DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nutritional Evaluation of Canola Protein Concentrate for Broiler Chickens

  • Thacker, P.A. (Department of Animal Science, University of Saskatchewan) ;
  • Petri, D. (Department of Animal Science, University of Saskatchewan)
  • Received : 2011.05.31
  • Accepted : 2011.07.12
  • Published : 2011.11.01

Abstract

This trial was conducted to determine the effects of including canola protein concentrate in diets fed to broiler chickens on nutrient digestibility and broiler performance (0-21 days). A total of 180, day-old, male broiler chicks weighing an average of 52.8${\pm}$0.6 g were assigned to one of six dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. The control diet was based on corn and soybean meal and contained 15% canola meal. The experimental diets contained 3, 6, 9, 12 or 15% canola protein concentrate added at the expense of canola meal. There were five birds per pen and six replicate pens per treatment. Feed and water were available ad libitum throughout the 21-day experiment. Chromic oxide (0.35%) was added to all diets as a digestibility marker and was fed throughout the experimental period. The digestibility of dry matter, energy and phosphorus increased linearly (p<0.01) with increasing levels of canola protein concentrate. Although nutrient digestibility was higher for birds fed diets containing canola protein concentrate, these improvements did not translate into improvements in broiler performance. Weight gain was unaffected (p = 0.24) by level of canola protein concentrate. Feed intake was significantly increased (p<0.01) with the result that feed conversion tended to be poorer (p = 0.07) for birds fed diets containing canola protein concentrate. Mortality was also unaffected (p = 0.56) by dietary treatment.

