DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between Farmers' Perceptions and Animal Welfare Standards in Sheep Farms

  • Kilic, I. ;
  • Bozkurt, Z.
  • Received : 2013.02.25
  • Accepted : 2013.05.26
  • Published : 2013.09.01

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the relationship between welfare standards in sheep farms and farmers' perceptions of factors affecting animal welfare. We developed a scale of 34 items to measure farmers' perceptions of animal welfare. We examined the relationships among variables in farmers' characteristics, our observations, and farmers' expressed perceptions through a t test, variance analysis and correlation analysis. Results of the research suggested that higher welfare standards for sheep exist on farms run by farmers who have a higher perception level of animal welfare. These farmers believed that personnel and shelter conditions were more effective than veterinary inspection, feeding and other factors in terms of animal welfare. In addition, we detected a significant relationship between the farmers' perceptions and their gender, educational level, whether they enjoyed their work, or whether they applied the custom of religious sacrifice. Our results showed that emotional and cognitive factors related to farmers' perceptions may offer opportunities for progress in the domain of animal welfare.

Keywords

Animal Welfare;Farmer' Perception;Perceptions-welfare Relationship;Sheep

References

  1. Bergonier, D., R. De Cremoux, R. Rupp, G. Lagriffoul, and X. Berthelot. 2003. Mastitis of dairy small ruminants. Vet. Res. 34:689-716. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003030
  2. Boivin, X., L. Marcantognini, P. Boulesteix, J. Godet, A. Brule, and I. Veissier. 2007. Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling. Anim. Welf. 16:147-151.
  3. Bokkers, E. A. M. 2006. Effects of interactions between humans and domesticated animals. In: Farming for Health (Ed. J. Hassink, and M. Van Dijk). Frontis: Wageningen, Netherlands. pp. 31-41.
  4. Breuer, K., P. H. Hemsworth, and C. J. Coleman. 2003. The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of nonlactating heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84:3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00146-1
  5. Broom, D. M. 1991. Animal welfare: Concepts and measurement. J. Anim. Sci. 69:4167-4175.
  6. Carless, S. A., S. Fewings-Hall, M. Hall, M. Hay, P. H. Hemsworth, and G. J. Coleman. 2007. Selecting unskilled and semi-skilled blue-collar workers: The criterion-related validity of the PDI-employment inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 15:335-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00392.x
  7. Caroprese, M. 2008. Sheep housing and welfare. Small Rumin. Res. 76:21-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.12.015
  8. Coleman, G. J. 2008. Public perceptions of animal welfare: an international perspective. AAWS08 International Animal Welfare Conference Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  9. Coleman, G. J., P. H. Hemsworth, and M. Hay. 1998. Predicting stockperson behaviour towards pigs fromattitudinal and job related variables and empathy. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58:63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01168-9
  10. Coleman, G. J., P. H. Hemsworth, M. Hay, and M. Cox. 2000. Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 66:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00073-8
  11. Coleman, G. J., M. McGregor, P. H. Hemsworth, J. Boyce, and S. Dowling. 2003. The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82:189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00057-1
  12. Davis, L. L. 1992. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl. Nurs. Res. 5:194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
  13. Dockes, A. C., and F. Kling-Eveillard. 2006. Farmers and advisers representations of animals and animal welfare. Livest. Sci. 103:243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.012
  14. Fraser, D. 2001. Farm animal production: changing agriculture in a changing culture. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 4:175-190 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0403_02
  15. Fraser, D., D. M. Weary, E. A. Pajor, and B. N. Milligan. 1997. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welf. 6:187-205.
  16. Fraser, D. 2005. Animal welfare and the intensification of animal production: An alternative interpretation. FAO Readings in Ethics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  17. Furnham, A., and A. Pinder. 1990. Young people's attitudes to experimentation on animals. Psychologist 10:444-448.
  18. Heleski, C. R., A. G. Mertig, and A. J. Zanella. 2004. Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2806-2814.
  19. Hemsworth, P. H. 2004. Human-livestock interaction. In: The Well-Being of Farm Animals, Challenges and Solutions (Ed. G. J. Benson, and B. E. Rollin). Blackwell Publishing: Iowa, USA. pp. 21-38.
  20. Hemsworth, P. H. 2007. Ethical stockmanship. Aust. Vet. J. 85:194-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00112.x
  21. Hemsworth, P. H. and J. L. Barnett. 1991. The effects of aversively handling pigs either individually or in groups on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 30:61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90085-C
  22. Hemsworth, P. H., A. Brand, and P. J. Willems. 1981. The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and their productivity. Livest. Prod. Sci. 8:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(81)90031-2
  23. Hemsworth, P. H., and G. J. Coleman. 1998. Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. CAB International: Wallingford, UK.
