key Laboratory of Vessel Integrated Power System Technology, Naval University of Engineering) ;
  • Yuan, Lei (National Key Laboratory of Vessel Integrated Power System Technology, Naval University of Engineering) ;
  • Chen, Ming-Liang (National Key Laboratory of Vessel Integrated Power System Technology, Naval University of Engineering) ;
  • Xie, Zhen (National Key Laboratory of Vessel Integrated Power System Technology, Naval University of Engineering)
  • Received : 2013.03.20
  • Accepted : 2014.05.07
  • Published : 2014.09.01

Abstract

A novel equivalent flux sliding-mode observer (SMO) is proposed for dual three-phase interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (DT-IPMSM) drive system in this paper. The DT-IPMSM has two sets of Y-connected stator three-phase windings spatially shifted by 30 electrical degrees. In this method, the sensorless drive system employs a flux SMO with soft phase-locked loop method for rotor speed and position estimation, not only are low-pass filter and phase compensation module eliminated, but also estimation accuracy is improved. Meanwhile, to get the regulator parameters of current control, the inner current loop is realized using a decoupling and diagonal internal model control algorithm. Experiment results of 2MW-level DT-IPMSM drives system show that the proposed method has good dynamic and static performances.

1. Introduction

Multi-phase motor drive system has been widely used in many applications, especially for high-power applications for their advantages compared to the standard three-phase realizations, such as lower torque pulsations, less dc-link current harmonics, reduced rotor harmonic currents, higher power per ampere ration for the same machine volume, etc. [1-4]. Among different multiphase motor drive solutions, one of the most widely discussed is the VSI fed dual threephase induction machine, having two sets of windings spatially shifted by 30 electrical degrees with isolated neutral points, and there are many literatures for induction, but relatively few research for multi-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM), especially for high-power PMSM.

In many high performance variable- speed AC motor drives, field- oriented or vector control is utilized, and rotor-position mechanical sensor is typically required in this method. However, the presence of mechanical sensor presents several drawbacks, such as increases the cost and size of motors, reduces system reliability, etc. Sensorless control technology can achieve the rotor position and speed estimation through exploiting the electrical information about the motor winding, and using a certain control algorithm, which represents the development direction of the AC motor drive system.

So far, several algorithms have been suggested in the recent literatures to estimate the rotor position and the speed of the motor. In the flux estimation methods [5], the rotor flux is estimated by using the integral of the difference between the phase voltage and stator resistance voltage, but these methods are sensitive to machine parameter changes, especially the phased resistance. Drift and saturation problems may cause the controller to lose its synchronization ability consequently, especially at low speed. To get better performance, several improvement schemes to flux estimation have been undertaken in [6-9]. However, some methods designed for surface PMSM are not used for IPMSM, due to the differences between stator inductance on d-axis and q-axis.

Sliding-mode observer (SMO) is an attractive solution compared with other algorithms due to several benefits, such as high state- estimation accuracy, excellent dynamic properties, robustness to parameter variations, and the ability to handle nonlinear system like the IPMSM very well [10-13]. In this paper, a novel equivalent flux estimation based on SMO technology is proposed for DT-IPMSM in a stationary reference frame, which also can be applied to both three-phase surface PMSM and IPMSM. To simplify the structure of the controller, an equivalent flux linkage concept is employed in this method, and the conventional switch sign function is replaced by the sigmoid function to reduce system chattering; Moreover, a minimum four current regulators are presented to obtain better control performance. Simulation and experimental results will be presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed control method.

