DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of Lung Cancer Based on Serum Biomarkers by Gene Expression Programming Methods

  • Yu, Zhuang (Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University) ;
  • Chen, Xiao-Zheng (Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University) ;
  • Cui, Lian-Hua (Department of Public Health, Qingdao University Medical College) ;
  • Si, Hong-Zong (Department of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, Institute for Computational Science and Engineering, Laboratory of New Fibrous Materials and Modern Textile, the Growing Base for State Key Laboratory) ;
  • Lu, Hai-Jiao (Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University) ;
  • Liu, Shi-Hai (The central Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University)
  • Published : 2014.11.28

Abstract

In diagnosis of lung cancer, rapid distinction between small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors is very important. Serum markers, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), neurone specific enolase (NSE) and Cyfra21-1, are reported to reflect lung cancer characteristics. In this study classification of lung tumors was made based on biomarkers (measured in 120 NSCLC and 60 SCLC patients) by setting up optimal biomarker joint models with a powerful computerized tool - gene expression programming (GEP). GEP is a learning algorithm that combines the advantages of genetic programming (GP) and genetic algorithms (GA). It specifically focuses on relationships between variables in sets of data and then builds models to explain these relationships, and has been successfully used in formula finding and function mining. As a basis for defining a GEP environment for SCLC and NSCLC prediction, three explicit predictive models were constructed. CEA and NSE are requentlyused lung cancer markers in clinical trials, CRP, LDH and Cyfra21-1 have significant meaning in lung cancer, basis on CEA and NSE we set up three GEP models-GEP 1(CEA, NSE, Cyfra21-1), GEP2 (CEA, NSE, LDH), GEP3 (CEA, NSE, CRP). The best classification result of GEP gained when CEA, NSE and Cyfra21-1 were combined: 128 of 135 subjects in the training set and 40 of 45 subjects in the test set were classified correctly, the accuracy rate is 94.8% in training set; on collection of samples for testing, the accuracy rate is 88.9%. With GEP2, the accuracy was significantly decreased by 1.5% and 6.6% in training set and test set, in GEP3 was 0.82% and 4.45% respectively. Serum Cyfra21-1 is a useful and sensitive serum biomarker in discriminating between NSCLC and SCLC. GEP modeling is a promising and excellent tool in diagnosis of lung cancer.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Science & Technology of Shandong province

