Analysis of Relative Importance of Key Performance Indicators for Center for Child-Care Foodservice Management through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

계층적 분석법(AHP)을 이용한 어린이급식관리지원센터 핵심성과지표(KPI)의 상대적 중요도 분석

  • Jeong, Yun-Hui (Deptartment of Food and Nutrition, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chae, In-Sook (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Jeju National University) ;
  • Yang, Il-Sun (Deptartment of Food and Nutrition, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Hye-Young (Institute of Symbiotic Life-TECH, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Young (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sangji University)
  • 정윤희 (연세대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 채인숙 (제주대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 양일선 (연세대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김혜영 (연세대학교 심바이오틱라이프텍연구원) ;
  • 이해영 (상지대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2013.03.11
  • Accepted : 2013.04.24
  • Published : 2013.04.30


The objectives of this study were to assign reasonability to importance of weight selection issue in key performance indicator for performance evaluation of Centers for Child-care Foodservice Management (CCFSM) developed by using Balanced Scorecard (BSC), to draw key performance indicator (KPI) by perspective and to analyze differences in recognition on importance. From September 25 to October 9, 2012, we conducted a questionnaire-based study via e-mail, targeting chiefs and team leaders of nationwide 21 CCFSMs (43 persons), officials of local governments where CCFSM was established (21 persons), officials of Korea Food and Drug Administration (2 persons) and foodservice management experts (27 persons) in order to estimate the relative importance on 4 perspectives and 14 KPIs and analyzed its results by using 61 collected data. The results showed that relative importance of perspectives was estimated in order of importance as follows: business performance (0.3519), customer (0.3393), resource (0.1557), learning and growth (0.1531). Relative importance of KPIs was in order of importance as follows: Evaluation of sanitary management level in child-care foodservice facilities (0.1327), Level of customer recognition and behavior improvement (0.1153), performances of round visiting inspection on foodservice, sanitary, safety management, and foodservice consulting (0.0913). Our results showed that the recognition differences exist on the relative importance of perspectives and KPIs between officials of CCFSM, KFDA, local government and foodservice management experts. These observations will form the basis for developing evaluation systems, and it is considered that performance indicators developed on this basis will suggest direction of operation which CCFSM will have to perform.


Supported by : Korea Food & Drug Administration


  1. Chang ML, Kim YB (2003): A study of the actual conditions of kindergarten meals program. Korean J Early Child Educ 23(3): 261-284
  2. Deanna MS, Magaret EB, Leanne HF, Suzanne SB (2007): Microbial evaluation of foodservice surfaces in texas child-care centers. J Am Diet Assoc 107(5): 854-859
  3. Harker PT, Vargas LG (1987): The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 33(11): 1383-1403
  4. Hwang DY, Kang KH, Gim KM, Baek MH (2008): Development of woman farmers center performance indicators by using the analytic hierarchy process. J Agricultural Extension Community Development 15(4): 599-619
  5. Jang YL (2012): Development of sustainable eco-tourism evaluation models and indicators: Focusing on the specialist of eco-tourism by AHP analysis. Korea Academic Society of Tourism Management 27(2): 455-475
  6. Jin JG (1998): Government productivity: Conceptual framework and measures. Korean Institute of Public Administration KIPA Research Report pp.0-117
  7. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992): The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70(1): 71-79
  8. Kim DK, Park YW, Lee SM (2007): Assessment of tourism resource development by the analytic hierarchy process: Focusing on the planning process. Korea J Tourism Hospitality Res 21(4): 5-18
  9. Kim EH (2010): A study on the development of performance evaluation model of the disabled welfare institutions using BSC and AHP. Korean Policy Sciences Review 14(4): 143-171
  10. Kim HK, Sung ES (2004): BSC Practice Manual. Sigmainsight
  11. Kim HJ, Lim HG, Kim DG (2011): The development on significancy and priority of KPI in contracted foodservice business in Korea using AHP. Korea J Tourism Hospitality Res 25(4):163-176
  12. Kim ST, Ahn SS, Lee HY (2011): A study on the development of a CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility) evaluation model: with application of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique. Acad Customer Satisfaction Management 13(1): 169-187
  13. Kim SY, Yang IS, Yi BS, Baek SH, Shin SY, Lee HY (2011): Childcare facility and kindergarten's demands on foodservice support by center for child-care foodservice management (CCFSM) in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. Korean J Community Nutr 16(6): 730- 739
  14. Kim HK, Kim HJ (2012): The development on significancy and priority of KPI in Korean coffee shop business using AHP. Korean J Hotel Administration 21(5): 195-205
  15. Kim JH, Kim WJ, Cho HK, Lee EY, Seo MW (2012): A study on the development of evaluation model for selecting a standard for DITA using AHP. IE Interfaces 25(1): 96-105
  16. Ko YS, Yoon HS, Lee JH (2004): Performance management in public service. Korea Development Institute
  17. Kwak TK, Lee HS, Yang IS (1991): Assessment of food service management practices in day care centers. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 7(4): 103-109
  18. Lee SG (2003): Consolidated performance management for local governments with the introduction of performance-based budgeting system: With special reference to the case of Seoul metropolitan government. Korean J Local Public Finance 8(1): 135-162
  19. Lee BS (2006): The survey on the foodservice management system of the child care centers in Ansan. Korean J Food Nutr 19(4): 435-447
  20. Lee MA, Yang IS, Yi BS, Kim HA, Park SH (2006): Analytic hierarchy process approach to estimate weights of evaluation categories for school food service program in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 39(1): 74-83
  21. Lee MS, Lee JY, Yoon SH (2006): Assessment of foodservice management performance at child care centers. Korean J Community Nutr 11(2): 229-239
  22. Lee WS (2012): Selection of indicator and establishment of system for a functional assessment of green space: Focused on forest green space. J Korean Env Res Tech 15(5): 31-48
  23. Park JH (2000): A study on civil administration service current and improvement method of central government. Korean Association for Public Administration Summer Consortium 2000: 553-568
  24. Park JH, Han HJ, L KJ, Park BS (2004): Analysis and improvement in performance evaluation system and actual administration. KIPA Research Report pp.1-162
  25. Park S, Hong YW, Na JK (2012): A method for selecting the evaluation index of defence R&D project by AHP. J Korean Data Inform Sci Soc 23(5): 961-970
  26. Park YM (2001): A study on performance indicator of disabled welfare service. Jeonnam Association for Public Administration 8: 413-431
  27. Saaty TL, Aczel J (1983): Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. J Methematical Psychology 27(1): 93-102
  28. Saaty TL (1994): Fundamental of decision making and prority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburg
  29. Saaty TL (1999): Decision making for leader: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS Publications, Pittsburg
  30. Sohn CY, Yang IS (2010): A analysis of relative importance of evaluation categories for hospital food service by analytic hierarchy process. J Korean Food Nutr 23(4): 470-477
  31. Staskel DM, Briley ME, Field LH, Barth SS (2007): Microbial evaluation of foodservice surfaces in texas child-care centers. J Am Diet Assoc 107(5): 854-859
  32. Um DH, Kim DS, Kim TC, Kim ES (2006): A study on the Development of green-tourism performance indicators by using BSC on rural village. J Korean Soc Rural Planning 12(3): 43-55
  33. Wholey JS, Hatry HP (1992): The case for performance monitoring. Public Adm Rev 52(6):604-610
  34. Yoon SJ, Kim KS, Kang ES (2005): Application strategies on the BSC model of public performance evaluation system. KIPA Research Report pp.1-149