A Study on the Adoption of Cyclotron Decommissioning Plan Criteria by the Analysis of Domestic Relocation and Abroad Dismantling Practices

국내 사이클로트론 이전 및 해외 해체 사례 분석을 통한 해체 계획 기준 도입 연구

  • Received : 2012.03.06
  • Accepted : 2013.04.26
  • Published : 2013.06.30


There are many reasons for decommissioning of cyclotron such as not only age-related deficiency, any serious wear or damage but also relocation, upgrade and changing mission. Decommission of cyclotron in USA and EU give rise to a lot of low-level radioactive waste and costs. Various research on decommissioning of particle accelerator have been carried to reduce the cost of decommissioning in USA and EU. In USA, the NRC require DFP (Decommissioning Funding Plan) to authorized licenser by 10 CFR Part 30.35. To resolve radioactive waste problem and reduce the estimated cost of cyclotron decommissioning, we should consider technical aspects (decommissioning procedures, decontamination techniques, etc.) and safety aspects(residual radioactivity, the expected dose, etc) for decommissioning. In this study, we analyzed practical information on the decommissioning of cyclotron in ANL (Argonne National Laboratory) and Belgium (EU). And we investigated the experience on the cyclotron relocation from SNUH (Seoul National University Hospital) to SKKU (Sungkyunkwan University). From these results, we provide the basic data for establishing of relevant standards on domestic cyclotron decommissioning. It is necessary to adopt the DFP for safe and economic decommissioning and waste recycling. These result could be utilized for the establishment on the standards and useful requirements.


Grant : 방사선원 안전성 검증 선진기술 개발


  1. 채종서. 의료용 사이클로트론 수출 기반 확대 방안 연구. 한국원자력의학원. 2007.
  2. 채종서. KOTRON-13과 상용 PET 사이클로트론의 최근 기술 동향. 핵의학 분자영상. 2005;39(1):1-8.
  3. 김상진. 원자력시설 영구정지 후 해체전 단계의 규제 절차 개발. 한국원자력안전기술원. 2011.
  4. 박승국, 최윤동, 문제권. 원자력발전소 시설특성 조사 및 해체폐기물량 예측 평가. 한국원자력연구원. 2012.
  5. European Commission Nuclear Safety and the Environment. Evaluation of the radiological and economic consequences of decommissioning particle accelerators (REPORT EUR 19151). March 1999.
  6. IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES NO. WS-G-2.2. Decommissioniing of medical, industrial and research facilities. IAEA. 1999.
  7. Carroll LR. Predicting long-lived, neutron-induced activation of concrete in a cyclotron vault. American Institute of Physics. 2001.
  8. Collins EL, Boyance J, Clark FR, Tinnin DJ, Williams A. Decontamination and decommissioning of the 60" cyclotron facility at Argonne National Laboratory-East project final report. ANL/D&D/01-1. 2011.
  9. U.S. NRC. Financial assurance and recordkeeping for decommissioning (10 CFR 30.35). Available in cfr/part030/part030-0035.html.
  10. U.S. NRC, Additional information concerning application for new license NRC documents (ML101260158). March 1. 2010.
  11. U.S. NRC, Re; Statement of intent (ML101260167), April 29. 2010.
  12. U.S. NRC, International Cyclotron, Inc. Notice of violation and proposed imposition of civil penalties - $7,000 - and order suspending licensed activities within 60 days (ML11347A244). December 23, 2001 available in docs/ML1134/ML11347A244.html.
  13. IAEA. Decommissioniing of small medical, industrial and research facilities (IAEA Technical Reports Series NO.414). 2003.
  14. 이재민, 양희창, 이수홍. 원전 해체에 의한 부지 및 폐기물 재이용 안전성 검증 기술 개발. 한국원자력안전기술원. 2009.
  15. 이재민, 양희창, 이수홍. 원전 해체에 의한 부지 및 폐기물 재이용 안전성 검증 기술 개발II. 한국원자력안전기술원. 2010.
  16. 원자력안전위원회 고시 제2012-29호, 방사성폐기물의 자체처분에 관한 규정. 01.2012.
  17. 서범경, 홍상범, 정관성. 대형 해체부지 재이용 및 대량 해체 폐기물 재활용 기준 및 검증지침 개발. 한국 원자력안전기술원. 2012.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Method of Cost Estimation for the Decommissioning Plan by the Analysis of Domestic Cyclotron Dismantling Practices vol.8, pp.3, 2014,