젖소분뇨와 Crude Glycerin의 통합혐기소화

Anaerobic Co-digestion of Dairy Manure and Crude Glycerin

  • 이새민 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학 동물자원과학전공) ;
  • 이상락 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학 동물자원과학전공)
  • Lee, Sae-Min (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Rak (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.25
  • 심사 : 2013.12.21
  • 발행 : 2013.12.30


In this study, the mixture ratio included 20% (GLY 20), 40% (GLY 40), and 60% (GLY 60) based on VS with the control group (GLY 0) with no crude glycerin added. Maintaining stable pH, GLY 20 and GLY 0 showed the highest total output of biogas (1.24 L/L/d) and methane(0.78 L/L/d) as its volatile solids reduction rate was 53.56%. In case of GLY 40 and GLY 60, their pH was rapidly reduced after seven days of the study, so that their anaerobic digestion was all stopped.In the results of the study, it is desirable to add crude glycerin less than 20%, and it would be necessary to have the future researches on more detailed organic loading rate of each ratio, and analysis on economic feasibility.



연구 과제 주관 기관 : 농촌진흥청


  1. APHA, 1980. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  2. Bae, J.H., 2009. Economics and Environmental Assessment of biodiesel dissemination policy. 09-01, 1-61.
  3. Castrillon, L., Fernandez-Nava, Y., Ormaechea, P., Maranon, E., 2012. Methane production from cattle manure supplemented with crude glycerin from the biodiesel industry in CSTR and IBR. Bioresource technology.
  4. Chaney, A.L., Marbach, E.P., 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical chemistry. 8(2), 130-132.
  5. Chen, X., Romano, R.T., Zhang, R., Kim, H., 2008. Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and glycerin. In ASABE Annual International Meeting, Paper (No. 084496).
  6. Chynoweth, D.P., Wilkie, A.C., Owens, J.M., 1998. Anaerobic processing of piggery wastes: A review. In ASAE Annual International Meeting.
  7. Demirbas, A., 2007. Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy. 35(9), 4661-4670.
  8. Kizilkaya, R., Bayrakli, B., 2005. Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities. Applied Soil Ecology. 30(3), 192-202.
  9. Koster, I., Lettinga, G., 1988. Anaerobic digestion at extreme ammonia concentrations. Biological Wastes. 25(1), 51-59.
  10. Li, R., Chen, S., Li, X., SaifullahLar, J., He, Y., Zhu, B., 2009. Anaerobic codigestion of kitchen waste with cattle manure for biogas production. Energy & Fuels. 23(4), 2225-2228.
  11. Mata-Alvarez, J., Mace, S., Llabres, P., 2000. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresource technology. 74(1), 3-16.
  12. Pagliaro, M., Rossi, M., 2008. The future of glycerol: new usages for a versatile raw material (Vol. 1). Royal Society of Chemistry.
  13. Sakar, S., Yetilmezsoy, K., Kocak, E., 2009. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment - a literature review. Waste management & research. 27(1), 3-18.
  14. Santibanez, C., Varnero, M.T., Bustamante, M., 2011. Residual glycerol from biodiesel manufacturing, waste or potential source of bioenergy: A review. Chilean journal of agricultural research. 71(3), 469-475.
  15. Yazdani, S.S., Gonzalez, R., 2007. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Current opinion in biotechnology. 18(3), 213-219.