Keywords

Broilers;Poultry;Canola Protein Concentrate;Performance;Digestibility

References

  1. Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2007. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edn, AOAC, Washington, DC.
  2. Bell, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:679-697.
  3. Blair, R., R. Misir, J. M. Bell and D. R. Clandinin. 1986. The chemical composition and nutritional value for chickens of meal from recent cultivars of canola. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:821-825. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-090
  4. Borgeson, T. L., V. J. Racz, D. C. Wilkie, L. J. White and M. D. Drew. 2006. Effect of replacing fishmeal and oil with simple or complex mixtures of vegetable ingredients in diets fed to Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquacult. Nutr. 12:141-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2006.00394.x
  5. Britzman, D. G. 2006. Soybean meal. An excellent protein source for poultry feeds. American Soybean Association Technical Bulletin. http://edu.docin.com/product-6754393.html
  6. Burkett, D. P., A. R. Walker and N. S. Painter. 1972. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and transit times and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 2:1408-1412.
  7. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON.
  8. Can Pro Ingredients Limited, 2010. Canola Protein Concentrate. Fact sheet available at http://www.canproingredients.ca/products/canola_protein_concentrate.php. Last accessed Nov 8, 2010.
  9. Carre, B. 2004. Causes for variation in digestibility of starch among feedstuffs. World's Poult. Sci. J. 60:76-88. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20036
  10. Clark, W. D., H. L. Classen and R. W. Newkirk. 2001. Assessment of tail-end dehulled canola meal for use in broiler diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 81:379-386. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-067
  11. Classen, H. L., R. W. Newkirk and D. D. Manez. 2004. Effects of conventional and novel processing on the feed value of canola meal for poultry. Feedinfo News Service, Scientific Reviews. 12/02/2004.
  12. Dale, N. and A. Batal. 2007. Ingredient analysis table: 2007 Edition. Feedstuffs Reference Issue and Buying Guide, Feedstuffs 78:16-23.
  13. Drew, M. D., A. E. Ogunkoya, D. M. Janz and A. G. Van Kessel. 2007. Dietary influence of replacing fish meal and oil with canola protein concentrate and vegetable oils on growth performance, fatty acid composition and organochlorine residues in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 267:260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.01.002
  14. Fenton, T. W. and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  15. Janssen, W. M. M. A. and B. Carre. 1985. Influence of fibre on digestibility of poultry feeds. Pages 71-88 in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (Ed. W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole). Butterworths, London, UK.
  16. Jorgensen, H., X. Zhao, K. E. B. Knudsen and B. O. Eggum. 1996. The influence of dietary fibre source and level on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility and energy metabolism in broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr. 75:379-395. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960141
  17. Maenz, D. D. 2002. Fractionization of oil-extruded canola into high-valued products. Feedinfo News Service: Scientific Reviews 20/10/2002
  18. Maenz, D. D., R. W. Newkirk, H. L. Classen and R. T. Tyler. 2004. Fractionation and processing of oilseed meal. US Patent # 6800308. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
  19. McCurdy, S. M. and B. E. March. 1992. Processing of canola meal for incorporation in trout and salmon diets. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 69:213-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635889
  20. National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p. 155.
  21. Newkirk, R. W. and H. L. Classen. 1998. In vitro hydrolysis of phytate in canola meal with purified and crude sources of phytase. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00190-9
  22. Newkirk, R. W. and H. L. Classen. 2002. The effects of toasting canola meal on body weight, feed conversion efficiency and mortality in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 81:815-825. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.815
  23. Newkirk, R. 2009. Canola meal feed industry Guide 4th Edition, Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba 47 pp.
  24. Novus. 1994. Raw material compendium: A Compilation of Worldwide Data Sources. 2nd Edition. Novus International Inc., Brussels, Belgium, p. 541.
  25. Pettersson, D. and A. Razdan. 1993. Effects of increasing levels of sugar-beet pulp in broiler chicken diets on nutrient digestion and serum lipids. Br. J. Nutr. 70:127-137. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19930110
  26. Schneider, B. H. and W. P. Flatt. 1975. The evaluation of feeds through digestibility experiments. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia p. 423.
  27. Sebastian, S., S. P. Touchburn and E. R. Chavez. 1998. Implications of phytic acid and supplemental microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. A review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 54:26-47.
  28. Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  29. Thacker, P. A. 1998. Effect of micronization of full-fat canola seed on performance and carcass characteristics of growingfinishing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 71:89-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00133-8
  30. Thacker, P. A. and R. W. Newkirk. 2004. Performance of growingfinishing pigs fed barley-based diets containing toasted or nontoasted canola meal. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85:53-59.
  31. Thacker, P. A. and P. Petri. 2009. Nutrient digestibility and performance of broiler chickens fed regular or green biodiesel press cakes produced using a micro-scale production process. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89:1307-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3587
  32. Thiessen, D. L., D. D. Maenz, R. W. Newkirk, H. L. Classen and M. D. Drew. 2004. Replacement of fishmeal by canola protein concentrate in diets fed to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquacult. Nutr. 10:379-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2004.00313.x
  33. Tran, G. and D. Sauvant. 2004. Chemical data and nutritional value. Pages 17-24. In Tables of Composition and Nutritional Value of Feed Materials: Pigs, Poultry, Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Rabbits, Horses, Fish (Ed. D. Sauvant, J. M. Perez and G. Tran). Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Association Francaise de Zootechnie, Paris, France.
  34. Tzeng, Y. M., L. L. Diosady and L. J. Rubin. 1990. Production of canola protein materials by alkaline extraction, precipitation, and membrane processing. J. Food Sci. 55:1147-1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb01619.x
  35. Waldrop, P. W. 2002. Soybean meal in poultry nutrition. Soybean meal infosource. Published by Soybean Growers for the Feed Industry. Available at http://www.soymeal.org/pdf/Infomay2002.pdf
  36. Yoshie-Stark, Y., Y. Wada, M. Schott and A. Wasche. 2006. Functional and bioactive properties of rapeseed protein concentrates and sensory analysis of food application with rapeseed protein concentrates. LWT-Food Sci. Tech. 39:503-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.03.006
  37. Zasoski, R. J. and R. G. Burau. 1977. A rapid nitric-perchloric acid digestion method for multi-element tissue analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 8:425-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627709366735

Cited by

  1. The effect of different dietary levels of canola meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut morphology of broiler chickens vol.93, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03426
  2. Time series livestock diet optimization: cost-effective broiler feed substitution using the commodity price spread approach vol.5, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-017-0094-9