 

2. Mathematical Mode of DT-IPMSM

Using the vector space decomposition technique [14], the machine model can be decoupled into three orthogonal subspaces, which are denoted as (α, β), (z1, z2) and (o1, o2). For machines with distributed windings, only (α, β) components contributed to the useful electromechanical energy conversion, whereas (z1, z2) and (o1, o2) components only produce losses. An amplitude invariant decoupling transformation is used as

Transformation (1) is the Clark’s matrix for DT-IPMSM motor, (o1, o2) components are omitted from the consideration since the machine has two isolated neutral points. A rotational transformation is applied next to transform the (α, β) components into a synchronously rotating reference frame (d, q), which is suitable for field oriented vector control, i.e.,

The circuit equation of DT-IPMSM on the d-q rotating coordinate and (z1, z2) coordinate are given respectively by

where, [ud uq]T voltage on the d-q rotating frame; [id iq]T current on the d-q rotating frame; [iz1 iz2]T current on the z1-z2 frame; [Ld Lq]T stator inductance on the d-q rotating frame; Lz stator leakage inductance; R stator resistance; p=d/dt differential operator ωe angular velocity at electrical angle; ψf PM flux linkage

Transforming (3) into stationary reference frame α-β axis, (5) is derived

where, [uα uβ]T is the stator voltage on the α-β axes, [iα iβ]T is the stator current on the α-β axes, and with

Lα = L0 + L1 cos2θe, Lβ = L0 - L1 cos2θe, Lαβ = L1 sin 2θe, L0 = (Ld + Lq) / 2, L1 = (Ld - Lq) / 2.

Eq. (5) contains 2θe term, which is not easy for mathematical process. To eliminate the 2θe term, term, the impedance matrix is rewritten symmetrically like

where, is defined as equivalent flux linkage.

The circuit equation on the on the α-β axis can be derived as (7)

where, θe is the rotor position in electrical radians, the PM flux linkage ψα,β projected onto the α-β axis can be represented as

From the new model (7)-(8), the DT-IPMSM can be described by a linear state equation as (9). Here, the state variables are stator current i and PM flux linkage ψ . Assuming that the electrical system’s time constant is smaller enough than the mechanical one, i.e., the velocity ωe is regarded as a constant parameter.

The W2 term in (9) is linearization error, this term appears only when id or iq is changing. However, under the velocity control this happens in a very short time because of the high response of the current control loop. Besides, the proposed SMO has an embedded low-pass filter which can cut off the effect of W2 .

 

3. Flux Sliding-mode Observer Design

3.1 Design of the observer

To achieve the flux linkage ψ, the proposed observer as (10) is designed based on the stator current model (9).

where, “^” denotes the estimated quantities, sgn(⋅) is the sign function, K is the designed parameter, and the (10) is the conventional SMO. To reduce the chattering phenomenon, the sign function is replaced by a continuous function, i.e., the sigmoid function, which is defined as

Here, a is a positive constant that can be adjusted the slope of the sigmoid function. And then, the SMO can be rewritten as

Assuming that the motor parameters R, Ld and Lq exist parameter errors, defined as follows

where, “^” denotes the estimated quantities, ΔR, ΔLd and ΔLq are the stator resistance error, the d-q inductance errors, respectively.

Considering the parameter variations of the motor, the observer (12) can be equivalent to

where, W1 is the parameter error input matrix, defined as follows

with

and K is the designed constant parameter, satisfies

The sliding hyper-plane is defined upon the stator current, i.e., s = [sα sβ]T = - i = 0. So the stator current estimation error dynamic function can be obtained from (9) and (14) as follows

where, ‘~’ denotes the estimated error, such as

3.2 Lyapunov stability analysis

In order to prove the stability of the designed observer, the following Lyapunov function candidate is considered.

Differentiating (18) with respect to time and substituting (17) into it, then the following equation is obtained

Assuming that max(||W1α||, ||W1β|| ) < k′, the equation (19) can be given as

According to the Lyapunov stability theory, (20) must be obeyed to guarantee that the observer is stable, i.e., < 0 , the parameter k1 can be chosen as

Hence, V decays to zero, then and are equal to zero. After sliding-mode motion occurs, i.e., , the followings equation can be obtained from (17).

