DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Trend of Technological Convergence

기술융합의 세계적 추세와 한국의 현황 비교분석

  • Lee, June Young (Division of Information Analysis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Kim, Dohyun (Division of Information Analysis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Ahn, Sejung (Division of Information Analysis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Jin (Division of Information Analysis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Moon, Yeong-Ho (Division of Information Analysis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
  • 이준영 (한국과학기술정보연구원 정보분석연구소) ;
  • 김도현 (한국과학기술정보연구원 정보분석연구소) ;
  • 안세정 (한국과학기술정보연구원 정보분석연구소) ;
  • 권오진 (한국과학기술정보연구원 정보분석연구소) ;
  • 문영호 (한국과학기술정보연구원 정보분석연구소)
  • Received : 2012.12.31
  • Accepted : 2013.03.27
  • Published : 2013.06.15

Abstract

In recent years, 'technological fusion or convergence' has drawn a lot of attention of innovation researchers and governmental policy makers as the driving force of technological innovation and industrial growth. There are, however, few studies on the analysis of longitudinal trends of technological convergence and its comparison between global and national level. In this study, with the citation data of about 18 million articles, we analyzed 1) the growth of representative convergence research areas, 2) the convergence of citing patterns between research fields, and 3) the changing trend of diversity index of all research fields. We conclude that technological convergence in korea shows the relatively strong orientation to the combination of neighboring fields than that of heterogenous fields in comparison to global trend. In particular, the relatively weak activity of cognitive science and the low level of mutual exchange between arts/humanities/social sciences and natural/engineering sciences in Korea are emphasized.

References

  1. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowtny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.
  2. Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., and Hukkinen, J. (2010), Analyzing Interdisciplinarity : Typology and indicators, Research Policy, 39(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
  3. Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology(KRCF) (2012), A Study on the Policies of Promoting Convergence Research of Science and Technology for Government-funded Research Institutes.
  4. Lee, K.-R. and Hwang, J.-T. (2005), A Study on Innovation System with Multi-technology Fusion, STEPI.
  5. Lee, S.-K., Cho, Y.-A., and Park, J.-B. (2009), Problems and Policy Implications of Technological Convergence of Korea, e-KIET Industry and Economy Information, 446.
  6. Leydesdorff, L. (2007a), Betweenness Centrality as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614
  7. Leydesdorff, L. (2007b), Top-down Decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index : Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. In : T. Braun (ed.), The Impact Factors of Scientific and Scholarly Journals : Its Use and Misuse, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 127-148.
  8. Leydesdorff, L. and Rafols, I. (2009), A Global lap of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories, Journal of the American Society for Inforation Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
  9. Leydesdorff, L. and Rafols, I. (2011), Indicators of the Interdisciplinarity of Journals : Diversity, Centrality, and Citations, Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.09.002
  10. Morillo, F., Bordons, M. and Gomez, I. (2003), Interdisciplinarity in Science : A Tentative Typology of Disciplines and Research Areas, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
  11. Porter, A. L. and Chubin, D. E. (1985), An Indicator of Cross-disciplinary Research, Scientometrics, 8(3/4), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934
  12. Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., and Perreault, M. (2007), Measuring Researcher Interdisciplinarity, Scientometrics, 72(1), 117-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5
  13. Porter, A. L. and Ismael, R. (2009), Is Science Becoming More Interdisciplinary? Measuring and Mapping Six Research Fields over Time, Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
  14. Porter, A. L. and Youtie, J. (2009), How Interdisciplinary is Nanotechnology?, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023-1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9607-0
  15. Rafols, I. and Meyer, M. (2009), Diversity and Network Coherence as Indicators of Interdisciplinarity : Case Studies in Bionanoscience, Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287.
  16. Rao, C. R. (1982), Diversity : Its Measurement, Decomposition, Apportionment and Analysis, Sankhya : The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 44(1), 1-22.
  17. Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., and van Raan, A. F. J. (2002), Impact Measures of Interdisciplinary Research in Physics, Scientometrics, 53(2), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014856625623
  18. Schmidt, M., Gläser, J., Havemann, F. and Heinz, M. (2006), A Methodological Study for Measuring the Diversity of Science, In International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics and Seventh COLLNET meeting, Nancy, France.
  19. Seo, D.-H. (2010), Rise and Developmental Plan of Industrial Convergence, Seoul Economic Bulletin 97(July), 16-28, The Seoul Institute.
  20. Stirling, A. (2007), A General Framework for Analysing Diversity in Science, Technology and Society, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(4), 707-719.
  21. Van den Besselaar, P. and Heimeriks, G. (2001), Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary-Concepts and Indicators, Proceedings of 8th Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 1-9.
  22. Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2010), Software survey : VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping, Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  23. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1999), The Interdisciplinary Nature of Science : Theoretical Framework and Bibliometric-empirical Approach, In Practising Interdisciplinarity, eds. P. Weingart and N. Stehr, 66-78, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  24. Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., and Börner, K. (2011), Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (IDR) : A Review of the Literature, Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
  25. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., and Noyons, E. C. M. (2010), A Unified Approach to Mapping and Clustering of Bibliometric Networks, Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
  26. Yang, H.-Y. and Jeong, S.-K. (2008), An Empirical Study on Convergence Research by Analyzing Knowledge Transmisson, R&D focus, 8, KISTEP.
  27. You, K.-M. (2006), A Proposal on Policy for Activating R&D of Convergence Technologies, KISTEP.