A Study on Community Perceptions of Common Cancers, Determinants of Community Behaviour and Program Implementation in New Delhi, India

  • Seth, Tulika (Department of Hematology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kotwal, Atul (Armed Forces Medical College) ;
  • Thakur, Rakesh Kumar (Department of Preventive Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Ganguly, K.K. (Indian Council of Medical Research)
  • Published : 2012.06.30


Assessment of perceptions of the community, the determinants and development of their behavior regarding common malignancies, helps in establishing evidence-based activities for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. However information on this important aspect is lacking in our country. Qualitative methods were here used to obtain information through in depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with all categories of identified stakeholders. Most were unaware of the activities of the cancer control program. Even the providers were not fully conversant. All respondents mentioned lack of diagnostic and treatment facilities in government, primary and secondary level facilities. Perceptions of different categories of stakeholders regarding why many community members did not attend screening camps and other services reflect the determinants of community behavior, acting independently as well as in combination. The cancer control program was thought to be restricted only to some private facilities and overcrowded government tertiary care facilities where the visits were time consuming. Almost all the facilities were considered curative oriented. Issues of supervision, monitoring and feedback were inadequately addressed by providers who were inadequately trained in many program activities. The program lacked effective planning, coordination and appropriate implementation at the grass roots level in Delhi. Social mobilization was grossly inadequate, as most of the community members were unaware of the existence of the program. Misconceptions about the risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment were common amongst community members as well as many of the providers. Thus the national cancer control program in our country needs further community participation and social mobilization. Accessibility, availability, acceptability and affordability of various preventive, curative and rehabilitative activities, as well as intersectoral coordination, training, supervision and monitoring of program activities, all need to be addressed to ensure the success of this important public health program.