The flux linkage estimation error dynamic function can be obtained from (9) and (14) as follows

Substituting (22) into (23), then the following equation is obtained

Hence, if only the parameter k2 is a positive gain, the (24) ensures the errors converge to zero, and the convergence rate of error dynamic is determined by k2 . However, when ωe is close to zero, the computed parameter may become ill-conditioned. To avoid this undesirable effect, we choose the observer poles as k2 = γ||ωe||; hence the observer gain is calculated as

3.3 Estimation of speed and position

Conventionally, the rotor position can be estimated by using arc-angent function

However, the existence of noise and harmonics may influence the accuracy of the position estimation, especially at very low-speed, the obvious estimation error may occur using the arc-angent function. To improve the position estimation for mitigation of the adverse influence, a phase-locked loop (PLL) method is employed. This scheme can be comparatively represented as a simple linearized closed-loop system shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.Scheme of position estimation through PLL

As shown in Fig. 1, after the normalization of the flux linkage, the equivalent position error signal can be expressed as

The estimation of the electrical angular speed of the rotor is obtained using PI controller, i.e.,

where, the nonnegative gains kp and ki are selected as [15]

where, a is the design parameter.

 

4. Current Control of DT-IPMSM

From the model of the DT-IPMSM, it seems that the two current loop control techniques of the three-phase motors can be easily extended to the six-phase drives, as depicted in Fig. 2. The phase currents are applied to the transformation matrix (1) to obtain the stator current components in the stationary (α, β) reference frame. The (d, q) current components in the synchronous reference frame are obtained by using a rotor position from the flux SMO. The outputs of the PI current regulators, after an inverse Park transformation, are the stator voltage reference components in stationary reference frame (α, β) to be applied to the SVPWM modulator.

Fig. 2.The conventional two current loop controls for DT-IPMSM

The two current loop control strategy depicted in Fig. 2 is very simple, but it is not able to compensate for the inherent asymmetries of the drive. Due to the small asymmetries in the stator windings and supply voltages, the two sets of three-phase stator currents have rather different amplitudes depending on the operational conditions, and the harmonic currents in (z1, z2) subsystem is not eliminated effectively. To obtain better controller performance, a current control technology with four current loop regulators in (d, q) and (z1, z2) subsystems are adopted in this paper. Moreover, in order to overcome the current coupling terms on (d, q) subsystem, the decoupling and diagonal internal model control (DIMC) [8, 16] structure for current control in the drive. The command voltage are now given by

where, β is the desired closed-up bandwidth as determined by the specified rise time of the current controller. The DIMC involves only a single parameter, so tuning of the controller to give specified performance is easier. The speed controller outputs the q-axis current reference iq* , and the z1-axis and z2-axis current references iz1* and iz2* are set to zero, so the overall block diagram of the DT-IPMSM control scheme can be shown in Fig. 3.

To obtain better results and implement simply, it is suggested in this paper the dual three-phase SVPWM technique as shown in Fig. 4 is used for modulation in this paper, the detailed discussion can be seen in [17]. It is has many advantageous, such as existing algorithms and tested three-phase modulation methods can be effectively utilized, which can save time and trouble. It also makes the method computationally efficient since years of extensive study and wide usage have made space vector modulation a very simple task.

Fig. 3.Block diagram of the sensorless flux SMO control drive scheme

Fig. 4.The dual three-phase space vector classification PWM technique

 

5. Simulation and Experiment Results

To check the feasibility of the proposed rotor position and speed estimation schemes, the simulation and experimental studies are carried out with a reference to a 2 MW DT-IPMSM drives system. The block diagram of the sensorless flux observer control drives is presented in Fig. 5, and the machine parameters are given in Table 1. The same controller parameters are used both in simulation and experimental results. A stator current controller bandwidth β of 30rad/s, and the PLL system bandwidth a of 3rad/s are chosen. The parameters of flux observer are chosen as followings: k1 + k′ = 300, Ld ⋅ γ = 50.

