Effective Analysis of Dicyclanil in Lamb and Chicken Muscle using HPLC-UV / Vis and LC / MS / MS

s: The authors describe a method for monitoring dicyclanil levels in lamb and chicken muscle tissues. The devised procedure involves dicyclanyl extraction by SPE and its detection HPLC-UV/Vis and LC/MS/MS. The method was found to have LOD and LOQ values of 0.02 mg kg−1 and 0.05~0.06 mg kg−1, respectively. The intraday precision and an accuracy of spiked samples were found to have 2.3~10.4 RSD% and 80.9~105.7%, respectively.


Introduction
2] However, the improper use of these drugs can leave residues in tissues, which can lead to health problems for human who consumes the animal products.Dicyclanil (Figure 1) is a pyrimidine-derived insect growth regulator that is used by veterinarians to prevent myiasis or fly-strike, [3][4] but the presence of residual dicyclanil, has received much attention because it has become a consumer safety issue.The Korean Food and Drug Administration had established a maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.15 mg/kg of dicyclanil in sheep and chicken muscle.
The development of simple and rapid methods for the determination of dicyclanil levels in sheep and chicken muscle meat has become increasing important.Few methods have been devised for dicyclanil determination, [5][6][7] and those that have been described are based on liquid-liquid extraction.These methods are time-consuming and lack precision.
Here, the authors describe an effective and sensitive preparation method for dicyclanil in sheep and chicken muscle based on SPE (solid phase extraction) followed by HPLC-UV/Vis and LC/MS/MS.

Experimental Reagents, Materials, and Instruments
Dicyclanil standard solution was prepared using high purity reagents purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO).Organic solvents, such as methanol, acetonitrile, chloroform, and acetone, were obtained from J. T. Baker (NJ, USA).Heptafluobutyric acid (HFBA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).
The supra 22K centrifuge was purchased from Han-Il Scientific Co. Ltd. (Seoul), GF/B glass filter paper from Whatman (Maidstone, UK), and syringe disc filters (0.45 µm and 13 mm) from Life Sciences (UK).The Oasis HLB (Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance, 200 mg, 6 cc) SPE cartridge used for analyte extraction was purchased from Waters (Milford, Massachusetts), and the concentrator was a TurboVap LV nitrogen unit from Caliper Lifescience (Seattle, WA).
An Agilent 1100 series HPLC system (Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a binary pump was connected to an Agilent G1313A autosampler and G1313A UV-Vis detector.The analytical column used was a reverse-phase CAPCELL PAK C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size).Mobile phase A (20 mM HFBA) and phase B (methanol:acetonitrile = 1:1.8)were used with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.Separation was achieved using the following linear gradient system: A:B = 75:25 (v/v), 3  Confirmatory analysis was performed using an Agilent 1200 series HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a sample auto injector (Agilent 1200 series Autosampler) and an Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer.Nitrogen was used as the desolvation gas (gas flow 10 L/min at 350 o C) and the capillary voltage was set at 3.5 kV under the condition of ESI (+) mode.
Analyses were carried out in MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) mode.The first step for analyzing the standards was to monitor the full scan of the mass spectrum under the scan mode.The precursor ion of each analyte is selected in order for perfect collision energy which leads to following product ions.And multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was then performed by the selected characteristic ions.

Sample preparation
Samples (10 g) were homogenized using a mechanical homogenizer, treated with acetonitrile (10 mL), shaken for 30 min at 250 rpm, and centrifuged for 15 min at 3500 rpm.Collected supernatants were mixed with 1 mL of distilled water, evaporated to 1 mL using a nitrogen evaporator at 60 o C, and then 4 mL of distilled water was added.The samples (5 ml) were then loaded into Oasis HLB (200 mg, 6 cc) cartridges conditioned with 8 ml of methanol/DI water (1:1 vol/vol), and eluted with 5 mL methanol (twice).Eluants were completely vaporized in a nitrogen evaporator at 60 o C, and residues were dissolved in 200 µL of solvent and then filtered through a 0.45 µm disk filter for LC/UV-vis and LC/MS/MS analysis.

Chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry
It is difficult to retain dicyclanil in chromatographic reversed-phase mode, and therefore, a chromatographic mode based on the ion pair mode (heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA)) was used.Dicyclanil was detected at 9.2 min using the reversed-phase liquid chromatographic system without any derivatization procedure.
LC/MS/MS analysis was used to confirm the detection of dicyclanil.The same HPLC conditions were used for LC/MS/MS and HPLC-UV/Vis.The mass spectrometer was operated in positive electrospray mode, and conditions were for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM).Full scan and collision induced dissociation (CID) tests were performed for MRM (Figure 2).The protonated molecular ion m/z 191 [M+H] + of dicyclanil The methods to determine LOD and LOQ values are described below.The LOD was assumed from the instrumental analysis of standard solution of dicyclanil, and samples (n = 7) were prepared at a concentration of 1-5 times the LOD.
After calculating standard deviations (σ) and the slope (m) of the linear calibration curve using the results of 7 replicate, LOD and LOQ were found to be 3 σ/m and 10 σ/m, respectively.As a result, the LOD and LOQ in lamb muscle were both between 0.02 mg kg −1 and 0.05 mg kg −1 , respectively, and LOD and LOQ in chicken muscle were both between 0.02 mg kg −1 and 0.06 mg kg −1 , respectively.These LOQs were above the MRL of the KFDA for chicken and lamb muscle.
To analyze residual analyte in samples, samples were spiked with standard solutions at a concentration of LOQ ~6 times of MRLs.Analytes were then extracted by the established analytical method.Calibration curves were obtained for the external standard method and the correlation coefficients for both drugs and matrices were reasonable (r 2 = 0.998; Figure 3).
The accuracy and precision (expressed as RSD%) in the concentration range 0.05~0.9mg kg −1 in spiked lamb muscles were 96.1~112.4% and 1.0~5.4%,respectively.The accuracy and precision for dicyclanil in the concentration range 0.060 .9mg kg −1 in spiked chicken muscles were 80.9~102.5% and 2.5~10.4%,respectively.These results were well within the recommended acceptable values of −30% to +20% at each concentration (Table 1).

Conclusion
The analytical method devised to detectdicyclanil in chicken and lamb muscle using HPLC/UV-Vis and LC/MS/MS was found to be sensitive, reliable, and reproducible.
In chicken and lamb muscle, the LOD and LOQ were 0.02 mg kg −1 and 0.05~0.06mg kg −1 , respectively, and the intraday precision and accuracy of spiked samples were 2.31 0.4 RSD% and 80.9~105.7%,respectively.The described method satisfies the maximum residue limits (MRLs) of the Korean Food Code and has been used to analyze dicyclanil in chicken and lamb muscle by the Korean government and private laboratories.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Calibration curves for the determination of dicyclanil in lamb and chicken muscle.