DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Particulates Containing Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials in Phosphate Processing Facility

인광석 취급 산업체에서 발생하는 천연방사성물질 함유 입자의 특성 평가

  • Received : 2013.12.05
  • Accepted : 2014.01.27
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

Phosphate rock, phosphogypsum, and products in phosphate processing facility contain naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). Therefore, they may give rise to enhanced radiation dose to workers due to inhalation of airborne particulates. Internal dose due to particle inhalation varies depending on particle properties. The objective of the present study was to characterize particle properties at the largest phosphate processing facility in Korea. A cascade impactor was employed to sample airborne particulates at various processing areas in the plant. The collected samples were used for characterization of particle size distribution, particle concentration in the air, and shape analysis. Aerodynamic diameters of airborne particulates ranged 0.03-100 ${\mu}m$ with the highest concentration at the particle size range of 4.7-5.8 ${\mu}m$ (geometric mean = 5.22 ${\mu}m$) or 5.8-9.0 ${\mu}m$ (geometric mean = 7.22 ${\mu}m$). Particle concentrations in the air varied widely by sampling area up to more than two orders of magnitude. The large variation resulted from the variability of mechanical operations and building ventilations. The airborne particulates appeared as spheroids or rough spherical fragments across all sampling areas and sampled size intervals. Average mass densities of phosphate rocks, phosphogypsums, and fertilizers were 3.1-3.4, 2.1-2.6, and 1.7 $gcm^{-3}$, respectively. Radioactivity concentration of uranium series in phosphate rocks varied with country of origin, ranging 94-866 $Bqkg^{-1}$. Among the uranium series, uranium was mostly concentrated on products, including phosphoric acid or fertilizers whereas radium was concentrated on byproducts or phosphogypsum. No significant radioactivity of $^{226}Ra$ and $^{228}Ra$ were found in fertilizer. However, $^{40}K$ concentration in fertilizer was up to 5,000 Bq $g^{-1}$. The database established in this study can be used for the accurate risk assessment of workers due to inhalation of airborne particles containing NORM. In addition, the findings can be used as a basic data for development of safety standard and guide and for practical radiation safety management at the facility.

References

  1. 생활주변방사선 안전관리법, [시행 2012. 7.26] [법률 제10908호, 2011. 7.25, 제정]
  2. Kim KP, Wu CY, Birky BK, Bolch WE. TENORM aerosols in the Florida Phosphate Industry - assessment of lung fluid solubility and annual effective dose to workers. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2007;123(1):41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl083
  3. Kim KP, Wu CY, Birky BK, Bolch WE. Influence of particle size distribution on inhalation doses to workers in the Florida Phosphate Industry. Health Phys. 2006;91(1):58-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000200261.96014.6c
  4. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication 66. Oxford; Pergamon Press. 1994.
  5. Dorrian MD, Bailey MR. Particle size distributions of radioactive aerosols measured in work places. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 1995;60(2):119-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082709
  6. Mercer T. Aerosol technology in hazard evaluation. New York and London; Academic Press. 1973.
  7. Hinds W. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc,. 1998.
  8. Birky B, Tolaymat T, Warren B, Ammons R, McNally T, Nall W. Evaluation of exposure to Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM) in the phosphate industry. Publication No. 05-046-155. FL: Florida Institute of Phosphate Research. 1998.
  9. Marple V. History of impactors-The first 110 years, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004;38:247-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490424347
  10. Pegnam R, Pilat M. Airborne particulate emissions form a chromic-acid anodizing process tank, J. Air. Waste Manage Assoc. 1992;42(3):303-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466994
  11. Pilat M, Steig T. Size distribution of particulateemissions from a pressurized fluidized-bed coal combustion cacility, Atmos. Environ. 1983;17(12): 2429-2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(83)90067-7
  12. Guimond R. The Radiological Aspects of Fertilizer Utilization. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency. Washington DC; NUREG/CP-0001. 1978:380-393.
  13. National Council on Radiation Protection. Radiation Exposure of the U.S. Population from Consumer Products and Miscellaneous Sources. NCRP Report No. 95. Bethesda, MD. 1987.
  14. Owen R, Hyder L. Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactivity: An Overview. ORNL/CF-80/265. Oak Ridge, TN. 1980.
  15. Roessler CE, Smith ZA, Bolch WE, Prince RJ. Uranium and radium-226 in Florida phosphate materials, Health Phys. 1979;37(3):269-277. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-197909000-00001
  16. Scholten LS. Natural radioactivity in phosphate fetilizers. Fertilizer Research 43. 1996;103-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00747688
  17. Kim KP, Wu CY, Birky BK, Nall W, Bolch WE. Characterization of radioactive aerosols in Florida phosphate processing facilities. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 2006;40(6): 410-421 https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600643313
  18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000. United Nations, Austria. 2000.
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency. Assessing the need for radiation protection measures in work involving minerals and raw materials. IAEA Technical Report Series No 49. Vienna, Austria. 2006.

Cited by

  1. Effective dose evaluation of NORM-added consumer products using Monte Carlo simulations and the ICRP computational human phantoms vol.110, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.01.002
  2. An effective dose assessment technique with NORM added consumer products using skin-point source on computational human phantom vol.118, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.08.014