Tobacco Control Law Enforcement and Compliance in Odisha, India - Implications for Tobacco Control Policy and Practice

  • Published : 2012.09.30


Introduction: Tobacco use is a leading cause of deaths and disabilities in India, killing about 1.2 lakh people in 2010. About 29% of adults use tobacco on a daily basis and an additional 5% use it occasionally. In Odisha, non-smoking forms are more prevalent than smoking forms. The habit has very high opportunity cost as it reduces the capacity to seek better nutrition, medical care and education. In line with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) is a powerful Indian national law on tobacco control. The Government of Odisha has shown its commitment towards enforcement and compliance of COTPA provisions. In order to gauge the perceptions and practices related to tobacco control efforts and level of enforcement of COTPA in the State, this cross-sectional study was carried out in seven selected districts. Materials and methods: A semi-structured interview schedule was developed, translated into Odiya and field-tested for data collection. It mainly contained questions related to knowledge on provisions of section 4-7 of COTPA 2003, perception about smoking, chewing tobacco and practices with respect to compliance of selected provisions of the Act. 1414 samples were interviewed. Results: The highest percentage of respondents was from the government departments. 73% of the illiterates consumed tobacco as compared to 34% post graduates. 52.1% of the respondents were aware of Indian tobacco control laws, while 80.8% had knowledge about the provision of the law prohibiting smoking in public places. However, 36.6% of the respondents reported that they had 'very often' seen tobacco products being sold 'to a minor', while 31.2% had seen tobacco products being sold 'by a minor'. In addition, 24.8% had 'very often' seen tobacco products being sold within a radius of 100 yards of educational institutions.


  1. Aravind K, Raghavendra B, Hemagiri K, Goud TG (2011). Awareness about Pictorial Warnings on Tobacco Products and its Impact on Tobacco Consumers in Bellary, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2485-9.
  2. Aruna DS, Rajesh G, Mohanty VR (2010). Insights into pictorial health warnings on tobacco product packages marketed in Uttar Pradesh, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 539-43.
  3. Centre for Global Health Research (2011). Tobacco-related and cervical cancers are important causes of death among working-age people in India. Accessed on 20th May 2012.
  4. Chaly PE (2007). Tobacco control in India. Indian J of Dent Res, 18, 2-5.
  5. Chaturvedi P (2007). India needs stricter implementation. Indian J Cancer, 44, 129-30.
  6. CM Singh, Amit Kaushik, KP Jain (2011). Indian Journal of Community Health 23(2); July 2011-Dec 2011; Editorial.
  7. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). India Survey 2010;;accessed on 10th April, 2012.
  8. Government of India (2003). The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, and rules framed there under.
  9. John RM, TWO AUTHORS et al (2004). Economic cost of tobacco use in India. Tob Control, 18, 138-43.
  10. National Tobacco Control Program, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. http://mohfw.nic. in/index1.php?lang=1&level=2&sublinkid=671&lid=662; accessed on July 1, 2012.
  11. Nayak NS, Annigeri VB, Revankar DR, Kenchaigol S (2003). Secondhand smoke in public places: can Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation be a role model for effective implementation of cigarette and other tobacco products act? Indian J of Cancer, 479, 24-9.
  12. Pednekar MS, Gupta PC (2004). Tobacco use among school students in Goa, India. Indian J Public Hlth, 48, 147-52
  13. Selvavinayagam TS. Overview on implementation of smoke free education institutions in tamilnadu, India. Indian Journal of Cancer 2010; 479(1): S39-S42
  14. Sinha DN, Gupta PC (2004). Tobacco use among school personnel in Orissa. Indian J Public Hlth, 48, 123-7.
  15. Sharma I, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR (2010). Awareness, attitude and perceived barriers regarding implementation of the cigarettes and other tobacco products Act in Assam, India. Indian J Cancer, 479, 63-8.
  16. Singh CM, Kaushik A, Jain KP (2011). Indian J Community Hlth, 23.
  17. Sinha DN, Gupta PC (2004). Tobacco use among school personnel in Orissa. Indian J Public Hlth, 48, 123-7.
  18. Tarveen J, Ravi M (2008). Tobacco Control in India: Present Scenario and Challenges Ahead. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 9, 805-10.
  19. World Health Organization (2003). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Geneva.
  20. World Health Organization (2011). Regional Office for South East Asia. Profile on implementation WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in the South-East Asia Region, New Delhi, India.

Cited by

  1. Implementation of Smoke-free Legislation in Malaysia: Are Adolescents Protected from Respiratory Health Effects? vol.15, pp.12, 2014,
  2. Analysis of Motivating Factors for Smokeless Tobacco Use in Two Indian States vol.15, pp.16, 2014,
  3. The Enforcement of India's Tobacco Control Legislation in the State of Haryana: A Case Study vol.6, pp.4, 2014,
  4. Compliance With Point-of-Sale Tobacco Control Policies in School-Adjacent Neighborhoods in Mumbai, India vol.30, pp.6, 2016,
  5. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Implementation in Nigeria: Lessons for Low- and Middle-Income Countries pp.1469-994X, 2018,