- Volume 15 Issue 5
DOI QR Code
Performance of Siriraj Liquid-Based Cytology: a Single Center Report Concerning over 100,000 Samples
- Sangkarat, Suthi (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
- Laiwejpithaya, Somsak (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
- Rattanachaiyanont, Manee (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
- Chaopotong, Pattama (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
- Benjapibal, Mongkol (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
- Wongtiraporn, Weerasak (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
- Laiwejpithaya, Sujera (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
- 발행 : 2014.03.01
Background: To evaluate the performance of Siriraj liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical neoplasia screening after increasing use of this technology. Materials and Methods: Cytological reports of 103,057 Siriraj-LBC specimens obtained in 2007-2009 were compared with those of 23,676 specimens obtained in 2006. Results: Comparing with the year 2006, the 2007-2009 patients were slightly older (
- Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM (2003). Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gynecol Oncol, 90, 137-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00176-8
- Bales CE (2006). Laboratory techniques. In 'Koss' diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases 5th ed', Eds Koss LG and Melamed MR. Philadelphia, Lippincott William & Wilkins, p. 569-622.
- Beerman H, van Dorst EB, Kuenen-Boumeester V, et al (2009). Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. Gynecol Oncol, 112, 572-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.012
- Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, et al (1998). Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol, 42, 189-97. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331545
- Canda MT, Demir N, Sezer O, et al (2009). Clinical results of the liquid-based cervical cytology tool, Liqui-PREP, in comparison with conventional smears for detection of squamous cell abnormalities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 10, 399-402.
- Castle PE, Bulten J, Confortini M, et al (2010). Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials. BJOG, 117, 1067-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02650.x
- Davey DD, Naryshkin S, Nielsen ML, et al (1994). Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors. Diagn Cytopathol, 11, 390-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840110416
- Diaz-Rosario LA, Kabawat SE (1999). Performance of a fluidbased, thin-layer papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening population in New England. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 123, 817-21.
- Dupree WB, Suprun HZ, Beckwith DG, et al (1998). The promise and risk of a new technology: The Lehigh Valley Hospital's experience with liquid-based cervical cytology. Cancer, 84, 202-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980825)84:4<202::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-O
- Fremont-Smith M, Marino J, Griffin B, et al (2004). Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study. Cancer, 102, 269-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20599
- Laiwejpithaya S, Rattanachaiyanont M, Benjapibal M, et al (2008). Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 9, 575-80.
- Laiwejpithaya S, Benjapibal M, Wongtiraporn W, et al (2009). Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 147, 201-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.002
- Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, et al (1997). Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thinlayer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol, 90, 278-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00228-7
- Nandini NM, Nandish SM, Pallavi P, et al (2012). Manual liquid based cytology in primary screening for cervical cancer - a cost effective preposition for scarce resource settings. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 3645-5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.8.3645
- Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St John TL (1998). Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont. Acta Cytol, 42, 203-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331547
- Ruengkhachorn I, Laiwejpithaya S, Leelaphatanadit C, et al (2012). Clinicopathologic importance of women with squamous cell carcinoma cytology on Siriraj liquid-based cervical cytology. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 4567-70. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.9.4567
- Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al (2002). The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA, 287, 2114-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114
- World Health Organization (2012) GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012.
- Wright TC, Kurman RJ, Ferenczy A (2002). Precancerous lesions of the cervix. In 'Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 5th ed', Ed RJ K. New York, Springer Verlag, 253-324.
- Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance in Detecting Preinvasive Cervical Lesions in Post-Menopausal Turkish Women vol.15, pp.16, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.16.6639
- Comparison of Siriraj liquid-based solution and standard transport media for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in cervical specimens vol.90, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25259