Effects of an Anti-Smoking Program to Prevent Lung Cancer among Urban Aboriginals in Taiwan

  • Lin, Mei-Hsiang (Chang Gung University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Huang, Sheu-Jen (National Taiwan Normal University) ;
  • Shih, Whei-Mei Jean (Chang Gung University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Wang, Pao-Yu (Landseed Hospital) ;
  • Lin, Li-Hui (National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences) ;
  • Hsu, Hsiu-Chin (Chang Gung University of Science and Technology)
  • Published : 2013.11.30


Background and Purpose: Indigenous people who leave their hometowns and move to the city to earn a living became urban aboriginals. During the process of adapting to urban living situations, they may use various coping strategies such as smoking to overcome their stress. Therefore, it is crucial to provide health education including smoking prevention, increasing knowledge regarding of tobacco hazard, self-efficacy of anti-smoking, and adjusting smoking behavior so as to empower their anti-smoking motivation to prevent lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of an anti-smoking program on urban aboriginals in Taiwan. Methods: A quasi-experimental study design with purposeful sampling was employed. A total of 125 aboriginal subjects were recruited from two local churches at Shu Lin area in northern Taiwan. Subjects were divided into an experimental group (n =64 ) and a control group (n = 61). Both took pre-tests in order to set baseline values, and only the experimental group participated for 3-weeks in the anti-smoking program classes. Both groups took post-tests immediately after the intervention in order to evaluate the immediate effects of the teaching program, and a follow-up test was conducted four weeks after the intervention. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANCOVA, and repeat measure ANCOVA. Results: After controlling for confounding variables, the results showed that there were statistically significant differences in the self-efficacy of anti-smoking and smoking behavior between experimental and control groups in the immediately post-test and the follow-up test (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant differences in the recognition of hazards of smoking at eiter time point. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The findings of this study revealed that the anti-smoking program effectively improved self-efficacy of anti-smoking, and decreased the smoking behavior in urban aboriginals. They provide useful information as a reference regarding of aboriginal health promotion to health providers. It is imperative that anti-smoking be reinforced for those regular smokers to prevent induction of lung cancer.


Lung cancer;urban aboriginals;anti-smoking program;smoking behavior;Taiwan


  1. Andrew S, Sally K, Elizabeth R, Sean H (2001). The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health, 91, 265-9.
  2. Anonymous (2010). World No Tobacco Day. MMWR, 59, 613.
  3. Aveyard P, Cheng KK, Almond J, et al (1999). Cluster randomized controlled trial of expert system based on the transtheoretical ("stage of change")model for smoking prevention. BMJ, 319, 948-3.
  4. Barton SS (2004). Narrative inquiry: Locating aboriginal epistemology in a relational methodology. J Adv Nurs, 45, 519-6.
  5. Boyle T, Shepherd1 CCJ, Pearson1 G, et al (2009). Awareness and impact of the ‘Bubblewrap’ advertising campaign among aboriginal smokers in Western Australia. Tob Control, 18, 1-10.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). Cigarette smoking among adults- United States, 2007. MMWR, 57, 1221-6.
  7. Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New Engl J Med, 358, 2249-8.
  8. Cornuz J, Humair J, Seematter L, Stoianov R, Stalder H (2002). Efficacy of resident training in smoking cessation: A randomized, controlled trial of a program based on application of behavioral theory and practice with standardize patients. Ann Intern Med, 136, 429-7.
  9. Council of Indigenous Peoples (2013). Indigenous people population statistical data. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://www. apc. gov. tw/ main/ docList/ docList. jsp? cateID= A000297& linkParent= 49 & linkSelf= 161 & linkRoot = 4 (Original work published in Chinese)
  10. Dijkstra A, Vries H (2000). Subtypes of precontemplating smokers defined by different ling-term plans to change their smoking behavior. Health Educ Res, 15, 423-4.
  11. Dyck R, Klomp H, Turnell R, Boctor M (2002). A comparison of rates, risk factors, and outcomes of gestational diabetes between aboriginal and non-aboriginal women in the Saskatoon health district. Diabetes Care, 25, 487-3.
  12. Hajek P, Taylor T, Mills P (2002). Brief intervention during hospital admission to help patients to give up smoking after myocardial infarction and bypass surgery: randomized controlled trial. BMJ, 324, 87-9.
  13. Herzog TA (2007). Are the stages of change for smokers qualitatively distinct? An analysis using an adolescent sample. Psychol Addict Behav, 21, 120-5.
  14. Kegler MC, Cleaver VL, Yazzie-Valencia M (2000). An exploration of the influence of family on cigarette smoking among American Indian adolescences. Health Educ Res, 15, 547-7.
  15. Kotalik J (2009). Aboriginal health care in Canada - bioethics perspective. Formos J Med Humanit, 10, 119-5.
  16. MacPherson L, Myers M, Johnson M(2006). Adolescent definitions of change in smoking behavior: An investigation. Nicoine Tob Res, 8, 683-7.
  17. McAlister AL, Perry CL, Parcel GS (2008). Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, BK, Rimer , K Viswanth (Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research & Practice (4th ed., pp 167-185). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  18. McGraw SA, Stone EJ, Osganian SK, Elder JP, Perry CL., Johnson CC (1994). Design of process evaluation within the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health (CATCH). Health Educ Q, 2, s5-s6.
  19. Paavola M, Vartiainen E, Puska P (2001). Smoking cessation between teenage years and adulthood. Health Educ Res, 16, 49-7.
  20. Rasmussen C, Baydala L (2004). Learning patterns and education of aboriginal children: A review of the literature. Can J Native Stud, 24, 317-2.
  21. Rigotti N, Arnsten J, McKool K, et al (1997). Efficacy of a smoking cessation program for hospital patients. Int Arch Med, 157, 2653-60.
  22. Rudatsikira1 E, Muula AS, Siziya S, Mataya RH (2008). Correlates of cigarette smoking among school-going adolescents in Thailand: findings from the Thai global youth tobacco survey 2005. Int Arch Med, 1, 1-8.
  23. Serrano EL, Anderson JE (2004). The evaluation of food pyramid games, a bilingual computer nutrition education program for Latino youth. JFCSE, 22, 1-6.
  24. Sidney CZ (1997). Health gap between aboriginal and non-aboriginal people is wildering. Br Med J, 314, 1148.
  25. Stairs A (1995). Learning processes and teaching roles in native education: Culture base and cultural brokerage. In M Battiste, J Barman (Eds), The circle unfold (p39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  26. Sue RL, Yang YH, Tseng TY (2006). Intervention study of the oral health education on the knowledge and behavior of aboriginal junior high school students. CJDR, 25, 103-1.
  27. William A, Ann D, Patricia H, Alain J (2001). Effectiveness of high school smoking cessation program. Pediatrics, 107, 50-60.
  28. World Health Organization (2009). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from http:// www. who. int/ tobacco/ mpower/ en.
  29. Young TK (2003). Review of research on aboriginal populations in Canada: relevance to their health needs. Br Med J, 327, 419-32.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Lung Cancer in Jianghan Plain vol.06, pp.12, 2014,
  2. Effect on Smoking Quit Rate of Telling Smokers their Health Risk Appraisal in Terms of Health Age: A Randomized Control Trial vol.15, pp.12, 2014,