DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Natural Organic Matter Removal and Fouling Control in Low-Pressure Membrane Filtration for Water Treatment

  • Cui, Xiaojun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Choo, Kwang-Ho (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2014.01.28
  • Accepted : 2014.02.08
  • Published : 2014.03.30

Abstract

Natural organic matter (NOM) is a primary component of fouling in low-pressure membrane filtration, either solely, or in concert with colloidal particles. Various preventive measures to interfere with NOM fouling have been developed and extensively tested, such as coagulation, oxidation, ion exchange, carbon adsorption, and mineral oxide adsorption. Therefore, this article aims to conduct a literature review covering the topics of low-pressure membrane processes, NOM characteristics and fouling behaviors, and diverse fouling control strategies. In-depth explanations and discussion are made regarding why some treatment options are able to remove NOM from source water, but do not reduce fouling. This review provides insight for hybridized membrane processes with respect to NOM removal and fouling mitigation in water treatment.

Keywords

Adsorption;Coagulation;Microfiltration;Natural organic matter;Oxidation;Ultrafiltration

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korean Environmental Industry & Technology Institute

References

  1. Choo KH, Tao R, Kim MJ. Use of a photocatalytic membrane reactor for the removal of natural organic matter in water: effect of photoinduced desorption and ferrihydrite adsorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;322:368-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.069
  2. Huang H, Schwab K, Jacangelo JG. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:3011-3019. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802473r
  3. Yuan W, Zydney AL. Effects of solution environment on humic acid fouling during microfiltration. Desalination 1999;122:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00028-4
  4. Choo KH, Kang SK. Removal of residual organic matter from secondary effluent by iron oxides adsorption. Desalination 2003;154:139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)80014-0
  5. Lee KW, Choo KH, Choi SJ, Yamamoto K. Development of an integrated iron oxide adsorption/membrane separation system for water treatment. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2002;2:293-300.
  6. Ha TW, Choo KH, Choi SJ. Effect of chlorine on adsorption/ ultrafiltration treatment for removing natural organic matter in drinking water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;274:587-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.03.010
  7. Yao P, Choo KH, Kim MH. A hybridized photocatalysismicrofiltration system with iron oxide-coated membranes for the removal of natural organic matter in water treatment: effects of iron oxide layers and colloids. Water Res. 2009;43:4238-4248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.010
  8. Chang YJ, Choo KH, Benjamin MM, Reiber S. Combined adsorption-UF process increases TOC removal. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1998;90:90-102.
  9. Zhang M, Li C, Benjamin MM, Chang Y. Fouling and natural organic matter removal in adsorbent/membrane systems for drinking water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;37:1663-1669. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0260418
  10. Kim J, Cai Z, Benjamin MM. Effects of adsorbents on membrane fouling by natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;310:356-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.007
  11. Cai Z, Kim J, Benjamin MM. NOM removal by adsorption and membrane filtration using heated aluminum oxide particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:619-623. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7021285
  12. Kitis M, Kaplan SS. Advanced oxidation of natural organic matter using hydrogen peroxide and iron-coated pumice particles. Chemosphere 2007;68:1846-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.027
  13. Kim J, Cai Z, Benjamin MM. NOM fouling mechanisms in a hybrid adsorption/membrane system. J. Membr. Sci. 2010;349:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.017
  14. Chi FH, Amy GL. Kinetic study on the sorption of dissolved natural organic matter onto different aquifer materials: the effects of hydrophobicity and functional groups. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;274:380-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.049
  15. Kitis M, Kaplan SS, Karakaya E, Yigit NO, Civelekoglu G. Adsorption of natural organic matter from waters by iron coated pumice. Chemosphere 2007;66:130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.002
  16. Ding C, Yang X, Liu W, Chang Y, Shang C. Removal of natural organic matter using surfactant-modified iron oxide-coated sand. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;174:567-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.089
  17. Foppen JW, Liem Y, Schijven J. Effect of humic acid on the attachment of Escherichia coli in columns of goethite-coated sand. Water Res. 2008;42:211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.064
