The Acid Buffer Capacity of a Horizons in Young Residual Entisols in Korea

  • Zhang, Yong-Seon (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Sonn, Yeon-Kyu (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Gye-Jun (National Institute of Highland Agriculture, RDA) ;
  • Han, Kyung-Hwa (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Hee-Rae (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA)
  • Received : 2013.11.06
  • Accepted : 2013.11.22
  • Published : 2013.12.31


pH buffer capacities (pHBC, $cmol_c\;kg^{-1}\;pH^{-1}$) of 6 residual Entisols derived from granite, granite-gneiss, limestone, sandstone, shale, and basalt in Korea were studied. Soil acidity may become a problem if the soil pH is reduced to critical levels when nutrient cycles are unbalanced (especially N, C and S). The relation between the pHBC and the physico-chemical properties of the 6 soils was also studied. In the A horizons of all the soils except Euiseong series developed from sandstone, the contents of clay, organic matter and cation exchange capacity (CEC) were higher than those of C horizon, but bulk density and pH were lower than C horizon. Clay content of Euiseong series decreased with soil depth, which might be caused by the elluviation. The soils developed from granite, granite-gneiss and sandstone have a higher $SiO_2$ content than those developed from basalt and limestone. The contents of $Fe_2O_3$ and MgO were high in the soils from developed from basalt, limestone and shale comparing with the soils from granite, granite-gneiss and sandstone. The soils from basalt and limestone showed higher values of ignition loss than those from the other parent rocks. The pHBC of the soils was ranged from 1.8 to 3.2 $cmol_c\;kg^{-1}\;pH^{-1}$ showing as follows : basalt, limestone > shale, granite-gneiss > granite sandstone.


Grant : 농업환경변화 대응 작물근권 및 지하수위 기술설정

Supported by : 국립농업과학원


  1. Aitkin, R.L., P.W. Moody, and P.G. McKinley. 1990. Lime requirement of acidic Queensland soils. Australian J. Soil. Res. 28:695-715.
  2. Brown A.G., L. Cooper, C.R. Salisbury, and D.N. Smith. 2001. Late Holocene channel changes of the middle trent: channel response to a thousand-year flood record. Geomorphology 39:69-82.
  3. Dikaiakos J.G., C.G. Tsitouris, P.A. Siskos, D.A. Melissos, and P.T. Nastos. 1990. Rainwater composition in Athens, Greece, Atmos. Environ. 24:171-176.
  4. DOE. 1990. Acid deposition in the United Kingdom 1986-1988. Third report of the United Kingdom review group on acid rain (Chairman J.G. Irwin). Department of the Environment, Warren Spring Laboratory.
  5. Emmanuel, D. and P.R. Ryan. 1995. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants. Plant physiology, 107:315-321.
  6. Gundersen, P., B.A. Emmettb, O.J. Kjonaasc, C.J. Koopmansd, and I.A. Tietemad. 1995. Impact of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen cycling in forests: a synthesis of NITREX data. Forest Ecology and Management. 71:153-161.
  7. Helyar K.R., P.D. Cregan, and D.L. Godyn. 1990. Soil acidity in New South Wales-current pH values and estimates of acidification rates. Australian J. Soil Res. 28:523-537.
  8. Hyeon, G.S., C.S. Park, S.J. Jung, S.K. Rim, and K.T. Um. 1991. Soil CEC for textural classes in Korea. Korean J. Soil. Sci. Fert. 24:10-16.
  9. Jo, I.S., B.K. Hur, L.Y. Kim, and S.J. Cho. 1985. A study on the correlations among the physical and chemical properties of soils in Korea. Korean J. Soil. Sci. Fert. 18:134-139.
  10. Kang Y.P. 1973. A study of red soils developed on granite gneiss. J. Korean Geo. Soc. 1:64-92.
  11. Lindroos, A.J., T. Brugger, J. Derome, and K. Derome. 2003. The weathering of mineral soil by natural soil solutions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 149:269-279.
  12. Matzner, E. and D. Murach. 1995. Soil changed induced by air pollutant deposition and their implication for forest in Central Europe. Water Air Soil Pollut. 85:63-73.
  13. NIAST. 2000. Analytical methods of soil and plant. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Administration. Suwon, Korea.
  14. Saxena, A., U.C. Kulshrestha, N. Kumar, K.M. Kumari, and S.S. Srivastava. 1996. Characterization of precipitation at Agra, Atmos. Environ. 30:3405-3412.
  15. Shin A.Y., M.Y. Sung, J.S. Choi, J.S. Son, S.A. Roh, J.Y. Ahn, J.S. Han, and G.W. Lee. 2012. A study on the acid deposition of inorganic ions and flux in Seoul, Ganghwa, Incheon. 2008. J. Korean. Soc. Urban Environ. 12:15-22.
  16. Song, K.H., Y.N. Park., Y.S. Chung, and K.T. Park. 1992. A preliminary study on the acidity of precipitation in the rural area of Choongbook province. Korean J. Atmos. Environ. 1:38-44.
  17. Streets, D.G., N.Y. Tsai, H. Akimoto, and K. Oka. 2001. Trends in emissions of acidifying species in Asia. 1985-1997. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 130:187-192.
  18. Tiktak, A., J.M Hans, and van Grinsven. 1995. Review of sixteen forest-soil-atmosphere models. Ecological Modelling. 83:35-53.
  19. Ulrich. B. 1995. The history and possible causes of forest decline in Central Europe, with particular attention to the German situation. Environ. Rev. 3:262-276.
  20. Um, M.H. and T.S. Kim. 1991. Genesis and characteristics of the soil clay minerals derived from major parent rocks in Korea: II. Physical and chemical properties of the whole soils. Korean J. Soil. Sci. Fert. 24:79-85.
  21. USDA, Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Agricultural Handbook 18. USDA-NRCS, Washington.
  22. USDA, Soil Survey Staff. 2012. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods. SSIR No. 42 . USDA-NRCS, Washington.
  23. Wada, S.I. and K. Wada. 1985. Characteristics and exchangeable cation status of Korea Ultisols and Alfisols and Thai Ultisols and Oxisols. J. Soil Sci. 36:21-29.