DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010

계량정보학의 지적구조 분석 연구: 2001-2010년 연구영역 분석

Lee, Jae-Yun;Choi, Sang-Hee
이재윤;최상희

  • Received : 2011.05.17
  • Accepted : 2011.06.12
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

Since the 1990s, informetrics has grown in popularity among information scientists. Today it is a general discipline that comprises all kinds of metrics, including bibliometrics and scientometrics. To illustrate the dynamic progress of this field, this study aims to identify the structure and infrastructure of the informetrics literature using statistical and profiling methods. Informetrics literature was obtained from the Web of Knowledge for the years 2001-2010. The selected articles contain least one of these keywords: informetrics', bibliometrics', scientometrics', webometrics', and citation analysis.' Noteworthy publication patterns of major countries were identified by a statistical method. Intellectual structure analysis shows major research areas, authors, and journals.

Keywords

informetrics;intellectual structure;keywords profiling;journal profiling;author profiling

References

  1. Bar-Ilan, J. 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century: A review." Journal of Informetrics, 2(1): 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001
  2. Brookes, B. C. 1990. "Biblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics? What are we talking about?" In Informetrics 89/90. Selection of Papers Submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics, Amsterdam, edited by L. Egghe, R. Rousseau. Netherlands: Elsevier, 31-43.
  3. Garfield, E. E. 1955. "Citation indexed for science-new dimension in documentation through association of ideas." Science, 122(3159): 108-111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
  4. Glanzel, W. and U. Schoepflin. 2001. "Two decades of SCIENTOMETRICS." Scientometrics, 50(2): 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010577824449
  5. Godin, B. 2005. "Measurement and statistics on science and technology: 1920 to the present." Proceedings of the 11th DIS Annual Conference 2010, 2nd-3rd September, Richardsbay, University of Zululand, South Africa.
  6. Hirsch, J. E. 2005. "An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46): 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  7. Hood, W. W. and C. S. Wilson. 2001. "The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics." Scientometrics, 52(2): 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
  8. Kim, Hee-Jeon and Hyun-Yang Cho. 2010. "A study on intellectual structure using author co-citation analysis and author bibliographic coupling analysis in the field of social welfare science." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3): 283-306. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.283
  9. Lee, Jae Yun. 2006a. "Towards a new method for examining current domestic intellectual structure of knowledge domains." Proceeding of the 13th Annual Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 145-152.
  10. Lee, Jae Yun. 2006b. "A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4): 215-231. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215
  11. Lee, Jae Yun. 2006c. "Centrality measures for bibliometric network analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(3): 191-214. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.3.191
  12. Lee, Jae Yun. 2007. "Making a science map of Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 24(3): 363-383. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.3.363
  13. Lee, Jae Yun. 2008. "Bibliographic author coupling analysis: A new methodological approach for identifying research trends." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(1): 173-190. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.1.173
  14. Lee, Jae Yun, Hee-Jeon Kim, and Jong-Duk Ryoo. 2010. "Examining the intellectual structure of housing studies in Korea with text mining and factor analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(2): 285-308. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.2.285
  15. Lee, Jae Yun, Heejung Kim, and Pan Jun Kim. 2010. "Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods." Journal of Information Science, 36(2): 144-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509353251
  16. Lee, Jae Yun, Pan Jun Kim, Dae-Shin Kang, Heejung Kim, So-Young Yu, and Woo Hyoung Lee. 2011. "Bibliometric analysis on LED research trends." Journal of Informaton Management, submitted.
  17. Morris, Steven A. and Betsy Van der Veer Martens. 2008. "Mapping research specialties." Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42: 213-295. Edited by Blaise Cronin. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  18. Ryoo, Jong-duk and Eun-Ju Choi. 2011. "A comparison test on the potential utility between Author Profiling Analysis (APA) and Author Co-Citation Analysis (ACA)." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1): 123-144. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.123
  19. Schvaneveldt, R. W. (ed.) 1990. Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  20. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M. 1992. "An introduction to informetrics." Information Processing & Management, 28(1): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(92)90087-G
  21. White, Howard D. and Belver C. Griffith. 1981. "Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  22. Wouters, P. 1999. 'The Citation culture.' Ph.D dissertation. Department of Science Dynamics, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Amsterdam.

Cited by

  1. Profiling and Co-word Analysis of Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language Domain vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195
  2. A Bibliometric Analysis on Twitter Research vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.293
  3. A Comparative Study on the Centrality Measures for Analyzing Research Collaboration Networks vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.153
  4. Collaboration Networks and Document Networks in Informetrics Research from 2001 to 2011: Finding Influential Nations, Institutions, Documents vol.30, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.179
  5. Ego-centered Topic Citation Analysis on Folksonomy Research Documents vol.29, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.4.295
  6. An Analysis of the Intellectual Structure of the LIS Field: Using Journal Co-citation Analysis vol.24, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.099
  7. Improved Multidimensional Scaling Techniques Considering Cluster Analysis: Cluster-oriented Scaling vol.29, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.2.045
  8. Detecting Research Trends in Korean Information Science Research, 2000-2011 vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.215
  9. Exploring a Researcher's Personal Research History through Self-Citation Network and Citation Identity vol.29, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.157
  10. Calculating the h-index and Its Variants Considering the Number of Authors in a Paper vol.33, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.007
  11. A Comparison Study on the Weighted Network Centrality Measures of tnet and WNET vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241