DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study of Discontinuous Innovation Based on Cusp Catastrophe Model : Implications for Predictive Risk Management

첨점 격변 모형에 기반 한 불연속 혁신의 유형별 사례 연구: 예측적 위기관리 측면

  • Received : 2013.03.12
  • Accepted : 2013.05.09
  • Published : 2013.05.31

Abstract

Managing uncertainty or discontinuity in an innovation is still a challenge to most companies. For sustainable corporate survival over the long term, one of the problems caused by discontinuous innovation is the innovator's dilemma. In specific, the dynamics between discontinuous innovation and incumbents inspires the interestof researchers and managers. This paper employs catastrophe theory as a theoretical basis to explain the driving force of new discontinuous change. In other words, we extract the control variables overcoming innovation dilemma by interpreting the dynamics of corporate strategy for discontinuous innovation from the perspective of catastrophe theory. First, we define four types of discontinuity such as technology discontinuity, product discontinuity, business discontinuity, and consumer preference discontinuity. Second, we analyze the dynamics of the competition between companies by interpreting the cases of discontinuous innovation. This analyzing process enables us to identify the control variable which can, in advance, respond to the discontinuous situation.

Keywords

Catastrophe Theory;Cusp Catastrophe Model;Discontinuous Innovation

References

  1. R.G. Cooper, New Product Development, McMaster University, 1995.
  2. S.C. Kim, A Dynamic Analysis of Corporate Strategy for Discontinuous Innovation for the Sustainable Growth, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Information Technology Management, Hanyang University, 2012.
  3. G. Dosi, "Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories", Research Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 147-162, 1982. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  4. T.F. Rothaermel, and W.L.C. Hill, "Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance", Organization Science, Vol.16, No.1, pp. 52-70, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0100 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0100
  5. S. Kaplan and M. Tripsas, "Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change", Research Policy, Vol. 37, pp. 790-805, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
  6. L.J. Funk, "Component, Systems and Technological Discontinuities", Long Range Planning. Vol. 41, pp. 555-573, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.001
  7. R.W. Jr. Veryzer, "Key Factors Affecting Customer Evaluation of Discontinuous New Products", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.15, pp.136-150, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1520136 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1520136
  8. A. Dhebar, "Complementarity, Compatibility, and Product Change: Breaking with Past?", Vol.12, pp. 136-152, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1220136
  9. M. Shifeng, Creating Discontinuous Innovation: The Case of Nintendo's Wii, Thesis, DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND TECH MGT, 2009.
  10. M. Tripas, "Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological change", Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 29, pp.79-97, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.1389 https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1389
  11. R. Lange, S.R. McDade, and A.T. Oliva, "The Estimation of a Cusp Model to Describe the Adoption of Word for Windows", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.21, pp. 15-32, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00051.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00051.x
  12. G. Robert, Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
  13. E.C. Zeeman, Catastrophe Theory: Selected Papers, 1972-1977, Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
  14. R. Lange, S.R. McDade, and A.T. Oliva, "Technological choice and network externalities: A catastrophe model analysis of firm software adoption for competing operating systems", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 12, pp. 29-57, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00028-X https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00028-X
  15. W.C. Smith, "Catastrophe Theory Analysis of Business Activity", Management Review, Vol. 69, p. 26, 1980.
  16. W. Dou and S. Ghose, " A dynamic nonlinear model of online retail competition using Cusp Catastrophe Theory", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, pp. 838-848, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.02.003
  17. A.R Alexander, R.G. Herbert, P.R. Deshon, and J.P. Hanges, "An Examination of Least-Squares Regression Modeling of Catastrophe Theory", Psychological Bullutin, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 366-374, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.366 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.366
  18. T. Oliva, "Technological choice under conditions of changing of changing network externality", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 5, pp. 279-298, 1994. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(94)90007-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(94)90007-8
  19. C.J. Lambe and R.E. Spekman, "Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.14, pp.102-116, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1420102 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1420102
  20. T.F. Rothaermel, "Technological Discontinuities and the Nature of Competition", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 12, pp.142-160, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713698467 https://doi.org/10.1080/713698467
  21. C.M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Cambridge. MA, Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
  22. P. Thomond, T. Herzberg, and F. Lettice, "Disruptive innovation: Removing the Innovators' Dilemma", Knowledge into Practice-British Academy of Management Annual Conference, Harrogate, UK, September, 2003.
  23. S. Droege and N.B. Johnson, "Limitations of low-end disruptive innovation strategies", The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 21, pp.242-259, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190903509555 https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903509555
  24. D. Yu and C.C. Hang, "A reflective review of Disruptive Innovation Theory", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 12, pp. 435-452, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x
  25. J. Liao, H. Welsch, and M. Stoica, "Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs", Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol.28, pp. 63-85, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00032 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00032
  26. M. Corso and L. Pellegrini, "Continuous and Discontinuous Innovation: Overcoming the Innovator Dilemma", Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.16, No.4, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00459.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00459.x
  27. J. Bessant, R. Lamming, H. Noke, and W. Phillips, "Managing Innovation beyond the Steady State", Technovation, Vol. 25, pp. 66-76, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.007
  28. C. O'Reilly and M. Tushman, "Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, pp.185-206, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
  29. J. Bessant, "Dealing with discontinuous innovation: the European experience", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, pp. 36-50, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.018059 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.018059
  30. E. Ehrnberg, "On the definition and measurement of technological discontinuities", Technovation, Vol. 15, pp. 437-452, 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)96593-I https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)96593-I
  31. V. Govindarajan and P.K. Kopalle, "Disruptiveness of Innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp.189-199, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.511 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.511
  32. S. Scholz, M. Meissner, and R. Decker, "Measuring Consumer Preferences for Complex Products: A Compositional Approach Based on Paired Comparisons", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XLVII, pp. 685-698, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.685 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.685
  33. Eisenhardt, "Building theories from case study research", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532-550, 1989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258557 https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
  34. S.X. Zeng, X.M. Xie, and C.M. Tam, "Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs", Technovation, Vol. 30, pp. 181-194, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
  35. R. Deeg, "Complementarity and institutional change in capitalist systems", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 611-630, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760701314433 https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701314433