Comparative Analysis of the Biological Characteristics of Ephedrus plagiator (Nees) and Aphidius ervi Haliday according to Different Aphid Hosts

기주에 따른 목화검정진디벌(Ephedrus plagiator (Nees))과 진디벌(Aphidius ervi Haliday)의 생물학적 특성 비교

  • Ji, Chang Woo (Crop Protection Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Kang, Eun Jin (Crop Protection Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Byeon, Young-Woong (Director General for Planning and Coordination, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Hwan (Crop Protection Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Choi, Byeong Ryeol (Crop Protection Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA))
  • 지창우 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 작물보호과) ;
  • 강은진 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 작물보호과) ;
  • 변영웅 (농촌진흥청 기획조정관실) ;
  • 김정환 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 작물보호과) ;
  • 최병렬 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 작물보호과)
  • Received : 2014.10.13
  • Accepted : 2014.11.07
  • Published : 2014.12.01


To investigate the biological control of Aulacorthum solani, a comparative analysis was carried out using an indigenous natural enemy, Ephedrus plagiator, and an exotic parasitoid, Aphidius ervi. Lifespan, spawning periods, number of mummies, number of offspring, and developmental periods of the two parasitoids on Aulacorthum solani and Acyrthosiphon pisum were studied at 15, 20, 25, and $30^{\circ}C$ with a photoperiod 16 h (L): 8 h (D). The lifespan of E. plagiator (5.3 days) was relatively higher than that of A. ervi (2.3 days) when these parasitoids were reared on A. solani at $15^{\circ}C$. Similarly, the spawning period of E. plagiator (5.3 days) was longer than that of A. ervi (2.2 days). When the two aphid parasitoids were provisioned with A. solani, the numbers of E. plagiator mummies at 15, 20, 25, and $30^{\circ}C$ were 71.5, 41, 15.7, and 7.7, respectively, whereas at the same temperatures, the numbers of A. ervi mummies were 22.1 16.3, 6.2, and 0.4, respectively. In contrast, when provision with A. pisum, the numbers of E. plagiator mummies at 15, 20, 25, and $30^{\circ}C$ were 70.3, 69.8, 34.3, and 8.4, whereas the numbers of A. ervi mummies were 93.4, 71.2, 34.8, and 14.5, respectively. The numbers of E. plagiator offspring emerging at 15, 20, 25, and $30^{\circ}C$ were 42.1, 36, 11.6, and 0, whereas the numbers of A. ervi offspring emerging were relatively lower at 19.6, 13.5, 3.7, and 0.1, respectively. By comparing these results, it can be concluded that E. plagiator is a more efficient parasitoid of A. solani, whereas A. ervi is more efficient on A. pisum.


Supported by : 국립농업과학원


  1. Blackman, R.L., Eastop, V.F., 1984. Aphids on the world of crops: an identification and information guide. Wiley, New York.
  2. Carson, R., 2002. Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  3. Chang, Y.D., Lee, J.Y., Youn, Y.N., 1994. Primary parasitoids and hyperparasitoids of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines (Homoptera: Aphlididae). Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 33, 51-55.
  4. Daza-Bustamante, P., Fuentes-Contreras, E., Rodriguez, L.C., Figueroa, C.C., Niemeyer, H.M., 2002. Behavioural differences between Aphidius ervi populations from two tritrophic systems are due to phenotypic plasticity. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104, 321-328.
  5. Dean, G.J., 1974. Effects of parasites and predators on the cereal aphids Metopolophium dirhodum (Wlk.) and Macrosiphum avenae (F.) (Hem., Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomol. Res. 63, 411-422.
  6. Fuentes-Contreras, E., J.E., Powell, W., Wadhams, L.J., Pickett, J.A., Niemeyer, H.M., 1996. Influence of wheat and oat cultivars on the development of the cereal aphid parasitoid Aphidius rhopalosiphi and the generalist aphid parasitoid Ephedrus plagiator. Annals of Appl. Biol. 129, 181-187.
  7. Jackson, H.B., Rogers, C.E., Eikenbary, R.D., Starks, K.J., McNew, R.W., 1974. Biology of Ephedrus plagiator on different aphid hosts and at various temperatures. Environ. Entomol. 3, 618-620.
  8. Jandricic, S.E., Wraight, S.P., Bennett, K.C., Sanderson, J.P., 2010. Developmental times and life table statistics of Aulacorthum solani (Hemiptera: Aphididae) at six constant temperatures, with recommendations on the application of temperature-dependent development models. Environ. Entomol. 39, 1631-1642.
  9. Jeon, H.Y., Kim, H.H., 2006. Damage and seasonal occurrence of major insect pests by cropping period in environmentally friendly lettuce greenhouse. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 45, 275-282.
  10. Kang, E.J., Byeon, Y.-W., Kim, J.-H., Choi, M.-Y., Choi, Y.-S., 2012. The effect of temperatures on the biological characteristics of two aphid parasitoids Aphelinus asychis (Walker) and Aphelinus varipes (Forster) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) on two aphid hosts. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 51, 397-403.
  11. Kim, D.H., Lee, H.H., Park, J.H., Hwang, C.Y., 1991. Occurrence aspects and ecological characteristics of foxglove aphid, Aulacorthum solani, Kaltenbach (Homoptera: Aphididae) in soybean. Res. Rept. RDA (C.P) 33, 28-32.
  12. Kim, Y.H., Kim, J.-H., Byeon, Y.-W., Choi, B.R., 2005. Guide for use of natural enemies. National Academy of Agricultural Science.
  13. Miller, G.L., Stoetzel, M.B., 1997. Aphids associated with chrysanthemums in the United States. Fla. Entomol. 80, 218-239.
  14. Park, B.-J., Lee, J.-H., 2011. Pesticide residue monitoring and environmental exposure in paddy field soils and greenhouse soils. The Korean J. of Pesticides Sci. 15, 134-139.
  15. Powell, W., Wright, A.F., 1991. The influence of host food plants on host recognition by four aphidiine parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomol. Res. 81, 449-453.
  16. Rogers, C.E., Jackson, H.B., Eikenbary, R.D., Starks, K.J., 1972. Host-Parasitoid interaction of Aphis helianthi on sunflowers with introduced Aphelinus asychis, Ephedrus plagiator and Praon gallicum and native Aphelinus nigritus and Lysiphlebus testaceipes. Ann. of the Entomol. Soci. of America. 65, 38-41.
  17. Sanchez, J.A., Canovas, F., Lacasa, A., 2007. Thresholds and management strategies for Aulacorthum solani (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in greenhouse pepper. J. Econ. Entomol. 100, 123-130.
  18. Waage, J.K., Hassell, M.P. 1982. Parasitoids as biological control agents-a fundamental approach. Parasitol. 84, 241-268.
  19. Zar, J.H., 1984. Bioststistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.