Table 1.the parameters of DT-IPMSM

5.1 Simulation results

Figs. 5 and 6 show the two sets of simulation waveforms when the reference speed is a step signal. In the simulation, the reference speed is changed from 5 to 17 r/min, and the load torque is 5.6 × 105 N.m.

Fig. 5.The simulation waveforms obtained by the conventional SMO method using sign function:(a) Actual and estimated speeds; (b) Actual rotor position, estimated rotor position, and estimated error; (c) Estimated flux ψα,β.

Fig. 6.The Simulation waveforms obtained by the conventional method using sign function: (a) Actual and estimated speeds; (b) Actual rotor position, estimated rotor position, and estimated error; (c) Estimated flux ψα,β.

Fig. 5 displays the simulation waveform obtained by the conventional SMO method using a sign function. Fig. 6 shows the simulation waveform obtained by the method proposed in this paper. It can be seen from Figs. 5 that the sign function can cause to chattering phenomenon, the low pass filter and phase compensation part must be used, and therefore, the rotor position estimation accuracy is not high. However, it can be seen from Fig. 6 that the chattering phenomenon of the estimated rotor position and speed is reduced, and the accuracy of rotor position estimation is improved to some extent.

Fig. 7 shows the estimation performance of the proposed method when the parameters of DT-IPMSM vary. In the simulation, the reference speed is 17 r/min, and the load torque is 5.6 × 105 N m. It can be seen from Fig. 7 that, when the resistance or the inductance of the motor changes, the estimated speed can still converge to the actual value, which verifies the robustness of the proposed approach.

Fig. 7.Simulation waveforms when the parameters of DT-IPMSM are changed: (a) Waveforms when the resistance is changed; (b) Waveforms when the inductance is changed.

5.2 Experiment results

The effectiveness of the proposed sensorless control scheme for 2 MW-level DT-IPMSM drive is tested using the experiment setup shown in Fig. 8. In the experiment setup, a high-power back-to-back converter system is used to feed the drive system, and the controller and machine parameters are same with the simulation, and the sampling period of the control system is set as 50μs, the dead-time is set as 10μs, the switch frequency is set as 1kHz. The overall system control algorithm is developed in Matlab/ Simulink, followed by implementation on an OPAL RT-Lab (Real-time Digital Simulator) controller board. The motor parameters are given in Table 1.

Fig. 8.The overall experiment setup

Figs. 9 and 10 show the control performance when the DT-IPMSM is running with the reference speed steps up from 2 to 10 r/min. Fig. 9 shows the waveforms when the conventional method based on the sign function and lowpass filter is adopted. As can be seen from Fig. 9, due to the use of the sign function, the chattering of the estimated rotor position and speed obtained by the traditional method is significant.

Fig. 9.Operating waveforms obtained by the conventional control method using a sign function: (a) From top to bottom are the estimated rotor speed, rotor error and estimated flux-linkage, respectively; (b) From top to bottom are the estimated rotor position, and estimated error, respectively.

Fig. 10.Operating waveforms obtained by the proposed method using a sigmoid function: (a) From top to bottom are the estimated rotor speed, rotor error and estimated flux-linkage, respectively; (b) From top to bottom are the estimated rotor position, and estimated error, respectively.

When the proposed flux SMO is employed, Fig. 10 presents a good dynamic performance of estimated speed, the estimated speed follows the reference speed very well, and the speed estimated error is very small. Especially, there is a small ripple (±0.1r/min) when DT-IPMSM drive runs in a stable speed range. And the chattering is reduced when the sign function is replaced by the sigmoid function, and the waveforms of the estimated rotor position and speed obtained by the proposed flux SMO are smooth.

 

6. Conclusion

In this paper, a novel flux linkage sliding-mode observer for DT-IPMSM sensorless drives has been proposed. To simply the machine model, an equivalent flux linkage concept is employed. The sign function is replaced by the sigmoid function to reduce the chattering, and the conventional SMO is improved. From the design process we can see that the presented observer has a simple structure with less control parameters. Meanwhile, the details of the observer parameters and the rotor position and speed estimators are given. The feasibility of the proposed scheme is verified and confirmed through simulation and extensive experiments.

