DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Gender Differences in Responses towards Anti-Smoking Messages and Policy Implementation among Future Doctors in Malaysia

  • Published : 2013.01.31

Abstract

Background: Medical students' views may provide some direction for future policy considerations. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess gender differences in future doctors' receptiveness to currently implemented anti-smoking messages and the effectiveness of those messages. Materials and Methods: We administered a questionnaire to all students at a medical university in Malaysia, asking how frequently they noted anti-smoking policies, anti-smoking campaigns, and anti-smoking messages in schools. In addition, the questionnaire investigated most effective methods to convey these messages. Results: A total of 522 (59.7%) students responded. Students were least likely to approve of total bans on cigarettes and increasing the price of cigarettes, and most likely to approve of bans on use of cigarettes in public places and sales to individuals less than 16 years old. Approval of total bans on cigarettes was more common in female students than in males OR=0.39 (95%CI: 0.18-0.86). Furthermore, compared to the female students, the male students thought that printed media; OR=2.32 (95%CI: 1.31-4.10), radio; OR=1.93 (95%CI: 1.15-3.22) and the internet; OR=1.96 (95%CI: 1.15-3.33) were very effective at delivering anti-smoking messages. Conclusions: Gender differences existed in the future doctors' perception of the effectiveness of anti-smoking initiatives. Taking this gender difference into account may increase the receipt of anti-smoking messages in adolescents.

References

  1. Smith DR, Leggat PA (2007). An international review of tobacco smoking in the medical profession: 1974-2004. BMC Public Hlth, 7, 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-115
  2. Tee G, Hairi N, Hairi F (2012). Attitudes towards smoking and tobacco control among pre-clinical medical students in Malaysia [Short communication]. Int Tuberc Lung Dis, 16, 1126-8. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.11.0254
  3. Warren CW, Jones NR, Chauvin J (2008). Tobacco use and cessation counselling: cross-country. Data from the Global Health Professions Student Survey (GHPSS), 2005-7. Tob Control, 17, 238-47. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.023895
  4. Wee LH, West R, Bulgiba A, Shahab L (2011). Predictors of 3-month abstinence in smokers attending stop-smoking clinics in Malaysia. Nicotine Tob Res, 13, 151-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq221
  5. Xu X, Li B, Wang L (1994). Gender difference in smoking effects on adult pulmonary function. Eur Respir J, 7, 477-83. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.94.07030477
  6. Yasin S, Moy F, Retneswari M, Isahak M, Koh D (2012). Timing and risk factors associated with relapse among smokers attempting to quit in Malaysia. Int Tuberc Lung Dis, 16, 980-5. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.11.0748
  7. Yasin SM, Retneswari M, Moy FM, Koh D, Isahak M (2011). Smokers can quit regardless of motivation stage in a worksite smoking cessation programme in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2193-8.
  8. Zarihah Z, Foong K, Salehuddin A, Kalthom SU (2007). The third national health morbidity survey: smoking and alcohol among adults. kuala lumpur: institute of public health.
  9. Asbridge M (2004). Public place restrictions on smoking in Canada: assessing the role of the state, media, science and public health advocacy. Soc Sci Med, 58, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00154-0
  10. Assunta M, Chapman S (2004a). Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity. Tob Control, 13, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2003.005447
  11. Assunta M, Chapman S (2004b). A mire of highly subjective and ineffective voluntary guidelines: tobacco industry efforts to thwart tobacco control in Malaysia. Tob Control, 132, 43-50.
  12. Brown JD, Witherspoon EM (2002). The mass media and American adolescents' health. J Adolescent Hlth, 31, 153-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00507-4
  13. Flynn BS, Worden, JK, Bunn JY, et al (2010). Mass media interventions to reduce youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Hlth, 39, 53.
  14. Forsyth SR, Kennedy C, Malone RE (2012). The effect of the internet on teen and young adult tobacco use: a literature review. J Pediatr Health Care.
  15. Gainroj MP, Jarupum MJ, Konkaew MT, et al (2010). International tobacco control southeast asia survey.
  16. Janik-Koncewicz K, Zatonski T, Poltyn-Zaradna K, et al (2012). An attempt to assess knowledge about tobacco dependence among students at the Medical University in Wroclaw. Ann Agric Environ Med, 19, 345.
  17. Lundborg P, Andersson H (2008). Gender, risk perceptions, and smoking behavior. J Hlth Econ, 27, 1299-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.003
  18. Max W (2001). The financial impact of smoking on healthrelated costs: a review of the literature. Am J Hlth Promot, 15, 321-31. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.321
  19. Organization WH (2011). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: Warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva, Switzerland.
  20. Pampel FC (2002). Cigarette use and the narrowing sex differential in mortality. Population Development Review, 28, 77-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00077.x
  21. Risch HA, Howe GR, Jain M, et al (1993). Are female smokers at higher risk for lung cancer than male smokers? A casecontrol analysis by histologic type. Am J Epidemiol, 138, 281-93.
  22. Siegel M, Biener L (2000). The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health, 90, 380. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.3.380

Cited by

  1. Smoking Stage Relations to Peer, School and Parental Factors among Secondary School Students in Kinta, Perak vol.14, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.3483