  24. Hemsworth, P. H., and G. J. Coleman. 2010. Managing poultry: human-bird interactions and their implications. In: The Welfare of Domestic Fowl and Other Captive Birds (Ed. I. J. H. Duncan, and P. Hawkins). Springer Dordrecht: Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 219-235.
  25. Hemsworth, P. H., G. J. Coleman, and J. L Barnett. 1998. The effects of improving human-animal interactions on the behaviour and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Proceedings of the Australian Society for the Study of Animal Behavior. 29th Annual Conference Palmerston North. New Zealand Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, New Zealand. pp. 15-16.
  26. Hemsworth, P. H., G. J. Coleman, J. L. Barnett, and S. Borg. 2000. Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2821-2831.
  27. Hemsworth, P. H., G. J. Coleman, J. L. Barnett, S. Borg, and S. Dowling. 2002. The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 80:68-78.
  28. Herzog, H. A. 2007. Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A Review. Anthrozoos 20:7-21. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687
  29. Herzog, H. A., Jr. N. S. Betchart, and R. B. Pittman. 1991. Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoos 4:184-191. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279391787057170
  30. Kauppinen, T., V. K. Mikko, and A. Valros. 2012. Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livest. Sci. 143:142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011
  31. Kellert, S. R. 1988. Human-animal interactions: A review of American attitudes toward wild and domestic animals in the twentieth century. In: Animals and people sharing the world (Ed. A. N. Rowan). University Press of New England: Hanover-New Hampshire, USA. pp. 137-175.
  32. Kellert, S. R., and J. K. Berry. 1987. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 15:363-371.
  33. Kielland, C., E. Skjerve, O. Osteras, and A. J. Zanella. 2010. Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. J. Dairy Sci. 93:2998-3006. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2899
  34. Knight, S. E., A. Vrij, J. Cherryman, and K. Nunkoosing. 2004. Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind. Anthrozoos 17:43-62. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279304786991945
  35. Kohler, F. 2001. Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. Report on National Survey, EU FAIR CT98-3678, The University of Kiel, Germany.
  36. Lensink, B. J., X. Fernandez, G. Cozzi, L. Florand, and I. Veissier. 2001. The influence of farmers' behavior on calves' reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 79:642-52.
  37. Likert, R. 1967. The human organization: Its Management and Value. McGrow-Hill: New York, USA.
  38. Maria, G. A. 2006. Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livest. Sci. 103:250-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.011
  39. Mounier, L., S. Colson, M. Roux, H. Dubroeucq, A. Boissy, S. Ingrand, and I. Veissier. 2006. Links between specialization in the finishing of bulls, mixing, farmers' attitudes towards animals and the production of finishing bulls: a survey on French farms. Anim. Sci. 82:561-568.
  40. Philpot, W. N., and S. C. Hickerson. 2000. Winning the fight against mastitis. Westphalia Surge, Naperville, USA.
  41. Pifer, L., K. Shimizu, and R. Pifer. 1994. Public attitudes toward animal research: Some international comparisons. Soc. Anim. 2:95-113. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853094X00126
  42. Sekaran, U. 2003. Research methods for business. John Wiley High Education Press: New York, USA.
  43. Sevi, A., S. Massa, G. Annicchiarico, S. Dell'aquila, and A. Muscio. 1999. Effect of stocking density on ewes milk yield, udder health and microenvironment. J. Dairy Res. 66:489-499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029999003726
  44. Sevi, A., L. Taibi, M. Albenzio, G. Annicchiarico, R. Marino, and M. Caroprese. 2003. Influence of ventilation regimen on microenvironment and on ewe welfare and milk yield in summer. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 2:197-212.
  45. Signal, T. D., and N. Taylor. 2006. Attitudes to animals: Demographics within a community sample. Soc. Anim. 14: 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006776778743
  46. Smith, G., and B. T. Grenfell. 1990. Population biology of pseudorabies in swine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 51:148-155.
  47. Te Velde, H., N. Aarts, and C. Van Woerkum. 2002. Dealing with ambivalence: farmers' and consumers' perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 15: 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015012403331
  48. Vanhonacker, F., W. Verbeke, E. Van Poucke, and F. A. M. Tuyttens. 2008. Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livest. Sci. 116:126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.017
  49. Windschnurer, I., C. Schmied, X. Boivin, and S. Waiblinger. 2008. Reliability and inter-test relationship of tests for on-farm assessment of dairy cows' relationship to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114:37-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.017
  50. Phillips, C. J. C. and A. P. Phillips. 2010. Attitudes of Australian sheep farmers to animal welfare. J. Int. Farm Manag. 5:1-26.

Cited by

  1. Attitudes of South Brazilian sheep farmers to animal welfare and sentience vol.47, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170450
  2. Animal Welfare Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Stockpersons in Kenya vol.31, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1482111