  18. Benjamin MM, Sletten RS, Bailey RP, Bennett T. Sorption and filtration of metals using iron-oxide-coated sand. Water Res. 1996;30:2609-2620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00161-3
  19. Lai CH, Chen CY. Removal of metal ions and humic acid from water by iron-coated filter media. Chemosphere 2001;44:1177-1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00307-6
  20. Lee EK, Chen V, Fane AG. Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling in low pressure membrane filtration: effect of membranes and operation modes. Desalination 2008;218:257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.021
  21. Lee N, Amy G, Croue JP, Buisson H. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/ UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM). Water Res. 2004;38:4511-4523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.013
  22. Huang H, Lee N, Young T, Gary A, Lozier JC, Jacangelo JG. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions. Water Res. 2007;41:3823-3832 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.036
  23. Lee N, Amy G, Croue JP. Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. Water Res. 2006;40:2357-2368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.023
  24. Lee N, Amy G, Croue JP, Buisson H. Morphological analyses of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of low-pressure membranes (MF/UF). J. Membr. Sci. 2005;261:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.02.039
  25. Lee SJ, Choo KH, Lee CH. Conjunctive use of ultrafiltration with powdered activated carbon adsorption for removal of synthetic and natural organic matter. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2000; 6:357-364.
  26. Lee SA, Choo KH, Lee CH, et al. Use of ultrafiltration membranes for the separation of TiO2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001;40:1712-1719. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie000738p
  27. Qu F, Liang H, Zhou J, et al. Ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by extracellular organic matter (EOM) from Microcystis aeruginosa: effects of membrane pore size and surface hydrophobicity. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;449:58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.070
  28. Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios SG, Karabelas AJ. A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recovery by backwashing: experiments and modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;266:40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.009
  29. Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios SG, Karabelas AJ. An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery. Desalination 2008;220:214-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.038
  30. Wray HE, Andrews RC, Berube PR. Surface shear stress and retention of emerging contaminants during ultrafiltration for drinking water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014;122:183-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.11.003
  31. Fan L, Harris JL, Roddick FA, Booker NA. Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Res. 2001;35:4455-4463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00183-X
  32. Wray HE, Andrews RC, Berube PR. Surface shear stress and membrane fouling when considering natural water matrices. Desalination 2013;330:22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.018
  33. Akhondi E, Wicaksana F, Fane AG. Evaluation of fouling deposition, fouling reversibility and energy consumption of submerged hollow fiber membrane systems with periodic backwash. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;452:319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.031
  34. Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, Amy G, Ohkuma N. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res. 2004;38:3431-3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.007
  35. Zularisam AW, Ismail AF, Salim MR, Sakinah M, Ozaki H. The effects of natural organic matter (NOM) fractions on fouling characteristics and flux recovery of ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2007;212:191-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.010
  36. Senesi N. Nature of interactions between organic chemicals and dissolved humic substances and the influence of environmental factors. In: Beck AJ, Jones KC, Hayes MH, eds. Organic substances in soil and water: natural constituents and their influence on contaminant behavior. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 1993. p. 73-101.
  37. Huang G, Meng F, Zheng X, et al. Biodegradation behavior of natural organic matter (NOM) in a biological aerated filter (BAF) as a pretreatment for ultrafiltration (UF) of river water. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011;90:1795-1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3251-1
  38. Kim HC, Yu MJ. Characterization of natural organic matter in conventional water treatment processes for selection of treatment processes focused on DBPs control. Water Res. 2005;39:4779-4789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.021
