DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Women Infant and Children program participants' beliefs and consumption of soy milk : Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

  • Received : 2012.09.13
  • Accepted : 2013.12.20
  • Published : 2014.01.25

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) variables predict soy milk intake in a sample of WIC participants in 2 Illinois counties (n = 380). A cross-sectional survey was used, which examined soy foods intake, behavioral beliefs, subjective norms, motivation, and intention. Soy product intake was low at both sites, and many participants (40%) did not know that soy milk was WIC approved. Most (> 70%) wanted to comply with their health care providers, but didn't know their opinions about soy milk (50-66%). Intention was significantly correlated with intake (0.507, P ${\leq}$ 0.01; 0.308, P ${\leq}$ 0.05). Environmental beliefs (0.282 and 0.410, P ${\leq}$ 0.01) and expectancy beliefs (0.490 and 0.636, P ${\leq}$ 0.01) were correlated with intention. At site 1, 30% of the variance in intention to consume soy milk was explained by expectancy beliefs and subjective norm beliefs (P < 0.0001); at site 2, 40% of the variance in intention was explained by expectancy beliefs. The TPB variables of expectancy beliefs predicted intention to consume soy milk in WIC participants. Therefore, knowing more about the health benefits of soy and how to cook with soy milk would increase WIC participants' intention to consume soy milk. Positive messages about soy milk from health care providers could influence intake.

References

  1. Oliveira V, Frazão E. The WIC Program Background, Trends, and Economic Issues, 2009 Edition. Economic Research Report Number 73. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture; 2009.
  2. Kim CI, Lee Y, Kim BH, Lee HS, Jang YA. Development of supplemental nutrition care program for women, infants and children in Korea: NutriPlus. Nutr Res Pract 2009;3:171-9. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2009.3.3.171
  3. Suitor CW; Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board; National Academies Press (US). Planning a WIC Research Agenda: Workshop Summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011.
  4. Institute of Medicine, Committee to Review the WIC Food Packages (US). WIC Food Packages: Time for a Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2006.
  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Agriculture (US). Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2005.
  6. Zhao Y, Martin BR, Weaver CM. Calcium bioavailability of calcium carbonate fortified soymilk is equivalent to cow's milk in young women. J Nutr 2005;135:2379-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.10.2379
  7. Matthews VL, Knutsen SF, Beeson WL, Fraser GE. Soy milk and dairy consumption is independently associated with ultrasound attenuation of the heel bone among postmenopausal women: the Adventist Health Study-2. Nutr Res 2011;31:766-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.09.016
  8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (US). Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soy Protein and Coronary Heart Disease [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 1999 Oct 26 [cited 2012 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1999-10-26/pdf/ 99-27693.pdf.
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (US). Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21: Food and Drugs [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2011 [cited 2012 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/ cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=101.82.
  10. Food Research and Action Center (US). New WIC Food Packages Proposed [Internet]. Washington D.C.: Food Research and Action Center; 2006 [cited 2012 Feb 21]. Available from: http://frac.org/new-wic-food-packages-proposed/
  11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (US). Special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children (WIC): revisions in the WIC food packages; interim rule. Fed Regist 2007;72:68965-9032.
  12. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Chicago (IL): Dorsey Press; 1988.
  13. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  14. Patch CS, Tapsell LC, Williams PG. Overweight consumers' salient beliefs on omega-3-enriched functional foods in Australia's Illawarra region. J Nutr Educ Behav 2005;37:83-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60020-1
  15. Robinson R, Smith C. Integrating issues of sustainably produced foods into nutrition practice: a survey of Minnesota Dietetic Association members. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;103:608-11. https://doi.org/10.1053/jada.2003.50113
  16. Pawlak R, Connell C, Brown D, Meyer MK, Yadrick K. Predictors of multivitamin supplement use among African-American female students: a prospective study utilizing the theory of planned behavior. Ethn Dis 2005;15:540-7.
  17. Verbeke W, Vackier I. Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 2005;44:67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006
  18. Eto K, Koch P, Contento IR, Adachi M. Variables of the Theory of Planned Behavior are associated with family meal frequency among adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011;43:525-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.05.010
  19. Rah JH, Hasler CM, Painter JE, Chapman-Novakofski KM. Applying the theory of planned behavior to women's behavioral attitudes on and consumption of soy products. J Nutr Educ Behav 2004;36:238-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60386-2
  20. Li S, Camp S, Finck J, Winter M, Chapman-Novakofski K. Behavioral control is an important predictor of soy intake in adults in the USA concerned about diabetes. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2010;19:358-64.
  21. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  22. Wenrich TR, Cason KL. Consumption and perceptions of soy among low-income adults. J Nutr Educ Behav 2004;36:140-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60151-6
  23. Black MM, Hurley KM, Oberlander SE, Hager ER, McGill AE, White NT, Quigg AM. Participants' comments on changes in the revised special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children food packages: the Maryland food preference study. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109:116-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.016
  24. Ritchie LD, Whaley SE, Spector P, Gomez J, Crawford PB. Favorable impact of nutrition education on California WIC families. J Nutr Educ Behav 2010;42:S2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.014
  25. Lee MJ, Park OJ. Soy food intake behavior by socio-demographic characteristics of Korean housewives. Nutr Res Pract 2008;2:275-82. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2008.2.4.275
  26. Pawlak R, Colby S, Herring J. Beliefs, benefits, barriers, attitude, intake and knowledge about peanuts and tree nuts among WIC participants in eastern North Carolina. Nutr Res Pract 2009;3:220-5. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2009.3.3.220
  27. Fung EB, Ritchie LD, Walker BH, Gildengorin G, Crawford PB. Randomized, controlled trial to examine the impact of providing yogurt to women enrolled in WIC. J Nutr Educ Behav 2010;42: S22-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.009
  28. Nolan-Clark DJ, Neale EP, Probst YC, Charlton KE, Tapsell LC. Consumers' salient beliefs regarding dairy products in the functional food era: a qualitative study using concepts from the theory of planned behaviour. BMC Public Health 2011;11:843. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-843
  29. Lv N, Brown JL. Impact of a nutrition education program to increase intake of calcium-rich foods by Chinese-American women. J Am Diet Assoc 2011;111:143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.005
  30. Provencher V, Polivy J, Herman CP. Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more! Appetite 2009;52:340-4.
  31. Schyver T, Smith C. Reported attitudes and beliefs toward soy food consumption of soy consumers versus nonconsumers in natural foods or mainstream grocery stores. J Nutr Educ Behav 2005;37:292-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60159-0
  32. Illinois Department of Human Services (US). WIC Program Illinois Authorized WIC Food List [Internet]. Springfield (IL): Illinois Department of Human Services; 2013 [cited 2013 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.peoriacounty.org/download?path =/pcchd/IllinoisWICFoodList.pdf.
  33. Illinois Department of Human Services (US). WIC Formula and Medical Nutritional Prescriptions [Internet]. Springfield (IL): Illinois Department of Human Services; 2013 [cited 2013 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.dhs.state.il.us/page.aspx?item= 45972.
  34. National Cancer Institute; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health (US). Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. NIH Publication No. 05-3896 [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2005 Sep [cited 2013 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.cancer. gov/cancertopics/cancerlibrary/theory.pdf.

Cited by

  1. Development of an Evidence-Informed Blog to Promote Healthy Eating Among Mothers: Use of the Intervention Mapping Protocol vol.6, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.7147
  2. Dietary Pattern, Hypertension and Cognitive Function in an Older Population: 10-Year Longitudinal Survey vol.6, pp.2296-2565, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00201