  1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Allen J D, Kennedy M, Wilson-Glover A, Gilligan T D (2007). African-American men's perceptions about prostate cancer: implications for designing educational interventions. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 2189-0.
  3. Akpınar YY, Baykan Z, Nacar M, Gun I, Cetinkaya F (2011). Knowledge, Attitude about breast cancer and practice of breast cancer screening among female health care professionals: A study from Turkey. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 12, 3063-8.
  4. Anwar M, Green J, Norris P (2012). Health-seeking behaviour in Pakistan: A narrative review of the existing literature, Public Health, doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2012.02.006
  5. Aswathy S, Sumithra S, Valsala L S, et al (2006). Self reported morbidity and awareness regarding common cancers in elderly women. J Communicable Dis, 38, 106-1.
  6. Baghurst KI, Baghurst PA, Record SJ (1992). Public perceptions of the role of dietary and other environmental factors in cancer causation or prevention. J Epidemiol Community Health, 46, 120-6.
  7. Bandura A (1997). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-5.
  8. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al (1999). A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy. Ann Oncol, 10, 839-6.
  9. Champion VL (1988). Attitudinal variables related to intention, frequency and proficiency of breast self-examination in women 35 and over. Res Nursing Health, 11, 283-1.
  10. Consedine NS, Adjei BA, Ramirez PM, Mckiernan JM (2008). An object lesson: source determines the relations that trait anxiety, prostate cancer worry, and screening fear hold with prostate screening frequency. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 17, 1631-9.
  11. Donati S, Giambi C, Declich S, et al (2012). Knowledge, attitude and practice in primary and secondary cervical cancer prevention among young adult Italian women. Vaccine, 30, 2075-2.
  12. Duran ET (2011). Examination with the health belief model of women's attitudes to cervical cancer and early diagnosis in Turkey: A qualitative study. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 12, 1179-4.
  13. Ersin F, Bahar Z (2011). Effect of health belief model and health promotion model on breast cancer early diagnosis behavior: A systematic review. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 12, 2555-2.
  14. Francis SA, Battle-Fisher M, Liverpool J, et al (2011). A qualitative analysis of South African women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about HPV and cervical cancer prevention, vaccine awareness and acceptance, and maternalchild communication about sexual health. Vaccine, 29, 8760-5.
  15. Green LW, Kreuter MW (1991). Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. 2nd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
  16. Kirscht J (1998). The health belief model and predictions of health actions. In D. Gochman (Ed.), Health behavior: emerging research perspectives, (pp. 27-42). New York, USA: Plenum Press.
  17. Krieger N (1999). Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv, 29, 295-2.
  18. Kurkure AP, Yeole BB (2006). Social inequalities in cancer with special reference to South Asian countries. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 7, 36-0.
  19. Kwok C, Sullivan G (2006). Chinese-Australian women's beliefs about cancer: implications for health promotion. Cancer Nursing, 29, 14-1.
  20. Lyttle NL, Stadelman K (2006). Assessing awareness and knowledge of breast and cervical cancer among Appalachian women. Preventing Chronic Disease, 3, 125.
  21. Maree JE, Wright SCD (2010). How would early detection be possible? An enquiry into cancer related knowledge, understanding and health seeking behavior of urban black women in Tshwane, South Africa, Eur J Oncol Nur, 14, 190-6.
  22. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) (2002). Fifty years of cancer control in India. National Cancer Control Programme, DGHS, Government of India. (2002). New Delhi.
  23. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) (2005). National Cancer Control Programme Guidelines, 2005, Government of India, New Delhi.
  24. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India (2008). Annual Report 2007-08, New Delhi.
  25. Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation (MoHUPA) (2011). Strategy paper (in 7 Steps). Government of India. Available at PAPER.pdf. Accessed on 11 Mar 2011.
  26. Moore RJ, Spiegel D (2004). Cancer culture and communication. New York, USA: Kluwer Academic/Plenum publishers.
  27. National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health (NCMH) 2005: Background Papers (2005). Available at Accessed on 02 Jan 2010.
  28. National Institute of Health & Family Welfare (NIHFW) (2002). Report on Evaluation of implementation status of national cancer control programme in India, New Delhi.
  29. Niederdeppe J, Levy AG (2007). Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 16, 998-3.
  30. Pal SK, Mittal B (2004). Fight against cancer in countries with limited resources: the post-genomic era scenario. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 5, 328-3.
  31. Rao RS, Nair S, Nair NS, Kamath VG (2005). Acceptability and effectiveness of a breast health awareness programme for rural women in India. Indian J Med Sci, 59, 398-2.
  32. Ray K, Mandal S (2004). Knowledge about cancer in West Bengal - a pilot survey. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 5, 205-2.
  33. Rosentock IM (1994). The health belief model: origins and correlates. Health Education Monographs, 2, 336-3.
  34. Ruth EC, Evans AE, Simon JW (2010). Public perceptions of the harms and benefits of testicular cancer education: A qualitative study, Cancer Epidemiology, 34, 212-9.
  35. Serin D, Pujol H, Schraub S, Chevalier H (1998). Opinion survey carried out among women treated for gynecologic and breast cancers and their medical care teams. Bull Cancer, 85, 578-8.
  36. Seth T, Kotwal A, Thakur R, Singh P, Kochupillai V (2005). Common cancers in India: knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of urban slum dwellers in New Delhi. Public Health, 119, 87-6.
  37. Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL (2005). Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet, 366, 825-1.
  38. Veronesi U, Von Kleist S, Redmond KG, et al (1999). Caring About Women and Cancer (CAWAC): a European survey of the perspectives and experiences of women with female cancers. Eur J Cancer, 35, 1667-5.
  39. Unger-Saldaña K, Infante-Castañeda CB (2011). Breast cancer delay: A grounded model of help-seeking behavior. Social Sci & Med, 72, 1096-4.
  40. Villafuerte BE, Gomez LL, Betancourt AM, Cervantes ML (2007). Cervical cancer: a qualitative study on subjectivity, family, gender and health services. Reproductive Health, 4, 2.
  41. Wardle J, Waller J, Brunswick N, Jarvis MJ (2001). Awareness of risk factors for cancer among British adults. Public Health, 115, 173-4.
  42. Yusoff N, Mohd Taib NA, Ahmad A (2011). The health seeking trajectories of Malaysian women and their husbands in delay cases of breast cancer: a qualitative study, Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 12, 2563-0.

Cited by

  1. Risk of Breast Cancer in Relation to Reproductive Factors in North-west of Iran, 2013-2014 vol.16, pp.2, 2015,