  39. Jermann D, Pronk W, Boller M. Mutual influences between natural organic matter and inorganic particles and their combined effect on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:9129-9136. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800654p
  40. Taniguchi M, Kilduff JE, Belfort G. Modes of natural organic matter fouling during ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;37:1676-1683. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020555p
  41. Jermann D, Pronk W, Meylan S, Boller M. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. Water Res. 2007;41:1713-1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.030
  42. Jermann D, Pronk W, Kagi R, Halbeisen M, Boller M. Influence of interactions between NOM and particles on UF fouling mechanisms. Water Res. 2008;42:3870-3878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.013
  43. Howe KJ, Clark MM. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36:3571-3576. https://doi.org/10.1021/es025587r
  44. Yuan W, Zydney AL. Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000;34:5043-5050. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0012366
  45. Yu CH, Wu CH, Lin CH, Hsiao CH, Lin CF. Hydrophobicity and molecular weight of humic substances on ultrafiltration fouling and resistance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008;64:206-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.10.008
  46. Zularisam AW, Ahmad A, Sakinah M, Ismail AF, Matsuura T. Role of natural organic matter (NOM), colloidal particles, and solution chemistry on ultrafiltration performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011;78:189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.001
  47. Yuan W, Zydney AL. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999;157:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00329-9
  48. Yuan W, Kocic A, Zydney AL. Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using a pore blockage-cake filtration model. J. Membr. Sci. 2002;198:51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00622-6
  49. Yamamura H, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. Mechanism involved in the evolution of physically irreversible fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes used for drinking water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:6789-6794. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0629054
  50. Costa AR, de Pinho MN, Elimelech M. Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;281:716-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.044
  51. Kim J, Shi W, Yuan Y, Benjamin MM. A serial filtration investigation of membrane fouling by natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;294:115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.020
  52. Yamamura H, Chae S, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. Transition in fouling mechanism in microfiltration of a surface water. Water Res. 2007;41:3812-3822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.060
  53. Haberkamp J, Ruhl AS, Ernst M, Jekel M. Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behaviour in ultrafiltration. Water Res. 2007;41:3794-3802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.029
  54. Guigui C, Rouch JC, Durand-Bourlier L, Bonnelye V, Aptel P. Impact of coagulation conditions on the in-line coagulation/ UF process for drinking water production. Desalination 2002;147:95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00582-9
  55. Park P, Lee C, Choi SJ, Choo KH, Kim SH, Yoon CH. Effect of the removal of DOMs on the performance of a coagulation- UF membrane system for drinking water production. Desalination 2002;145:237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00418-6
  56. Tran T, Gray S, Naughton R, Bolto B. Polysilicato-iron for improved NOM removal and membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;280:560-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.013
  57. Wang J, Wang XC. Ultrafiltration with in-line coagulation for the removal of natural humic acid and membrane fouling mechanism. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2006;18:880-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60008-9
  58. Carroll T, King S, Gray SR, Bolto BA, Booker NA. The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment. Water Res. 2000;34:2861-2868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00051-8
  59. Barbot E, Moustier S, Bottero JY, Moulin P. Coagulation and ultrafiltration: understanding of the key parameters of the hybrid process. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;325:520-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.054
  60. Lee BB, Choo KH, Chang D, Choi SJ. Optimizing the coagulant dose to control membrane fouling in combined coagulation/ ultrafiltration systems for textile wastewater reclamation. Chem. Eng. J. 2009;155:101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.014
  61. Maartens A, Swart P, Jacobs EP. Feed-water pretreatment: methods to reduce membrane fouling by natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 1999;163:51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00155-6
