Understanding Breast Cancer Screening Practices in Taiwan: a Country with Universal Health Care

  • Wu, Tsu-Yin (Healthy Asians Americans Project, Eastern Michigan, University of Michigan) ;
  • Chung, Scott (College of Literature, Science and Arts, University of Michigan) ;
  • Yeh, Ming-Chen (School of Nursing, Huan Kuang University) ;
  • Chang, Shu-Chen (Department of Nursing, Chung-Hua Christian University) ;
  • Hsieh, Hsing-Fang (School of Public Health, University of Michigan) ;
  • Ha, Soo Ji (College of Literature, Science and Arts, University of Michigan)
  • Published : 2012.09.30


While the incidence of breast cancer (BC) has been relatively low in Asian countries, it has been rising rapidly in Taiwan. Within the last decade, it has replaced cervical cancer as the most diagnosed cancer site for women. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of studies reporting the attitudes and practices of breast cancer screening among Chinese women. The aim of this study is to assess Taiwanese women's knowledge of and attitudes toward BC screening and to identify potential factors that may influence screening behavior. The study population consisted of a sample of 434 Taiwanese women aged 40 and older. Despite access to universal health care for Taiwanese women and the fact that a majority of the women had heard of the breast cancer screening (mammogram, clinical breast exams, etc.), the actual utilization of these screening modalities was relatively low. In the current study, the majority of women had never had mammograms or ultrasound in the past 5 years. The number one most reported barriers were "no time," "forgetfulness," "too cumbersome," and "laziness," followed by the perception of no need to get screened. In addition, the results revealed several areas of misconceptions or incorrect information perceived by study participants. Based on the results from the regression analysis, significant predictors of obtaining repeated screening modalities included age, coverage for screening, barriers, self-efficacy, intention, family/friends diagnosed with breast cancer. The findings from the current study provide the potential to build evidence-based programs to effectively plan and implement policies in order to raise awareness in breast cancer and promote BC screening in order to optimize health outcomes for women affected by this disease.


  1. Chang LY, Yang YL, Shyu MK, et al (2012). Strategy for breast cancer screening in taiwan: obstetrician-gynecologists should actively participate in breast cancer screening. J Med Ultrasound, 20, 1-7.
  2. Chen CJ, You SL, Lin LH, et al (2001). Caner epidemiology and control in Taiwan: a brief review. Jpn J Clin Oncolo, 32, 66-81.
  3. Chong PN, KrislmanM, Hong CY, et al (2002). Knowledge and practice of breast cancer screening amongst public health nurses in Singapore. Singapore Med J, 44, 509-16.
  4. Department of Health (2011). Periodic new release for October, 2011.
  5. Kwong A, Cheung PS, Wong Ay, et al (2008). The acceptance and feasibility of breast cancer screening in the East. Breast, 17, 42-50.
  6. Lai MS, Yen MF, Kuo HS, et al (1999). Efficacy of breast-cancer screening for female relatives of breast-cancer-index cases: Taiwan multicentre cancer screening (TAMCAS). Int J Cancer, 25, 21-6.
  7. Lee-Lin F, Menon U, Pett M, et al (2007). Breast cancer beliefs and mammography screening practices among Chinese- American immigrants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 36, 212-21.
  8. Lin SJ (2008). Factors influencing the uptake of screening services for breast and cervical cancer in Taiwan. J R Sac Promot Health, 128, 327-34.
  9. Lu ZJ (2001). Effectiveness of breast self-examination nursing interventions for Taiwanese community target groups. J Adv Nurs, 34, 163-70.
  10. National Institute of Health: Bureau of Health Promotion (2008). Taiwan Cancer Registry: Annual Report for 2008.
  11. Ozmen V, Nilufer OzaydinA, Cabioglu N, et al (2011). Survey on a mammographic screening program in Istanbul, Turkey. Breast J, 17, 260-7.
  12. Parsa P, Mirnalini K (2010). Predictors of adherence to clinical breast examination and mammography screening among Malaysian women. Asian Pac J Prev, 11, 681-8.
  13. Shen YC, Chang Cl, Hsu C (2005). Significant difference in the trends of female breast cancer incidence between Taiwanese and Caucasian Americans: Implications from age-period-cohort analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev, 14, 1986-90.
  14. Straughan PT, Seow A (2000). Attitudes as barriers in breast screening: a perspective study among Singapore women. Soc Sci Med, 51, 1695-703.
  15. World Health Organization [WHO] (2012). Breast cancer: prevention and control. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  16. Wu TY, Brady W (2007). Mammography Stage of Adoption and Decision Balance among Asian Indian and Filipino American Women. Cancer Nurs, 30, 390-8.
  17. Wu TY, Ronis D (2009). Correlates of Recent and Regular Mammography Screening among Asian American Women. J Adv Nurs, 65, 2434-46.
  18. Wu TY, Yu MY (2003). Reliability and validity of mammography screening beliefs questionnaire in Chinese American women. Cancer Nurs, 26, 131-42.
  19. Yu MY, Wu TY (2005). Factors influencing mammography screening of Chinese American women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 34, 386-94.

Cited by

  1. The Results of a Breast Cancer Screening Camp at a District Level in Rural India vol.13, pp.12, 2012,
  2. A community-based intervention in middle schools to improve HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Japan vol.13, pp.1, 2014,
  3. Screening for Breast Cancer in a Low Middle Income Country: Predictors in a Rural Area of Kerala, India vol.15, pp.5, 2014,
  4. Diabetes and breast cancer in Taiwanese women: a detection bias? vol.44, pp.10, 2014,
  5. Breast Cancer Awareness at the Community Level among Women in Delhi, India vol.16, pp.13, 2015,
  6. The Spectrum of Genetic Mutations in Breast Cancer vol.16, pp.6, 2015,
  7. Differences in Incidence, Mortality and Survival of Breast Cancer by Regions and Countries in Asia and Contributing Factors vol.16, pp.7, 2015,
  8. Development of a Breast Cancer Awareness Scale for Thai Women: Moving towards a Validated Measure vol.17, pp.2, 2016,