DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soil Classification of Anthropogenic Soils in a Remodeled Area Using Soil Taxonomy and World Reference Base for Soil Resources

  • Lee, Seung-Been (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Chun, Hyen-Chung (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Jun (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Hyun, Byung-Keun (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Song, Kwan-Cheol (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Zhang, Yong-Seon (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Sonn, Yeon-Kyu (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Chan-Won (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
  • Received : 2013.11.07
  • Accepted : 2013.11.24
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

In Soil Taxonomy system, anthropogenic soils are still classified as Entisols since the International Classification Committee for Anthropogenic Soils is in the process of classifying anthropogenic soils as new orders. In reality, it is difficult to characterize anthropogenic soils because Soil Taxonomy (ST) system does not distinguish between natural and anthropogenic Entisols. On the other hand, World Reference Base for soil resources (WRB) considers human impacts on soils and contains an independent category of anthropogenic soils, which makes easier to understand anthropogenic soil characteristics than Soil Taxonomy system. A remodeled paddy field (Gasan) was selected to classify by ST and WRB. Soil samples were taken to analyze chemical and physical properties. Based on the results of the analyses, the ST system classified Gasan as coarse loamy, mixed, mesic, Aquic Udorthents while the WRB did as Stagnic Urbic Technosols (Oxyaquic, Arenic). As a conclusion, the WRB classification information of the anthropogenic provides more detail characteristics of the anthropogenic soils.

Keywords

Soil taxonomy;WRB;Anthropogenic soils;Soil classification

Acknowledgement

Supported by : NAAS

References

  1. Dudal, R., F.O. Nachtergaele, and M.F. Purnell. 2002. The human factor of soil formation, pp. 14-21S, Thailand.
  2. Hur, S.O., S.H. Jeon, K.H. Han, H.R. Jo, Y.K. Sonn, S.K. Ha, J.G. Kim, and N.W. Kim. 2010. Application of analysis models on soil water retention characteristics in anthropogenic soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. & Fert. 43(6):823-827.
  3. IUSS Working Group WRB. 2007. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.
  4. Jabiol, B., A. Zanella, J. Ponge, G. Sartori, M. Englisch, B. van Delft, R. de Waal, and R. Bayon. 2013. A proposal for including humus forms in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB-FAO). Geoderma. 192:286-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.002
  5. Jung, Y.T. 1996. Application of Soil Taxonomy: Advantage and Disadvantage of American Soil Taxonomy. Korean J. Soil Sci. & Fert. 29(2):207-210.
  6. Jung, Y.T. 1998. Introduction of new order on Soil Taxonomy. Korean J. Soil Sci. & Fert. 31(3):309-313.
  7. Moreand, D.T. 2010. The World Reference Base for Soils (WRB) and Soil Taxonomy: an initial appraisal of their application to the soils of the Northern Rivers of New South Wales. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. Brisbane, Australia.
  8. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 1973. Soil Survey Manual. part 1. Field Survey & Classification. Suwon. Korea.
  9. RDA. 1988. Methods of soil chemical analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
  10. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd Edition. USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 436. (Govt. Printer: Washington DC).
  11. Sonn, Y.K., C.W. Park, Y.S. Zhang, B.G. Hyun, K.C. Song, and E.S. Yoon. 2011. Characteristics of soils distributed on the "Dokdo" island in south Korea. Korean J. Soil Sci. & Fert. 45(6):897-899
  12. Sonn, Y.K., Y.S. Zhang, C.W. Park, Y.H. Moon, B.G. Hyun, K.C. Song, and H.J. Chun. 2011. A comparison of spatial variation on anthropogenic soils. Korean J. Soil Sci. & Fert. 44(2):187-193. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.2.187
  13. USDA, Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd ed. Agric. Handbook 436. USDA-NRCS. CRC Press, Boca Paton, Fla., USA.
  14. USDA, NRCS. 2004. Soil survey laborarory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigation Report No. 42. Version 4.0. USDANRCS, Washington.
  15. USDA, Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 10th ed. USDA NRCS, Blacksbury, Virginia.

Cited by

  1. Soil Physico-chemical Properties by Land Use of Anthropogenic Soils Dredged from River Basins vol.49, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.4.341
  2. Classification of Anthropogenic Soil "Ingwan" Series vol.48, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.5.535