DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is the Phone Call the Most Effective Method for Recall in Cervical Cancer Screening? - Results from a Randomised Control Trial

  • Rashid, Rima Marhayu Abdul (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya) ;
  • Mohamed, Majdah (Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia) ;
  • Hamid, Zaleha Abdul (Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia) ;
  • Dahlui, Maznah (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya)
  • Published : 2013.10.30

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of different methods of recall for repeat Pap smear among women who had normal smears in the previous screening. Design: Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting: All community clinics in Klang under the Ministry of Health Malaysia. Participants: Women of Klang who attended cervical screening and had a normal Pap smear in the previous year, and were due for a repeat smear were recruited and randomly assigned to four different methods of recall for repeat smear. Intervention: The recall methods given to the women to remind them for a repeat smear were either by postal letter, registered letter, short message by phone (SMS) or phone call. Main Outcome Measures: Number and percentage of women who responded to the recall within 8 weeks after they had received the recall, irrespective whether they had Pap test conducted. Also the numbers of women in each recall method that came for repeat Pap smear. Results: The rates of recall messages reaching the women when using letter, registered letter, SMS and phone calls were 79%, 87%, 66% and 68%, respectively. However, the positive responses to recall by letter, registered letter, phone messages and telephone call were 23.9%, 23.0%, 32.9% and 50.9%, respectively (p<0.05). Furthermore, more women who received recall by phone call had been screened (p<0.05) compared to those who received recall by postal letter (OR=2.38, CI=1.56-3.62). Conclusion: Both the usual way of sending letters and registered letters had higher chances of reaching patients compared to using phone either for sending messages or calling. The response to the recall method and uptake of repeat smear, however, were highest via phone call, indicating the importance of direct communication.

Keywords

Cervical cancer;screening;recall;intervention;uptake;Malaysia

References

  1. Buehler SK, Parsons WL (1997). Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ, 157, 521-6.
  2. Canfell K, Sitas F, Beral V (2006). Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortality. Med J Aust, 185, 482-6.
  3. Eaker S, Adami HO, Granath F, Wilander E, Sparen P (2004). A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 13, 346-54.
  4. McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W (1989). Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. J Fam Pract, 28, 420-4.
  5. Pierce M, Lundy S, Palanisamy A, Winning S, King J (1989). Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening. BMJ, 299, 160-2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6692.160
  6. Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R (2001). Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ, 79, 954-62.
  7. The Third National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS III) (2006). Institute for Public Health Malaysia. Ministry of Health Malaysia.
  8. Vogt TM, Glass A, Glasgow RE, La Chance PA, Lichtenstein E (2003). The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 12, 789-98. https://doi.org/10.1089/154099903322447756
  9. WHO (2005). IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. (Vol. 10.). Lyon, France.

Cited by

  1. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.12, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183924
  2. Text Messaging Interventions on Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review vol.19, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7893
  3. The ‘Be Cancer Alert Campaign’: protocol to evaluate a mass media campaign to raise awareness about breast and colorectal cancer in Malaysia vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4769-8