DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Bacillus subtilis and Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotics Influences Intestinal Mucin Gene Expression, Histomorphology and Growth Performance in Broilers

  • Aliakbarpour, H.R. (Department of Animal Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Chamani, Mohammad (Department of Animal Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Rahimi, G. (Laboratory for Molecular Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Animal Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University) ;
  • Sadeghi, A.A. (Department of Animal Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Qujeq, D. (Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2012.02.28
  • Accepted : 2012.04.26
  • Published : 2012.09.01

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of commercial monostrain and multistrain probiotics in diets on growth performance, intestinal morphology and mucin gene (MUC2) expression in broiler chicks. Three hundred seventy-eight 1-d-old male Arian broiler chicks were allocated in 3 experimental groups for 6 wk. The birds were fed on a corn-soybean based diet and depending on the addition were labeled as follows: control-unsupplemented (C), birds supplemented with Bacillus subtilis (BS) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) based probiotics. Each treatment had 6 replicates of 21 broilers each. Treatment effects on body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and biomarkers such as intestinal goblet cell density, villus length, villus width, and mucin gene expression were determined. Total feed intake did not differ significantly between control birds and those fed a diet with probiotics (p>0.05). However, significant differences in growth performance were found. Final body weight at 42 d of age was higher in birds fed a diet with probiotics compared to those fed a diet without probiotic (p<0.05). Inclusion of Bacillus subtilis based probiotic in the diets also significantly affected feed conversion rate (FCR) compared with control birds (p<0.05). No differences in growth performance were observed in birds fed different types of probiotic supplemented diets. Inclusion of lactic acid bacteria based probiotic in the diets significantly increased goblet cell number and villus length (p<0.05). Furthermore, diets with Bacillus subtilis based probiotics significantly increased gene expression (p<0.05), with higher intestinal MUC2 mRNA in birds fed diet with probiotics compared to those fed the control diet. In BS and LAB probiotic fed chicks, higher growth performance may be related to higher expression of the MUC2 gene in goblet cells and/or morphological change of small intestinal tract. The higher synthesis of the mucin gene after probiotic administration may positively affect bacterial interactions in the intestinal digestive tract, intestinal mucosal cell proliferation and consequently efficient nutrient absorption.