  62. Kabsch-Korbutowicz M. Application of ultrafiltration integrated with coagulation for improved NOM removal. Desalination 2005;174:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.08.037
  63. Kimura K, Maeda T, Yamamura H, Watanabe Y. Irreversible membrane fouling in microfiltration membranes filtering coagulated surface water. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;320:356-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.018
  64. Song Y, Dong B, Gao N, Xia S. Huangpu River water treatment by microfiltration with ozone pretreatment. Desalination 2010;250:71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.06.047
  65. Wang X, Wang L, Liu Y, Duan W. Ozonation pretreatment for ultrafiltration of the secondary effluent. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;287:187-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.016
  66. Karnik BS, Davies SH, Chen KC, Jaglowski DR, Baumann MJ, Masten SJ. Effects of ozonation on the permeate flux of nanocrystalline ceramic membranes. Water Res. 2005;39:728-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.017
  67. Oh BS, Jang HY, Hwang TM, Kang JW. Role of ozone for reducing fouling due to pharmaceuticals in MF (microfiltration) process. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;289:178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.052
  68. Bolto B, Dixon D, Eldridge R, King S. Removal of THM precursors by coagulation or ion exchange. Water Res. 2002;36:5066-5073. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00232-4
  69. Chae SR, Yamamura H, Ikeda K, Watanabe Y. Comparison of fouling characteristics of two different poly-vinylidene fluoride microfiltration membranes in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment system using pre-coagulation/sedimentation, sand filtration, and chlorination. Water Res. 2008;42:2029-2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.011
  70. Choo KH, Lee H, Choi SJ. Iron and manganese removal and membrane fouling during UF in conjunction with prechlorination for drinking water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;267:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.021
  71. Kim MJ, Choo KH, Park HS. Photocatalytic degradation of seawater organic matter using a submerged membrane reactor. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010;216:215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.08.011
  72. Bolto B, Dixon D, Eldridge R, King S, Linge K. Removal of natural organic matter by ion exchange. Water Res. 2002;36:5057-5065. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00231-2
  73. Bolto B, Dixon D, Eldridge R. Ion exchange for the removal of natural organic matter. React. Funct. Polym. 2004;60:171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.02.021
  74. Fearing DA, Banks J, Guyetand S, et al. Combination of ferric and MIEX for the treatment of a humic rich water. Water Res. 2004;38:2551-2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.020
  75. Cornelissen ER, Moreau N, Siegers WG, et al. Selection of anionic exchange resins for removal of natural organic matter (NOM) fractions. Water Res. 2008;42:413-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.033
  76. Cornelissen ER, Beerendonk EF, Nederlof MN, van der Hoek JP, Wessels LP. Fluidized ion exchange (FIX) to control NOM fouling in ultrafiltration. Desalination 2009;236:334-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.084
  77. Han J, Kong C, Heo J, Yoon Y, Lee H, Her N. Removal of perchlorate using reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Environ. Eng. Res. 2012;17:185-190. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2012.17.4.185
  78. Humbert H, Gallard H, Jacquemet V, Croue JP. Combination of coagulation and ion exchange for the reduction of UF fouling properties of a high DOC content surface water. Water Res. 2007;41:3803-3811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.009
  79. Kabsch-Korbutowicz M, Majewska-Nowak K, Winnicki T. Water treatment using MIEX(R)DOC/ultrafiltration process. Desalination 2008;221:338-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.092
  80. Huang H, Cho HH, Schwab KJ, Jacangelo JG. Effects of magnetic ion exchange pretreatment on low pressure membrane filtration of natural surface water. Water Res. 2012;46:5483-5490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.003
  81. Humbert H, Gallard H, Suty H, Croue JP. Performance of selected anion exchange resins for the treatment of a high DOC content surface water. Water Res. 2005;39:1699-1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.008
  82. Fabris R, Lee EK, Chow CWK, Chen V, Drikas M. Pre-treatments to reduce fouling of low pressure micro-filtration (MF) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;289:231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.003
  83. Tsujimoto W, Kimura H, Izu T, Irie T. Membrane filtration and pre-treatment by GAC. Desalination 1998;119:323-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00176-3
  84. Kim KY, Kim HS, Kim J, Nam JW, Kim JM, Son S. A hybrid microfiltration-granular activated carbon system for water purification and wastewater reclamation/reuse. Desalination 2009;243:132-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.020