References

  1. Amsellem-Ouazana D, Younes P, Conquy S, et al (2005). Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study. Eur Urol, 47, 582-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.015
  2. Barash O, Peled N, Tisch U, et al (2012). Classification of lung cancer histology by gold nanoparticle sensors. Nanomedicine, 8, 580-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.10.001
  3. Biglarian A, Bakhshi E, Gohari MR, et al (2012). Artificial neural network for prediction of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 927-30. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.3.927
  4. Cho WC (2007). Potentially useful biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer. Biomed Pharmacother, 61, 515-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2007.08.005
  5. Chu XY, Hou XB, Song WA, et al (2011). Diagnostic values of SCC, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE for lung cancer in patients with suspicious pulmonary masses: a single center analysis. Cancer Biol Ther, 11, 995-1000. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.11.12.15526
  6. Farlow EC, Vercillo MS, Coon JS, et al (2010). A multi-analyte serum test for the detection of non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer, 103, 1221-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605865
  7. Feng F, Wu Y, Wu Y, et al (2012). The effect of artificial neural network model combined with six tumor markers in auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer. J Med Syst, 36, 2973-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9775-1
  8. Gaarenstroom KN, Bonfrer JM, Kenter GG, et al (1995). Clinical value of pretreatment serum Cyfra 21-1, tissue polypeptide antigen, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in patients with cervical cancer. Cancer, 76, 807-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950901)76:5<807::AID-CNCR2820760515>3.0.CO;2-M
  9. Gopinath B, Shanthi N (2013). Support Vector Machine based diagnostic system for thyroid cancer using statistical texture features. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 97-102. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.1.97
  10. Gwak HK, Lee JH, Park SG (2014). Preliminary evaluation of clinical utility of CYFRA 21-1, CA 72-4, NSE, CA19-9 and CEA in stomach cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 4933-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.12.4933
  11. Kim YW, Bae SM, Lim H, et al (2012). Development of multiplexed bead-based immunoassays for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer using a combination of serum biomarkers. PLoS One, 7, 44960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044960
  12. Kligerman S, Abbott G (2010). A radiologic review of the new TNM classification for lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 194, 562-73. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3354
  13. Kusy M, Obrzut B, Kluska J (2013). Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. Med Biol Eng Comput, 51, 1357-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8
  14. Lee JG, Cho BC, Bae MK, et al (2009). Preoperative C-reactive protein levels are associated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 63, 106-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.04.011
  15. Lee JH (2013). Clinical Usefulness of Serum CYFRA 21-1 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 47, 181-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-013-0218-4
  16. Leidinger P, Keller A, Heisel S, et al (2010). Identification of lung cancer with high sensitivity and specificity by blood testing. Respir Res, 11, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-18
  17. Li J, Chen P, Mao CM, et al (2014). Evaluation of diagnostic value of four tumor markers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of peripheral lung cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 10, 141-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12066
  18. Li J, Orlandi R, White CN, et al (2005). Independent validation of candidate breast cancer serum biomarkers identified by mass spectrometry. Clin Chem, 51, 2229-35. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.052878
  19. Molina R, Filella X, Auge JM, et al (2003). Tumor markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, SCC and NSE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer as an aid in histological diagnosis and prognosis. Comparison with the main clinical and pathological prognostic factors. Tumour Biol, 24, 209-18. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074432
  20. Nakata B, Takashima T, Ogawa Y, et al (2004). Serum CYFRA 21-1 (cytokeratin-19 fragments) is a useful tumour marker for detecting disease relapse and assessing treatment efficacy in breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 91, 873-8.
  21. Nevins JR (2011). Pathway-based classification of lung cancer: a strategy to guide therapeutic selection. Proc Am Thorac Soc, 8, 180-2. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.201006-040MS
  22. Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Stankowski RV, et al (2012). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a biomarker for trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 134, 291-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2039-z
  23. Ono A, Takahashi T, Mori K, et al (2013). Prognostic impact of serum CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer, 13, 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-354
  24. Patz EF, Jr., Campa MJ, Gottlin EB, et al (2007). Panel of serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 25, 5578-83. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5392
  25. Perkins GL, Slater ED, Sanders GK, et al (2003). Serum tumor markers. Am Fam Physician, 68, 1075-82.
  26. Raj V, Bajaj A, Entwisle JJ (2011). Implications of new (seventh) TNM classification of lung cancer on general radiologists-a pictorial review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 40, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2010.02.002
  27. Schneider J, Bitterlich N, Velcovsky HG, et al (2002). Fuzzy logic-based tumor-marker profiles improved sensitivity in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol, 7, 145-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101470200021
  28. Taguchi F, Solomon B, Gregorc V, et al (2007). Mass spectrometry to classify non-small-cell lung cancer patients for clinical outcome after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a multicohort cross-institutional study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 99, 838-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk195
  29. Tomita M, Shimizu T, Ayabe T, et al (2010). Prognostic significance of tumour marker index based on preoperative CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res, 30, 3099-102.
  30. Travis WD (2011). Classification of lung cancer. Semin Roentgenol, 46, 178-86. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2011.02.003
  31. Travis WD, Travis LB, Devesa SS (1995). Lung cancer. Cancer, 75, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1+<191::AID-CNCR2820751307>3.0.CO;2-Y
  32. Tureci O, Mack U, Luxemburger U, et al (2006). Humoral immune responses of lung cancer patients against tumor antigen NY-ESO-1. Cancer Lett, 236, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2005.05.008
  33. Wang WJ, Tao Z, Gu W, et al (2013). Clinical observations on the association between diagnosis of lung cancer and serum tumor markers in combination. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 4369-71. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4369
  34. Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2000). Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? JAMA, 283, 2975-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.22.2975
  35. Wieskopf B, Demangeat C, Purohit A, et al (1995). Cyfra 21-1 as a biologic marker of non-small cell lung cancer. Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic role. Chest, 108, 163-9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.108.1.163
  36. Wrona A, Jassem J (2010). [The new TNM classification in lung cancer]. Pneumonol Alergol Pol, 78, 407-17.
  37. Yang ZM, Ding XP, Pen L, et al (2014). Analysis of CEA expression and EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancers. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 3451-5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.8.3451
  38. Zhang D, Ren WH, Gao Y, et al (2013). Clinical significance and prognostic value of pentraxin-3 as serologic biomarker for lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 4215-21. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4215
  39. Zhao D, Xiong Y, Lei QY, et al (2013). LDH-A acetylation: implication in cancer. Oncotarget, 4, 802-3.
  40. Zhong J, Wang J, Peng W, et al (2013). Prediction of essential proteins based on gene expression programming. BMC Genomics, 14, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-7
  41. Ziaian B, Saberi A, Ghayyoumi MA, et al (2014). Association of high LDH and low glucose levels in pleural space with HER2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 1617-20. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.4.1617

Cited by

  1. Combination of Circulating Tumor Cells with Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Enhances Clinical Prediction of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer vol.10, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126276
  2. Pemetrexed Induces G1 Phase Arrest and Apoptosis through Inhibiting Akt Activation in Human Non Small Lung Cancer Cell Line A549 vol.16, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.4.1507
  3. Recurrent Syncope Associated with Lung Cancer vol.2015, pp.1687-9635, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/309784
  4. Lung cancer prediction from microarray data by gene expression programming vol.10, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-syb.2015.0082
  5. Tumour-associated antigens and their anti-cancer applications vol.26, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12446
  6. Current and Prospective Protein Biomarkers of Lung Cancer vol.9, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9110155
  7. A novel gene selection algorithm for cancer classification using microarray datasets vol.12, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-018-0447-6