Cost-Benefit Analysis for Planting Type of Street Trees

가로수 조성 유형에 따른 비용편익 비교 분석

  • Kim, Joon Soon (Department of forest management Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong Kun (Department of Landscape Architecture, Seoul National.)
  • 김준순 (강원대학교 산림경영학과) ;
  • 이동근 (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2014.10.17
  • Accepted : 2014.12.09
  • Published : 2014.12.31


The objective of this study is to estimate the cost and benefits of street trees for their planting types, specifically, single row, single row+bottom, double row, double row+bottom. Different planting types are compared and analyzed by using Net Present Value (NPV) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR). Existing data are collected from the literature reviews for the use of meta-analysis method for estimating cost and benefit. The elements for analyzing costs are management and planting costs, and benefits are air purification, energy saving and landscape view. The discount rate is applied at a minimum of 3% and a maximum of 5.5%. The unit used in this calculation is km/year. The result shows that the net benefit is highest in double row, followed by single row, double row+bottom, and single row+bottom. The BCR is the highest in double row, followed by single row, double row+bottom, and single row+bottom. The BCR reaches the break-even point from 9 to 17 years depending on the planting types.


Supported by : 환경부


  1. Han JS. 2008. A Study on Planting Management Method for Enlargement and Quantity of $CO_2$ Uptake by Tree in the Landfill Site of Metropolitan Area, Korea. Thesis for the Degree of Master, Graduate School, University of Seoul. (in Korean)
  2. Hwang SI and Park SH. 2011. A Comparative Study on Estimation Methodologies of Carbon Sequestration Amount by Vegetation for Environmental Impact Assessment on Development Projects. Environmental Impact Assessment, 20(4): 477-487. (in Korean)
  3. Jo CK.Yoon YH and Lee KE. 1995. $CO_2$ Sequestration in Atmosphere by Urban Greenspace: For Chuncheon City. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 23(3) 80-93. (in Korean)
  4. Jo HK and Ahn TW. 1999. Function of Microclimate Amelioration by Urban Green- space. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 27(4): 23-28. (in Korean)
  5. Kwon YH.Kim JY and Lee MJ. 2008. Environmental Consideration in the Siting of Solar and Wind Power Plants. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  6. Kim SB. 2002. Human and Urban Environment. Daeyoung Moonhwasa, p.184. (in Korean)
  7. Kim JH.Kim GD.Kim RH.Park CY.Yoon HJ.Lee SW.Choi HT and Kim JJ. 2010. Korea Forest Research Institute, A Report of Research 10-26. (in Korean)
  8. Kim JS.Han WJ.Park HS and Lee SH. 2002. A Comparative Study on the Environmental Aspects of the Surface Transportation. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  9. Kim SK. 2013. The Effect of Social Discount Rate Manipulation on the Economic Feasibility Tests: Focusing on the Environmental Public Investment Projects. Journal of Environmental Policy, 12(4): 71-92. (in Korean)
  10. Korea Forest Service. 2014. Statistical Yearbook Of Forestry. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  11. Lee GG. 2003. Sustainability indicators of Greenspace in Apartment Sites. Ph.D. thesis, Seoul National University. (in Korean)
  12. Lee KH.Son YM.Seo JH.Kim RH.Park IH. Son YW and Lee YJ. 2006. Development of Greenhouse Gas Statistic System in Forest Sector to Climate Change. Korea Forest Research Institute. Research Report 06-20. (in Korean)
  13. Lee JY. 2014. A Study on Estimating Economic Value of Street Trees. Master thesis, Seoul National University. (in Korean)
  14. Park EJ. 2009. Quantification of $CO_2$ Uptake by Urban Trees and Greenspace Management for C Sequestration. Gyeonggi Research Institute. (in Korean)
  15. Sung JH. 2007. The Environmental Improvement Effects of Urban Forest and Roadside Trees. Forest Information 98-99. (in Korean)
  16. Sung HC.Min SH and Moon DM. 2002. A Study on the Planting & Management of Roadside Tree in Kyonggi-Do. Gyeonggi Research Institute, A Report of Research 2002-04. (in Korean)