Keywords

Probiotic;Bacillus subtilis;Mucin;Gene Expression;Small Intestine;Broilers

References

  1. Applegate, T. J., V. Klose, T. Steiner, A. Ganner and G. Schatzmayr. 2010. Probiotics and phytogenics for poultry: Myth or reality? J. Appl. Poult. Res. 19:194-210. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00168
  2. Awad, W. A., K. Chareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem and J. Bohm. 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and symbiotic on growth performance, organ weight and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 88:49-56. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
  3. Awad, W. A., J. Bohm, E. Razzazi-Fazeli, K. Ghareeb and J. Zentek. 2006. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 85:974-979. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.6.974
  4. Azzam, M. M. M., X. T. Zou, X. Y. Dong and P. Xie. 2011. Effect of supplemental L-threonine on mucin 2 gene expression and intestine mucosal immune and digestive enzymes activities of laying hens in environments with high temperature and humidity. Poult. Sci. 90:2251-2256. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01574
  5. Bansal, G. R., V. P. Singh and N. Sachan. 2011. Effect of probiotic supplementation on performance of broilers. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 5:277-284. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2011.277.284
  6. Baurhoo, B., P. R. Ferket and X. Zhao. 2009. Effects of diets containing different concentrations of mannanoligosaccharide or antibiotics on growth performance, intestinal development, cecal and litter microbial populations, and carcass parameters of broilers. Poult. Sci. 88:2262-2272. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00562
  7. Burkholder, K. M., K. L. Thompson, M. E. Einstein, T. J. Applegate and J. A. Patterson. 2008. Influence of stressors on normal intestinal microbiota, intestinal morphology and susceptibility to Salmonella enteritidis colonization in broilers. Poult. Sci. 87:1734-1741. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00107
  8. Caballero-Franco, C., K. Keller, C. De Simone and K. Chadee. 2006. The VSL#3 probiotic formula induces mucin gene expression and secretion in colonic epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 292:315-322. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00265.2006
  9. Chen, K. L., W. L. Kho, S. H. You, R. H. Yeh, S. W. Tang and C. W. Hsieh. 2009. Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers. Poult. Sci. 88:309-315. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00224
  10. Chichlowski, M., W. J. Croom, F. W. Edens, B. W. McBride, R. Qiu, C. C. Chiang, L. R. Daniel, G. B. Havenstein and M. D. Koci. 2007. Microarchitecture and spatial relationship between bacteria and ileal, cecal and colonic epithelium in chicks fed a direct-fed microbial, Primalac, and Salinomycin. Poult. Sci. 86:1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1121
  11. Dalloul, R. A., H. S. Lillehoj, T. A. Shellem and J. A. Doerr. 2003. Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Poult. Sci. 82:62-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.1.62
  12. Deplancke, B. and H. R. Gaskins. 2001. Microbial modulation of innate defense: Goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:1131-1141.
  13. Dharmani, P., V. Srivastava, V. Kissoon-Singh and K. Chadee. 2008. Role of Intestinal mucins in Innate host defense mechanisms against pathogens. J. Innate Immun. 8:123-135.
  14. Flint, J. F. and M. R. Garner. 2009. Feeding beneficial bacteria: A natural solution for increasing efficiency and decreasing pathogens in animal agriculture. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 18:367-378. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00133
  15. Forder, R. E. A., G. S. Howarth, D. R. Tivey and R. J. Hughes. 2007. Bacterial modulation of small intestinal goblet cells and mucin composition during early post-hatch development of poultry. Poult. Sci. 86:2396-2403. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00222
  16. Geyra, A., Z. Uni and D. Sklan. 2001. Enterocyte dynamics and mucosal development in the post-hatch chick. Poult. Sci. 80:776-782. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.6.776
  17. Girish. C. K. and T. K. Smith. 2008. Effects of feeding blends of grains naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on small intestinal morphology of turkeys. Poult. Sci. 87:1075-1082. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00379
  18. Horn, N. L., S. S. Donkin, T. J. Applegate and O. Adeola. 2009. Intestinal mucin dynamics: response of broiler chicks and white pekin ducklings to dietary threonine. Poult. Sci. 88:1906-1914. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00009
  19. Iwashita, J., S. Yukita, S. Hiroko, T. Nagatomo, S. Hiroshi and A. Tatsuya. 2003. mRNA of MUC2 is stimulated by IL-4, IL-13 or TNF-$\alpha$ through a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in human colon cancer cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 81:275-282. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1711.2003.t01-1-01163.x
  20. Kabir, S. M. L. 2009. The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10:3531-3546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10083531
  21. Karimi-Torshizi, M. A., S. Rahimi, N. Mojgani, S. Esmaeilkhanian and J. L. Grimes. 2008. Screening of indigenous strains of lactic acid bacteria for development of a probiotic for poultry. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1495-1500. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80081
  22. Leuschner, R. G. K. and J. Bew. 2003. Enumeration of probiotic bacilli spores in animal feed: interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 86:568-575.
  23. Liu, T., R. She, K. Wang, H. Bao, Y. Zhang, D. Luo, Y. Hu, Y. Ding, D. Wang and K. Peng. 2008. Effects of rabbit Sacculusrotundus antimicrobial peptides on the intestinal mucosal immunity in chickens. Poult. Sci. 87:250-254. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00353
  24. Livak, K. J. and T. D. Schmittgen. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real- time quantitative PCR and $2^{-{\Delta}{\Delta}ct}$ method. Methods 25:402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  25. Mack, D. R., S. Michail, S. Wei, L. McDougall and M. A. Hollingsworth. 1999. Probiotics inhibit enteropathogenic E. coli adherence in vitro by inducing intestinal mucin gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. 276:941-950.
  26. Mattar, A. F., H. Daniel, R. A. Teitelbaum, F. Drongowski, C. M. Yongy, Harmon and A. G. Coran. 2002. Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 18:586-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0855-7
  27. Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsitrsikos, I. Palamidi, A. Arvaniti, M. Mohnl. G. Schatzmayr and K. Fegeros. 2010. Effect of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poult. Sci. 89:58-67. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00308
  28. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 8th ed. Natl. Acad. Press. Washington, DC, USA.
  29. O'Dea, E. E., G. M. Fasenko, G. E. Allison, D. R. Korver, G. W. Tannock and L. L. Guan. 2006. Investigating the effects of commercial probiotics on broiler chick quality and production efficiency. Poult. Sci. 85:1855-1863. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.10.1855
  30. Ohh, S. J. 2011. Meta-analysis to draw the appropriate regimen of enzyme and probiotic supplementation to pigs and chicken diets. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24:573-586. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.r.06
  31. Onderci, M., N. Sahin, G. Cikim, A. ydyn and I. Ozercan. 2008. $\alpha$-glucanase-producing bacterial culture improves performance and nutrient utilization and alters gut morphology of broilers fed a barley-based diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.005
  32. Rahimi, S., J. L. Grimes, O. Fletcher, E. Oviedo and B. W. Sheldon. 2010. Effect of a direct-fed microbial (Primalac) on structure and ultrastructure of small intestine in turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 88:491-503.
  33. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS user's guide. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  34. Smirnov, A., D. Sklan and Z. Uni. 2004. Mucin dynamics in the chick small intestine are altered by starvation. J. Nutr. 134:736-742.
  35. Smirnov, A., R. Perez, E. Amit-Romach, D. Sklan and Z. Uni. 2005. Mucin dynamics and microbial population in chicken small intestine are changed by dietary probiotic and antibiotic growth promoter supplementation. J. Nutr. 135:187-192.
  36. Tanabe, H., K. Sugiyama, T. Matsuda, S. Kiriyama and T. Morita. 2005. Small intestinal mucins are secreted in proportion to the settling volume in water of dietary indigestible components in rats. J. Nutr. 135:2431-2437.
  37. Tellez, G., S. E. Higgins, A. M. Donoghue and B. M. Hargis. 2006. Digestive physiology and the role of microorganisms. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:136-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.1.136
  38. Thompson, K. L. and T. J. Applegate. 2006. Feed withdrawal alters small intestinal morphology and mucus of broilers. Poult. Sci. 85:1535-1540. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.9.1535
  39. Timmerman, H. M., A. Veldman, E. van den Elsen, F. M. Rombouts and A. C. Beynen. 2006. Mortality and growth performance of broilers given drinking water supplemented with chicken-specific probiotics. Poult. Sci. 85:1383-1388. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.8.1383
  40. Uni, Z., A. Smirnov and D. Sklan. 2003. Pre- and post-hatch development of goblet cells in the broiler small intestine: effect of delayed access to feed. Poult. Sci. 82:320-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.2.320
  41. Vila, B., A. Fontgibell, I. Badiola, E. Esteve-Garcia, G. Jiménez, M. Castillo and J. Brufau. 2009. Reduction of Salmonella entericavar. Enteritidis colonization and invasion by Bacillus cereus var. toyoi inclusion in poultry feeds. Poult. Sci. 88:975-979. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00483
  42. Willis, W. L. and L. Reid. 2008. Investigating the effects of dietary probiotic feeding regimens on broiler chicken production and Campylobacter jejuni presence. Poult. Sci. 87:606-611. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2006-00458
  43. Zhou, X., Y. Wang, Q. Gu and W. Li. 2010. Effect of dietary probiotic, Bacillus coagulans, on growth performance, chemical composition, and meat quality of Guangxi Yellow chicken. Poult. Sci. 89:588-593. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00319

