DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bleomycin, Etoposide and Cisplatinum (BEP) Chemotherapy for Metastatic Germ Cell Tumours: Treatment Outcomes at UKM Medical Centre, Malaysia

  • Azrif, Muhammad (Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, UKM Medical Centre) ;
  • Leong, Yu Kong (Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, UKM Medical Centre) ;
  • Aslan, Nik Muhammad (Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, UKM Medical Centre) ;
  • Fong, Kua Voon (Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, UKM Medical Centre) ;
  • Ismail, Fuad (Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, UKM Medical Centre)
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Introduction: Although bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatinum (BEP) chemotherapy is established as the standard treatment for germ cell tumours, it requires significant experience in administration and toxicity management to maintain optimal dose intensity. A retrospective review of 30 patients was conducted at UKMMC to study treatment outcomes. Methods & Materials: Patients with GCTs and treated with at least two cycles of BEP chemotherapy between January 2003 and Oct 2009 were eligible for this study. Patients received 4-6 cycles of bleomycin 30,000IU IV D1, D8 & D15 and either etoposide $100mg/m^2$ IV D1-D5 and cisplatin $20mg/m^2$ IV D1-D5 (5 day BEP regimen) or etoposide $165mg/m^2$ D1-D3 and cisplatin $50mg/m^2$ D1-3 (3 day BEP regimen) every three weeks per cycle. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) from days 6 to 10 of each cycle. The overall response rates, 2 year progression-free survival and overall survival of the whole cohort were assessed. Results: Thirty patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Non-seminomatous GCTs comprised 93.3% of cases and gonadal and mediastinal primary sites were the most common. Sixty percent were classified as IGCCCG poor risk disease. Median follow-up was 26.6 months. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 70%. The two year PFS and OS were 70% and 66%. There was a significant difference in terms of the overall response rate (85% vs 40%, p = 0.03) and in PFS (94.7% vs 50%, p = 0.003) between gonadal and extragonadal primary sites. Conclusion: It is possible to achieve outcomes similar to those in international clinical trials with close monitoring and good supportive care of patients undergoing BEP chemotherapy. There is a strong argument for patients with IGCCCG poor prognosis disease to be treated in specialist tertiary centres to optimize treatment outcomes.

Keywords

Germ cell tumour;BEP chemotherapy;prognosis;Malaysia

References

  1. Aass N, Klepp O, Cavallin Stahl E, et al (1991). Prognostic factors in unselected patients with non-seminomatous metastatic testicular cancer: a multicentre experience. J Clin Oncol, 9, 818-26.
  2. Bajorin DF, Nichols CR, Margolin KA, et al (2006). Phase 3 trial of conventional dose chemotherapy alone or with high dose chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumour patients: a cooperative group trial by memorial sloan kettering cancer center, ECOG, SWOG and CALGB. J Clin Oncol, 24, 219.
  3. Bokemeyer C, Kohrmann O, Tischer J, et al (1996). A randomized trial of cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) versus carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (CEB) for patients with good risk metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Ann Oncol, 7, 1015-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010493
  4. Collette L, Sylvester R, Stenning S, et al (1999). Impact of the treating institution on survival of patients with "poor prognosis" metastatic non-seminoma. J Natl Cancer Inst, 91, 839-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.10.839
  5. Culine S, Kramar A, Theodore C, et al (2008). Randomized trial comparing bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin with alternating cisplatin/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin and vinblastine/bleomycin regimens of chemotherapy for patients with intermediate and poor risk metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: genito-urinary group of the French federation of cancer centers trial T93MP. J Clin Oncol, 26, 421-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8461
  6. De Wit R, Stoter G, Sleijfer DT, et al (1995). Four cycles of BEP versus an alternating regime of PVB and BEP in patients with poor prognosis metastatic testicular non-seminoma; a randomized study of the EORTC Genitourianry Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. British J Cancer, 71, 1311-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.254
  7. De Wit R, Stoter G, Kaye SB, et al (1997). Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good prognosis testicular non-seminoma: a randomized study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer genitourinary tract cancer cooperative group. J Clin Oncol, 15, 1837-43.
  8. De Wit R, Roberts JT, Wilkinson PM, et al (2001). Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy and of 3- or 5- day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: a randomized study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer trial and medical research council. J Clin Oncol, 19, 1629-40.
  9. Droz JP, Kramar A, Biron P, et al (2007). Failure of high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide combined with doubledose cisplatin and bone marrow support in patients with high volume metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours: mature results of a randomised trial. Eur Urol, 51, 739-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.035
  10. Einhorn LH, Williams SD, Loehrer PJ, et al (1989). Evaluation of optimal duration of chemotherapy in favourable prognosis disseminated germ cell tumours: a southern cancer study group protocol. J Clin Oncol, 7, 387-91.
  11. Gerard L C C, Rampal S, Yahya H (2008). Cancer Incidence in PeninsularMalaysia 2003-2005. National Cancer Registry, the Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
  12. Harding MJ, Paul J, Gillis CR (1993). Management of malignant teratoma: does referral to a specialist unit matter? Lancet, 314, 999-1002.
  13. Horwich A, Sleijfer DT, Fossa D, et al (1997). Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin compared with a bleomycin, etoposide and carboplatin in good prognosis metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell cancer: a multi-institutional medical research Council/European organization for research and treatment of cancer trial. J Clin Oncol, 15, 1844-52.
  14. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (1997). International germ cell consensus classification; a prognostic factor based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. J Clin Oncol, 15, 594-603
  15. Kaye SB, Mead GM, Fossa S, et al (1998). Intensive inductionsequential chemotherapy with BOP/VIP-B compared with treatment with BEP/EP for poor prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumour: a randomized medical research Council/ European organization for research and treatment of cancer study. J Clin Oncol, 16, 692-701
  16. Levi JA, Raghavan D, Harvey V, et al (1993). The importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis germ cell carcinoma. Australasian germ cell trial group. J Clin Oncol, 11, 1300-5
  17. Loehrer Sr P, Johnson D, Elson P, Einhorn LH, Trump D (1995). Importance of bleomycin in favourable-prognosis disseminated germ cell tumours: an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol, 13, 470-6
  18. Nichols CR, Catalano PJ, Crawford ED, et al (1998). Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced disseminated germ cell tumours: an Eastern cooperative oncology group, Southwest oncology group and cancer and leukemia group B study. J Clin Oncol, 16, 1287-93