Comparison of Teaching about Breast Cancer via Mobile or Traditional Learning Methods in Gynecology Residents

  • Published : 2012.09.30


Introduction: Mobile learning enables users to interact with educational resources while in variable locations. Medical students in residency positions need to assimilate considerable knowledge besides their practical training and we therefore aimed to evaluate the impact of using short message service via cell phone as a learning tool in residents of Obstetrics and Gynecology in our hospital. Methods: We sent short messages including data about breast cancer to the cell phones of 25 residents of gynecology and obstetrics and asked them to study a well-designed booklet containing another set of information about the disease in the same period. The rate of learning derived from the two methods was compared by pre- and post-tests and self-satisfaction assessed by a relevant questionnaire at the end of the program. Results: The mobile learning method had a significantly better effect on learning and created more interest in the subject. Conclusion: Learning via receiving SMS can be an effective and appealing method of knowledge acquisition in higher levels of education.


  1. Davies BS, Rafique J, Vincent TR, et al (2012). Mobile medical education (momed)-how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Education, 12, 1.
  2. Islam YM, Ashraf M, Rahman Z, Rahman M (2005). Mobile telephone technology as a distance learning tool. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Miami, USA: 226-232. ISBN 972-8865-19-8.
  3. Jeng YL, Wu TT, Huang YM, Tan Q, Yang SJH (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: a review study. Education Technol Society, 13, 3-11.
  4. Lu M (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. J of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 515-25.
  5. Mellow P (2005). The media generation: Maximise learning by getting mobile.
  6. Motlik S (2008). Mobile learning in developing nations. Int Rev of Res in Open and Distance Learning, 9, ?-?.
  7. Saran M, Seferoğlu G, Çağıltay K (2012). Mobile language learning: contribution of multimedia messages via mobile phones in consolidating vocabulary. Asia-Pac Educ Res, 21, 181-90.
  8. Woods D, Attwell A, Ross K, Theron G (2012). Text messages as a learning tool for midwives. South African Medical J, 102, 100-1.

Cited by

  1. Teaching reproductive endocrinology in Iran: Pilot assessment of hospital-based clinical modules for medical students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences vol.05, pp.02, 2013,
  2. Teaching Breast Cancer Screening via Text Messages as Part of Continuing Education for Working Nurses: A Case-control Study vol.15, pp.14, 2014,
  3. Knowledge of Breast Cancer and Breast Self-Examination Practice among Iranian Women in Hamedan, Iran vol.15, pp.16, 2014,
  4. Breast Cancer Prevention Information Seeking Behavior and Interest on Cell Phone and Text Use: a Cross-sectional Study in Malaysia vol.16, pp.4, 2015,
  5. mHealth Education Applications Along the Cancer Continuum vol.30, pp.2, 2015,
  6. The mCME Project: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an SMS-Based Continuing Medical Education Intervention for Improving Medical Knowledge among Vietnamese Community Based Physicians’ Assistants vol.11, pp.11, 2016,
  7. Factors influencing the implementation, adoption, use, sustainability and scalability of mLearning for medical and nursing education: a systematic review protocol vol.5, pp.1, 2016,
  8. Texting preferences in a Paediatric residency vol.14, pp.6, 2017,
  9. Awareness and current knowledge of breast cancer vol.50, pp.1, 2017,
  10. Text messaging versus email for emergency medicine residents’ knowledge retention: a pilot comparison in the United States vol.13, pp.1975-5937, 2016,
  11. : a randomised text-messaging trial pp.17434971, 2018,