Cited by

  1. Effect of Dietary Live or Killed Kimchi Lactic Acid Bacteria on Growth Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Gut Microbiota and Meat Characteristics in Broiler Chicken vol.40, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.1.057
  2. Effects of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> KN-42 on Growth Performance, Diarrhea and Faecal Bacterial Flora of Weaned Piglets vol.27, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13737
  3. Effects of Bacillus subtilis, Kefir and β-Glucan Supplementation on Growth Performance, Blood Characteristics, Meat Quality and Intestine Microbiota in Broilers vol.43, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.3.159
  4. Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers vol.88, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150071
  5. and its application to goose feed vol.4, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171012
  6. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LFB112 in the diet on growth of broilers and on the quality and fatty acid composition of broiler meat vol.57, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16119
  7. and the intestinal microbiota vol.58, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1307322
  8. The Effects of Direct-fed Microbial Supplementation, as an Alternative to Antibiotics, on Growth Performance, Intestinal Immune Status, and Epithelial Barrier Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens vol.9, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9275-9
  9. At-hatch administration of probiotic to chickens can introduce beneficial changes in gut microbiota vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194825
  10. Effects of dietary Bacillus amyloliquefaciens supplementation on growth performance, intestinal morphology, inflammatory response, and microbiota of intra-uterine growth retarded weanling piglets vol.9, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0236-2
  11. Short-term toxicity of dibutyl phthalate to mice intestinal tissue pp.1477-0393, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233718807303
  12. Probiotics and plant-derived compounds as eco-friendly agents to inhibit microbial toxins in poultry feed: a comprehensive review pp.1614-7499, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3197-2
  13. -induced necrotic enteritis and growth performance in broilers vol.102, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12937
  14. as direct-fed microbial antibiotic alternatives to enhance growth, immunity, and gut health in poultry vol.47, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2018.1464117
  15. Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Zinc and Multi-Microbe Probiotic on Growth Traits and Alteration of Intestinal Architecture in Broiler pp.1867-1314, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9424-9
  16. The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition vol.25, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x