DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relation Analysis Among Academic Research Areas Using Subject Terms of Domestic Journal Papers

국내 학술지 논문의 주제어를 통한 학술연구분야 관계분석

  • 이혜영 (한국과학기술원 학술정보운영팀) ;
  • 곽승진 (충남대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2011.08.31
  • Accepted : 2011.09.07
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the interrelation among research areas based on domestic journal papers, achievements of korea researchers. Generally, the content of papers is appeared through abstracts, subjects, full-text and so on. This paper is focused on subject terms of Domestic journal papers. The experimental data are 80 domestic journals, 7,616 papers and 58,143 subject terms and papers published in 2009. As the result, it was different to use subject terms on each research area: Engineering, Agriculture & Oceanography, Interdisciplinary Science, Social Science, Arts & Physical Education, Medicine & Pharmacology, Humanities and Natural Science. Subject terms of Engineering have used the most in the other research areas in aspect of term co-occurrence. The 8 research areas were grouped in 3 clusters: C1(Engineering, Natural Science, Social Science, Interdisciplinary Science, Humanities), C2(Medicine & Pharmacology, Arts & Physical Education), and C3(Agriculture & Oceanography).

Keywords

Data Analysis;Domestic Journal Paper;Subject Term;Clustering;Relation Analysis

References

  1. 강종석, 정현상, 이일형. 2010. 과학기술논문을 통한 에너지 연구 분야의 다학제 동태 추적 분석. 기술혁신학회지, 13(4): 617-816.
  2. 곽병만. 1995. 21세기 국제학술활동의 방향. 대한기계학회지, 35(11): 986-989.
  3. 양찬진. 2010. 학술 논문의 주제어 표기 및 활용 방안 연구 - DB 구축 및 정보 연계의 관점에서. 인문콘텐츠, 395-416.
  4. 윤병운, 이창용, 이학연, 손경원, and 김소정. 2008. 계량정보 분석방법론의 과학기술적용 사례조사 분석 연구. 한국과학기술정보연구원: 동국대학교.
  5. 이용덕. 2006. 일본학관련 전문학술지에 나타난 주제어 분석 - 日本學報를 중심으로. 일본어문학, 31: 107-121.
  6. 이춘실, 문혜원. 2000. 한국의학 학술논문의 저자선정 주제어와 MeSH 용어의 비교 분석 연구. 한국정보관리학회 제7회 학술대회 논문집.
  7. 이혜영, 곽승진. 2008. 과학기술분야 학위논문 내용목차에 따른 주제어 출현빈도에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 25(1): 191-210.
  8. 조인숙, 한미숙. 2007. 문헌정보학분야 연구자들의 학회지 게재논문과 인용학술지 분석 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2):89-105.
  9. 최달현, 이창수. 2010. 정보자료의분류와주제명. 개정판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
  10. 최선희, 김희정, 이재윤. 2011. 계량서지적 분석용 공개 소프트웨어 활용 방안. KISTI 지식리포트, 15호.
  11. 최영출, 박수정. 2011. 한국행정학의 연구경향분석: 네트워크 텍스트 분석방법의 적용. 한국행정학보, 45(1): 123-138.
  12. 한국연구재단. 2011. 재단등재(후보) 학술지의 2008년 KCI. [cited 2011.6.7]. .
  13. Andreas Bjurstrom and Merritt Polk. 2011. "Climate Change and Interdisciplinarity: A Co-citation Analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report." Scientometrics, 87(3): 525-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0356-3
  14. Attila V. Varga. 2011. "Measuring the Semantic Integrity of Scientific Fields: A Method and a Study of Sociology, Economics and Biophysics." Scientometrics, Published online: 29 January 2011.
  15. Bjorn Hammarfelt. 2011. "Interdisciplinarity and the Intellectual Base of Literature Studies: Citation Analysis of Highly Cited Monographs." Scientometrics, 86(3): 705-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0314-5
  16. Brooks, T. A. 1985. "Private Acts and Public Objects: An Investigation of Citer Motivations." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4): 223- 229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402
  17. Cathelijn, J. F. Waaijer, Cornelis A. van Bochove, and Nees Jan van Eck. 2011. "On the Map: Nature and Science Editorials." Scientometrics, 86(1): 99- 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0205-9
  18. Daniel Franksa, Patricia Dalea, Richard Hindmarsha, Christine Fellowsa, Margaret Buckridgea, and Patti Cybinski. 2007. "Interdisciplinary Foundations: Reflecting on Interdisciplinarity and three Decades of Teaching and Research at Griffith University, Australia." Studiesin Higher Education, 32(2): 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701267228
  19. Gil-Leiva, I. and A. Alonso-Arroyo. 2007. "Keywords Given by Authors of Scientific Articles in Database Descriptors." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8): 1175-1187. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20595
  20. Henry Small. 2011. "Interpreting Maps of Science Using Citation Context Sentiments: A Preliminary Investigation." Scientometrics, 87(2): 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0349-2
  21. Hu, Chang-Ping, Ji-Ming Hu, Yan Gao, and Yao-Kun Zhang. 2011. "A Journal Cocitation Analysis of Library and Information Science in China." Scientometrics, 86(3): 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0313-6
  22. Latucca, L. R. 2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty. Nashville:Vanderbilt UniversityPress.
  23. Mansilla, V. B. 2006. "Assessing Expert Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Exploration." Research Evaluation, 15:17-29. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776075
  24. Marina A. Pluzhenskaia. 2007. Publication and Citation Analysis of Disciplinary Connections of Library and Information Science Faculty in Accredited. Ph. D. diss. in Library and information science, The Graduate College of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  25. Marshakova-Shaikevich and Irina. 2005. "Bibliometric Maps of Field of Science." Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1534-1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.027
  26. Mingyang Wang, Guang Yu, and Daren Yu. 2011. "Mining Typical Features for Highly Cited Papers." Scientometrics, 87(3): 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0366-1
  27. Mu-hsuan Huang and Yu-wei Chang. 2008. "Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: From a Research Evaluation Perspective." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 559(11): 1819-1828.
  28. Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Rommert Dekker, and Jan van den Berg. 2010. "A Comparison of Two Techniques for Bibliometric Mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2406-2416.
  29. Nicola De Bellis. 2009. Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
  30. Peng Hui Lv, Gui-Fang Wang, Yong Wan, Jia Liu, Qing Liu, and Fei-cheng Ma. 2011. "Bibliometric Trend Analysis on Global Graphene Research." Scientometrics, 88(2): 399- 419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0386-x