DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A semi-active mass damping system for low- and mid-rise buildings

  • Lin, Pei-Yang (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering) ;
  • Lin, Tzu-Kang (Department of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung University) ;
  • Hwang, Jenn-Shin (Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2011.01.27
  • Accepted : 2012.02.22
  • Published : 2013.01.25

Abstract

A semi-active mass damping (SMD) system with magnetorheological (MR) dampers focusing on low- and mid-rise buildings is proposed in this paper. The main purpose of this study is to integrate the reliable characteristics of the traditional tuned mass damper (TMD) and the superior performance of the active mass damper (AMD) to the new system. In addition, the commonly seen solution of deploying dense seismic dampers throughout the structure nowadays to protect the main structure is also expected to switch to the developed SMD system on the roof with a similar reduction performance. In order to demonstrate this concept, a full-size three-story steel building representing a typical mid-rise building was used as the benchmark structure to verify its performance in real life. A numerical model with the interpolation technique integrated was first established to accurately predict the behavior of the MR dampers. The success of the method was proven through a performance test of the designated MR damper used in this research. With the support of the MR damper model, a specific control algorithm using a continuous-optimal control concept was then developed to protect the main structure while the response of the semi-active mass damper is discarded. The theoretical analysis and the experimental verification from a shaking table test both demonstrated the superior mitigation ability of the method. The proposed SMD system has been demonstrated to be readily implemented in practice.

References

  1. Bakre, S.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system", Struct. Control Health M., 14(3), 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.166
  2. Brock, J.E. (1946), "A note on the damped vibration absorber", J. Appl. Mech.-ASME, 64(4), A-284.
  3. Chang, C.C. and Henry, T.Y. Yang (1995), "Control of buildings using active tuned mass dampers", J. Eng. Mech., 121(3), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:3(355)
  4. Den Hartog, J.P. (1947), Mechanical vibrations (3rd edn), McGraw-Hill, New York.
  5. dSPACE Release 4.2 (2005), Solution for control, dSPACE GmBH, Germany
  6. Frahm, H. (1911), Device for damping of bodies, U.S. Patent No. 989, 958.
  7. Gregory, J. and Wereley, Norman M. (2000), "Seismic response of civil structures utilizing semi-active MR and ER bracing systems Hiemenz", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 10(8), 646-651.
  8. Kim, H.S., Roschke, P.N., Lin, P.Y. and Loh, C.H. (2006), "Neuro-fuzzy model of hybrid semi-active base isolation system with FPS bearing and MR damper", Eng. Struct., 28(7), 947-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.029
  9. Lee, S.H., Min, K.W., Chung, L., Lee, S.K., Lee, M.K., Hwang, J.S., Choi, S.B. and Lee, H.G. (2007), "Bracing systems for installation of MR dampers in a building structure", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 18(11), 1111-1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06072371
  10. Loh, C.H. and Chern, W.Y. (1994), "Seismic effectiveness of active tuned mass dampers for the control of flexible structures", Probab. Eng. Mech., 9(4), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(94)90014-0
  11. Mackriell, L.E., Kwok, K.C.S. and Samali, B. (1997), "Critical mode control of a wind-loaded tall building using an active tuned mass damper", Eng. Struct., 19(10), 834-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00172-7
  12. MATLAB, User's Guide (1992), The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA 01760.
  13. Nishitani, A. and Inoue, Y. (2001), "Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 30(11), 1565-1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.81
  14. Ormondroyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928), "The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber", Trans.-ASME, APM-50-7, 9-22.
  15. Pinkaew, T. and Fujino, Y. (2001), "Effectiveness of semi-active tuned mass dampers under harmonic excitation", Eng. Struct., 23(7), 850-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00091-2
  16. Qu, Z.Q., Shi, Y. and Hua, H. (2001), "A reduced-order modeling technique for tall buildings with active tuned mass damper", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 30(3), 360-362.
  17. Rabinow, J. (1948), "The magnetic fluid clutch", AIEE Trans., 67(2), 1308-1315.
  18. Renzi, E. and Serino, G. (2004), "Testing and modelling a semi-actively controlled steel frame structure equipped with MR dampers", Struct. Control Health M., 11(3), 189-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.36
  19. Ricciardelli, F., Occhiuzzi, A. and Clemente, P. (2000), "Semi-active tuned mass damper control strategy for wind-excited structures", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 88(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00024-6
  20. Rudinger, F. (2007), "Tuned mass damper with nonlinear viscous damping", J. Sound Vib., 300(3-5), 932-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.09.009
  21. Sakamoto, M., Kobori, T., Yamada, T. and Takahashi, M. (1996), "Practical applications of active and hybrid response control systems and their verifications by earthquake and strong wind observations", Proceedings of First World Conference on Structural Control, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  22. Setareh, M. (2001), "Use of semi-active tuned mass dampers for vibration control of force-excited structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 11(4), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.11.4.341
  23. Shook, D., Lin, P.Y., Lin, T.K. and Roschke, P.N. (2007), "A comparative study in the semi-active control of isolated structures", Smart Mater. Struct., 16(4), 1433-1446. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/058
  24. Spencer, B.F., Dyke, S.J., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1997), "Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers", J. Eng. Mech., 123(3), 230-252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)
  25. Yamamoto, M., Aizawa, S., Higashino, M. and Toyama, K. (2001), "Practical applications of active mass dampers with hydraulic actuator", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 30(11), 1697-1717. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.88
  26. Yang, J.N., Bobrow, J., Jabbari, F., Leavitt, J., Cheng, C.P. and Lin, P.Y. (2007), "Full-scale experimental verification of resetable semi-active stiffness dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 36(9), 1255-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.681
  27. Yang, R., Zhou, X. and Liu, X. (2002), "Seismic structural control using semi-active tuned mass dampers", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 1(1), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0014-0
  28. Zuo, L. and Nayfeh, S.A. (2005), "Optimization of the individual stiffness and damping parameters in multiple-tuned-mass-damper systems", J. Vib. Acoust., 127(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1855929

Cited by

  1. A leverage-type stiffness controllable mass damper for vibration mitigation of structures vol.24, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1896
  2. Effectiveness of design procedures for linear TMD installed on inelastic structures under pulse-like ground motion vol.10, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.1.239
  3. LQG design scheme for multiple vibration controllers in a data center facility vol.6, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.3.281
  4. Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method vol.51, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.4.547
  5. Analytical and experimental studies on building mass damper system with semi-active control device vol.25, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2154