  85. Lin CF, Huang YJ, Hao OJ. Ultrafiltration processes for removing humic substances: effect of molecular weight fractions and PAC treatment. Water Res. 1999;33:1252-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00322-4
  86. Li K, Qu F, Liang H, et al. Performance of mesoporous adsorbent resin and powdered activated carbon in mitigating ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by algal extracellular organic matter. Desalination 2014;336:129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.001
  87. Uyak V, Akdagli M, Cakmakci M, Koyuncu I. Natural organic matter removal and fouling in a low pressure hybrid membrane systems. Sci. World J. 2014;2014:11.
  88. Gu B, Schmitt J, Chen Z, Liang L, McCarthy JF. Adsorption and desorption of natural organic matter on iron oxide: mechanisms and models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994;28:38-46. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00050a007
  89. Kang SK, Choo KH. Why does a mineral oxide adsorbent control fouling better than powdered activated carbon in hybrid ultrafiltration water treatment? J. Membr. Sci. 2010;355:69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.007
  90. Campinas M, Rosa MJ. Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems. Water Res. 2010;44:1636-1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.012
  91. Ding C, Shang C. Mechanisms controlling adsorption of natural organic matter on surfactant-modified iron oxidecoated sand. Water Res. 2010;44:3651-3658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.014
  92. Cui X, Choo KH. Granular iron oxide adsorbents to control natural organic matter and membrane fouling in ultrafiltration water treatment. Water Res. 2013;47:4227-4237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.060
  93. Kim J, Deng Q, Benjamin MM. Simultaneous removal of phosphorus and foulants in a hybrid coagulation/membrane filtration system. Water Res. 2008;42:2017-2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.017
  94. Shi W, Benjamin MM. Membrane interactions with NOM and an adsorbent in a vibratory shear enhanced filtration process (VSEP) system. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;312:23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.12.031
  95. Sperlich A, Werner A, Genz A, Amy G, Worch E, Jekel M. Breakthrough behavior of granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) fixed-bed adsorption filters: modeling and experimental approaches. Water Res. 2005;39:1190-1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.032
  96. Sperlich A, Schimmelpfennig S, Baumgarten B, et al. Predicting anion breakthrough in granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorption filters. Water Res. 2008;42:2073-2082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.019
  97. Genz A, Baumgarten B, Goernitz M, Jekel M. NOM removal by adsorption onto granular ferric hydroxide: equilibrium, kinetics, filter and regeneration studies. Water Res. 2008;42:238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.005
  98. Edwards M, Benjamin MM, Ryan JN. Role of organic acidity in sorption of natural organic matter (NOM) to oxide surfaces. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1996;107:297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-7757(95)03371-8
  99. Gu B, Schmitt J, Chen Z, Liang L, McCarthy JF. Adsorption and desorption of different organic matter fractions on iron oxide. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995;59:219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)00282-Q
  100. Gu B, Mehlhorn TL, Liang L, McCarthy JF. Competitive adsorption, displacement, and transport of organic matter on iron oxide: I. Competitive adsorption. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996;60:1943-1950. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00059-2
  101. Gu B, Mehlhorn TL, Liang L, McCarthy JF. Competitive adsorption, displacement, and transport of organic matter on iron oxide: II. Displacement and transport. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996;60:2977-2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00157-3
  102. Korshin GV, Benjamin MM, Sletten RS. Adsorption of natural organic matter (NOM) on iron oxide: effects on NOM composition and formation of organo-halide compounds during chlorination. Water Res. 1997;31:1643-1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00007-9

Cited by

  1. Microalgae membrane photobioreactor for further removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from secondary sewage effluent vol.32, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0043-9
  2. Experimental investigation and modeling of industrial oily wastewater treatment using modified polyethersulfone ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes vol.32, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0310-1
  3. Membrane fouling control in low pressure membranes: A review on pretreatment techniques for fouling abatement vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.017
  4. Characterization and Seawater Filtration Performance of Commerical Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes vol.39, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2017.39.9.542