Acceptance of Performance Management System in Local Government

지방자치단체 성과관리제도의 수용성 분석

  • Received : 2011.04.01
  • Accepted : 2011.05.23
  • Published : 2011.05.28


Since legalization of performance management system in Korea Government, it has been very diffused throughout in Local Governments. So it is needed check about acceptance of performance management system. The aim of this paper is to find application for policy and draw up improving the system after analyzing cause of acceptance of performance management system. In summary, it is empirically proven that fair institution, education program and sympathy among employee are needed. Moreover, improving suitable evaluation system for organizational culture and developing manual for drawing KPI are properly required. Improving acceptance of performance management system, reforming performance management system and continuation of the system are guaranteed by Legal.


  1. 고영선, 윤희숙, 이주호, 공공부문의 성과관리, 한국개발연구원, 2004.
  2. 박중훈, 성과평가제도 및 운영실태에 대한 분석과 개선방향, 한국행정연구원, 2004.
  3. 박해육," 지방자치단체 성과관리제도의 비교 및 통합방안", 지방행정연구, 제21권, 제2호, pp.117-149, 2007.
  4. 강황선, 권용수, "조직성과평가결과에 관한 공무원의 수용성 제고방안", 한국행정논집, pp.789-811, 2004.
  5. 하미승, 우은정, "정부기관 BSC의 성과에 대한 진단.평가 연구: 공무원인식을 중심으로", 정책분석평가학회보, 제18권, 제2호, pp.257-292, 2008.
  6. 황성원, 성과관리제도의 수용성 제고방안에 관한 연구, KIPA 연구보고서, 2007-32. 2007.
  7. M. Baldrige, 2006 Education Criteria for Performance Excellence. National Quality Program. 2006.
  8. Carrol, Barbara W. and Dewar, David, "Performance Measurement: Panacea or Fool's Gold, Dunn, Christopher(ed.). The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration, Toronto: Oxford University. 2002.
  9. Hoffmann. Performance Management: Systeme und Implementierungwansatze. 1999.
  10. Kelman, Steven, "Improving Service Delivery Performance in the United Kingdom: Organization Theory Perspectives on Central Intervention Strategies," Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Vol.8, No.4, 2006.