DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the Nutritive Value of Whole Corn Stover and Its Morphological Fractions

  • Li, H.Y. ;
  • Xu, L. ;
  • Liu, W.J. ;
  • Fang, M.Q. ;
  • Wang, N.
  • Received : 2013.07.24
  • Accepted : 2013.10.09
  • Published : 2014.02.01

Abstract

This study investigated the chemical composition and ruminal degradability of corn stover in three maize-planting regions in Qiqihaer, Heilongjiang Province, China. The whole stover was separated into seven morphological fractions, i.e., leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem rind, stem pith, stem node, ear husk, and corn tassel. The assessment of nutritive value of corn stover and its fractions was performed based on laboratory assays of the morphological proportions, chemical composition, and in situ degradability of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). The chemical composition of corn stover was significantly different from plant top to bottom (p<0.05). Among the whole corn stover and seven morphological fractions, leaf blade had the highest crude protein (CP) content and the lowest NDF and ADF contents (p<0.05), whereas stem rind had the lowest CP content and the highest ADF and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents (p<0.05). Ear husk had significantly higher NDF content and relatively lower ADL content than other corn stover fractions. Overall, the effective degradability of DM, NDF, and ADF in rumen was the highest in leaf blade and stem pith, followed by ear husk. The results indicate that leaf blade, ear husk, and stem pith potentially have higher nutritive values than the other fractions of corn stover. This study provides reference data for high-efficiency use of corn stover in feeding ruminants.

Keywords

Whole Corn Stover;Morphological Fraction;Chemical Composition;In situ Degradability;Qiqihaer

