DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on the Social Diffusion of Geo-technologies Outcome : Comparison of Recognition between Experts and Nonexperts

지질자원기술 연구성과의 사회적 확산 분석 : 전문가와 비전문가의 인식 비교

  • Received : 2011.09.17
  • Accepted : 2012.05.23
  • Published : 2012.06.28

Abstract

This study investigates the differences of recognition about geo-technologies outcome between experts and nonexperts. Based on these findings, this study would offer suggestions for future communication strategies on research outcome in a various field of scientific research as well as KIGAM. The result shows that there are differences between expert and nonexpert in the level of recognition about geoscience research outcome. The findings of this study emphasize the needs for recognizing the concept that geo-technologies are directly related to people's lives and external communication is necessary.

본 연구는 지질자원기술의 연구성과에 대한 인식을 전문가와 비전문가로 구분해 살펴보았다. 이러한 조사를 바탕으로 한국지질자원연구원의 연구성과 뿐만 아니라 국가 발전에 이바지하는 다양한 과학 연구 분야의 연구성과에 관한 향후 커뮤니케이션 전략에 관한 제언을 제공하고자 했다. 전체적으로, 지질자원기술의 연구성과에 있어 인식 수준의 차이가 전문가 집단과 비전문가 집단 사이에 나타나고 있음을 발견했다. 지질자원기술은 국민 생활에 직결되는 문제임을 인식시키고 적극적인 대외 커뮤니케이션이 필요하다고 할 수 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국지질자원연구원

References

  1. Choi, Y.H. (1990). A study on the accuracy of science reporting on newspaper in Korea. Seoul: The Ministry of Science-Technology.
  2. Chung, D.C. (1996). A study on the accuracy of science reporting. Seoul: The Korean Press Institute.
  3. Hong, H.Y. and Kim, H.S. (2004). A study on reporting process of science information. Proceedings of the 2004 Fall Conference of the Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies, 51-53.
  4. Kim, C.S., Kim, S.Y. and Lee, J.R. (2007). A study on public relations strategy and program on geo-technology R&D outcome. Econ. Environ. Geol., v.40, n.6, p.797- 804.
  5. Kim, C.S. and Kim, S.Y. (2008). A study on communication programs of geo-technology R&D outcome using the SMTCR model. Econ. Environ. Geol., v.41, n.2, p.267-273.
  6. Kim, C.S. (2009). Environmental change and methodology of public relations. Korean Journal of Social Science, v.31, n.1, p.82-86
  7. Kim, H.S. (1987). Considerations and policies for science communication media. Seoul : Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
  8. Kim, H.S. (1995). Science journalism. The East-West Channel, 6, p.68-81.
  9. Kim, H.S. (1999). The processes of public science and science communication : A new conceptual explication. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, v.43, n.4, p.79-109.
  10. Lee, H.S. (1989). A study on the science coverage of newspaper in Korea. Science Communication Symposium of The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies, p.23-56.
  11. Lee, J.R. (2004). Study on the PR campaign strategies and practical programmes of science and technology for Korean government. Collection of Theses, 15, p.149-178.
  12. Lee, K.Y. (1996). A study on the current status and problems of science communication. The East-West Channel, 6, p.82-101.
  13. Lee, M.W. (1989). A study on audience about the science communication: The realities of acceptance and characteristic of Science technology information. Science Communication Symposium of The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies, p.57-99.
  14. Oh, C.S. (2002). A study on promoting the popularization of science & technology by mass media. Seoul: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning.
  15. Park, S.C. (2006). On-line public relations of the research institutes in science & technology sector. Science and Technology Policy, v.15, n.5, p.76-82.
  16. Song, H.R., Kim, W.J. and Cho, H.M. (2005). A study on audience's awareness about the media reports of science technology risk : focused on the genetically modified organism(GMO) case. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, v.49, n.3, p.105-128.
  17. The Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (2005). A survey on the usage of internet in 2004. Seoul: The Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.