References

  1. G. K. Singh, K. Nam, and S. K. Lim, "A simple indirect field-oriented control scheme for multiphase induction machine," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. vol. 52, pp. 1177-1184, August. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2005.851593
  2. R. Bojoi, M. lazzari, F. Profumo, and A. Tenconi, "Digital field-oriented control for dual three-phase induction motor drives," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. vol. 39, pp. 752-759, May/June. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2003.811790
  3. E. Levi, "Multiphase electric machines for variablespeed applications," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, pp. 1893-1908, May. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.918488
  4. E. Levi, R. Bojoi, F. Profumo, H. A. Toliyat, and S. Williamson," Multi- phase induction motor drives - a technology status review," IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 1, pp.489-516, July. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa:20060342
  5. R. Wu, and G. Slemon, "A permanent magnet motor drive without a shaft sensor," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 27, pp. 1005-1011, May. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.90359
  6. S. Shinnaka. "New sensorless vector control using minimum-order flux state observer in a stationary reference frame for permanent-magnet synchronous motors," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr., vol. 53, pp. 388- 398, April. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2006.870729
  7. L. Yuan, F. Xiao. J Q Shen,etc, "Sensorless control of high- power interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives at very low speed," IET Electrical power & Applications, vol. 7, pp. 199-206, April. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2012.0103
  8. Su Jianyong, Li Tiecai, Yang Guijie. PMSM sensorless control based on four-order hybrid sliding mode observer [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 24, pp. 98-103, 2009.
  9. Chan T F, Wang W, Borsje P, etc. Sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor drives using a reduced-order rotor flux observer [J]. IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 2, pp. 88-98, 2007.
  10. Z. Xu, M. F. Rahman, "An adaptive sliding stator flux observer for a direct-torque-controlled IPM synchronous motor drive" IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr., vol. 54, pp. 2398-2406, Oct. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2007.900328
  11. Yuan Lei, Shen Jian-qing, Xiao Fei, etc. Nonsingular terminal sliding-mode observer design for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drive at very low-speed [J]. Acta Physiac Sinica, vol. 7, pp. 030501, 2013.
  12. Z. Chen, M. Tomita, S. Doki, and S. Okuma, "The pole assignment of adaptive sliding observers for BLM's sensorless control," in Nat. Conv. Rec. IEEJ, vol. 4, pp. 286-287, Mar. 1998.
  13. G. Foo ,and M. F. Rahman, " sensorless sliding-mode MTPA control of an IPMSM synchronous motor drive using a sliding-mode observer and HF signal injection," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, pp. 1270-1278, April. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2030820
  14. Y. Zhao, and T. A. Lipo, "Space vector PWM control of dual three-phase induction machine using vector space decomposition," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 31, pp. 1100-1109, Sep./Oct. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.464525
  15. L. Harnefors and H. P. Nee, "A general algorithm for speed and position estimation of AC motors," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr., vol. 47, pp. 77-83, February. 2000.
  16. L. Harnefors, and H. P. Nee, "Model-based current control of AC machines using the internal model control method," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 34, pp. 133-141, Jar./ Feb. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.658735
  17. R. Bojoi, A. Tenconi, F. Profumo, G. Griva, and D. Martinello, "Complete analysis and comparative study of digital modulation techniques for dual three-phase AC motor drives," in Proc. IEEE PESC'02, pp. 851-857, 2002.

Cited by

  1. Modeling and Inner–Outer Decoupling of Dual-Rotor Machines for Continuous Variable Transmission Systems vol.64, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2703661
  2. Online Parameter Identification for Model-Based Sensorless Control of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine vol.32, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2016.2598731