References

  1. Ahmed, A. and J. Y. Zhu. 2006. Cornstalk as a source of fiber and energy. In: New technologies in non-wood fiber pulping and papermaking (Ed. H. Y. Zhan, F. G. Chen, and S. Y. Fu). South China University of Technology Press, Guangzhou, pp. 1-4.
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official method of analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., 66-88.
  3. Crandell, E. B. and J. W. Worley. 1988. Optimization of a device for separating sweet sorghum pith. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (88-6550):12.
  4. Crawford, T. W., V. V. Rending, and F. E. Bordabent. 1982. Source fluxes and sinks of nitrogen during early reproductive growth of maize. Plant Physiol. 70:1654-1660. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.70.6.1654
  5. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook 379. Agricultural Research Services, USDA, Washington, DC.
  6. Grundas, S. and G. Skubisz. 2008. Physical properties of cereal grainand rape stem. Res. Agr. Eng. 54:80-90.
  7. Han, Y. W. 2007. Assessment on feed criteria of dairy cattle in China. Chin. J. Feed Rev. 9:28-29.
  8. Hay, R. E., E. B. Earley, and E. E. Deutkr. 1953. Concentration and translocation of nitrogen compounds in the corn plant (Zea mays) during grain development. Plant Physiol. 28:606-621. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.28.4.606
  9. Hess, J. A., A. E. Olson, and R. S. Jacobs. 2002. Wisconsin corn stover - Part 1: Chemical composition. Proceedings of TAPPI 2002 Fall Technical Conference. TAPPI Press.
  10. Hunt, C. W., W. Kezar, and R. Vinande. 1992. Yield, chemical composition, and ruminal fermentability of corn whole plant, ear, and stover as affected by hybrid. Prod. Agric. 5:286-290. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1992.0286
  11. Lee, S., T. F. Shupe, and C. Y. Hse. 2006. Mechanical and physical properties of agro-based fiberboard. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff. 64:74-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-005-0062-z
  12. Liu, L. and D. Wang. 2011. Experimental study on separating mechanism of corn straw. J. Northeast Agricultural University. 42:43-47. (in Chinese)
  13. Jung, H. G. and M. S. Allen. 1995. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2774-2790.
  14. Karsli, M. A., and J. R. Russell. 2002. Prediction of the voluntary intake and digestibility of forage-based diets from chemical composition and ruminal degradation characteristics. Turk. Vet. Anim. Sci. 26:249-255.
  15. Kalmbacher, R. S. 1983. Distribution of dry matter and chemical constituents in plant parts of four florida native grasses. J. Range Manag. 36:298-301. https://doi.org/10.2307/3898473
  16. Madibela, O. R., W. S. Boitumelo, C. Manthe, and I. Raditedu. 2002. Chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility of local landraces of sweet sorghum in Botswana. Livest. Res. Rural Develop. 14(2). www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/ lrrd14/4/madi144.htm.
  17. Maheri-Sis, N., B. Abdollahi-Ziveh, R. Salamatdoustnobar, A. Ahmadzadeh, A. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani, and M. Mohebbizadeh. 2011. Determining nutritive value of soybean straw for ruminants using nylon bags technique. Pakistan J. Nutr. 10:838-841.
  18. Orskov, E. R. and I. McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  19. Sannasgala, K. and M. C. N. Jayasuriya. 1987. The influence of plant fractions on the digestibility of rice straw. Biol. Waste. 20:153-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(87)90165-0
  20. Schulthess, U., A. Tedla, M. A. Mohammed-Saleem, and A. N. Said. 1995. Effects of variety, altitude, and undersowing with legumes on the nutritive value of wheat straw. Exp. Agric. 31: 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700025254
  21. Shand, W. J., E. R. Ørskov, and L. A. F. Morrice. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straws. Anim. Prod. 47: 387-392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100003524
  22. Tan, Z. L., H. P. Chen, L. H. He, R. J. Fang, and T. X. Xing. 1995. Variation in the nutritional characteristics of wheat straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 53:337-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00721-K
  23. Tang, S. X., Z. L. Tang, C. S. Zhou, H. L. Jiang, Y. M. Jiang, and L. X. Sheng. 2006. A comparison of in vitro fermentation characteristics of different botanical fractions of mature maize stover. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 15:505-515.
  24. Tolera, A. and F. Sundstol. 1999. Morphological fractions of maize stover harvested at different stages of grain maturity and nutritive value of different fractions of the stover. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 81:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00072-3
  25. Tovar-Gomez, M. R., J. C. Emile, B. Michalet-Doreau, and Y. Barriere. 1997. In situ degradation kinetics of maize hybrid stalks. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 68:77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00036-9
  26. Vadiveloo, J. 2000. Nutritional properties of the leaf and stem of rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 83:57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00107-8
  27. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  28. Wang, H. F., Y. M. Wu, J. X. Liu, and Q. Qian. 2006. Morphological fractions, chemical compositions and in vitro gas production of rice straw from wild and brittle culm1variety harvested at different growth stages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 129:159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.12.009
  29. Zeng, X., Y. Ma, and L. Ma. 2007. Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11:976-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.003
  30. Zhou, X., L. Tan, W. Zhang, C. L. Lv, F. Zheng, R. Zhang, G. B. Du, B. J. Tang, and X. Y. Liu. 2011. Enzymatic hydrolysis lignin derived from corn stover as an intrinsic binder for bio-composites manufacture: Effect of fiber moisture content and pressing temperature on boards' properties. BioResour. 6:253-264.

Cited by

  1. Insight into Biomass as a Renewable Carbon Source for the Production of Succinic Acid and the Factors Affecting the Metabolic Flux toward Higher Succinate Yield vol.53, pp.42, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502178j
  2. Nutritional values of available ruminant feed resources in smallholder dairy farms in Rwanda vol.47, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0839-y
  3. Determining Nutritive Value of Cereal Crop Residues and Lentil (<i>Lens esculanta</i>) Straw for Ruminants vol.07, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2017.71003
  4. Investigation of the Spectroscopic Information on Functional Groups Related to Carbohydrates in Different Morphological Fractions of Corn Stover and Their Relationship to Nutrient Supply and Biodegradation Characteristics vol.65, pp.20, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00231
  5. Nutrient composition and in vitro fermentability of corn grain and stover harvested at different periods in Goesan, a mountainous area vol.61, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.1.18