From Skills to Practice: How Does Information Literacy Happen?

  • Lloyd, Annemaree (School of Information Studies, Charles Sturt University)
  • Received : 2010.08.31
  • Accepted : 2011.05.23
  • Published : 2011.05.30


The use of a practice perspective in the analysis of information literacy represents a shift in attention towards the enactment of information literacy as a social practice, and away from the information skills approach that has dominated information literacy research and education. The sociocultural perspective that underpins a practice-oriented approach highlights the role of practice and co-participation of the community in shaping the production, reproduction and circulation of knowledge, including knowledge about the appropriateness of information skills in relation to the context in which the skills are practised. This emerging view contrasts with the conventional approach to information literacy that has focused on the information skills of individuals as something that can be learned and transferred independently of context. This paper explores two questions: what is information literacy and, how does it happen? It then goes on to identify the implications of this approach for librarians and researchers.


Information Literacy;Information Landscape;Knowledge and Information;Information Modalities


  1. Barad, K. 1996. Meeting the universe halfway. In J. Nelson & L. Hankinson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp.161-194). Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  2. Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an ecology of the mind. San Francisco: Jason Aronson Inc.
  3. Bevan, F. 2003. Developing Information literacy In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Developing Vocational Expertise (pp.110-134). Crows Nest Australia: Allen & Unwin.
  4. Blackler, F. 1995. Knowledge, Knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization studies, 16(6): 1021-1046.
  5. Boon, S., Johnston, B., & Webber, S. 2007. A phenomenographic study of English faculty's conceptions of information literacy. Journal of Documentation, 63(2): 204-228.
  6. Bruce, C. 1997. The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
  7. Bruce, C. 2000. Information literacy research; Dimensions of the emerging collective consciousness. Australian Academic Research Libraries, 31(2): 91-109.
  8. Bruce, C., Edwards, S., & Lupton, M. 2007. Six frames for information literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the relationship between theory and practice. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and Challenge: Information literacy for the 21st century (pp.37-58). Blackwood South Australia: Auslib Press Pty Ltd.
  9. Bundy, A. 2004. Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, standards and practice (2nd ed.): Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy. Retreived 26th March 2010 from .
  10. Catts, R. 2005. Confirming the Relational Model of Information Literacy. The International Information and Library Review, 37(1): 19-24.
  11. Catts, R., & Lau, J. 2008. UNESCO. Information for All Programme (IFAP). Towards Information Literacy Indicators. France: UNESCO.
  12. Delors, J. (Chair) 1996. "Learning: the treasure within." Report to Unesco of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-First Century, Unesco Publishing, Paris.
  13. Doyle, C. 1992. Outcomes measures for information literacy within the National Education goals of 1990. Final report to the national forum on informaiton literacy. Summary of findings ED351 033. Syracuse, N.Y.: Eric Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
  14. Edwards, S. 2006. Panning for gold: Information literacy and the net lenses model. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
  15. Gheradi, S. 2009. Introduction: The critical power of the 'practice lens'. Management Learning, 40(2): 115-128.
  16. Hepworth, M., & Smith, M. 2008. Workplace Information literacy for administrative staff in higher education. Australian Library Journal, 57(3): 212-236.
  17. Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. 2008. Situation Praxis in Practice. In S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling Praxis (pp.37-62). Rotterdam: Sense Pub.
  18. Limberg, L. 2000. Is there a relationship between information seeking and learning outcomes? In C. Bruce & Candy.P. (Eds.), Information literacy around the world: Advances in programs and research (pp.193-208). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
  19. Limberg, L., & Sundin, O. 2006. Teaching information seeking:relating information literacy education to theories of information behaviour. Information Research, 12(1).
  20. Lloyd, A. 2003. Information literacy: the metacompetency of the knowledge economy; an exploratory paper. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(2): 87-92.
  21. Lloyd, A. 2005. Information literacy; different contexts, different concepts, different truths? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37(2): 82-88.
  22. Lloyd, A. 2006a. Drawing from others; Ways of knowing about information literacy performance. Paper presented at the Lifelong Learning: Parnters, pathways and pedagogies. Keynote and refereed papers from the 4th International Lifelong learning conference, (pp.182-192). Rockhampton: Central Queensland.
  23. Lloyd, A. 2006b. Information literacy landscapes: An emerging picture. Journal of Documentation, 62(5): 570-583.
  24. Lloyd, A. 2007. Learning to put out the red stuff: becoming information literate through discursive practice. Library Quarterly, 77(2): 181-198.
  25. Lloyd, A. 2009. Informing practice: information experiences of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice. Journal of Documentation, 65(3): 396-419.
  26. Lloyd, A. 2010a. Framing information literacy as information practice: site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2): 245-258.
  27. Lloyd, A. 2010b. Information literacy landscapes: Information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Oxford, UK.: Chandos.
  28. Lupton, M. 2004. The learning connection: Information literacy and the student experience. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
  29. Palmer, S., & Tucker, B. 2004. Planning, delivery and evaluation of informaiton literacy training for engineering and technology students. Australian Academic Reserach Libraries, March, 13-33.
  30. Palmer, C.L. & Cragin, M.H. 2008. Scholarly and disciplinary practices. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42: 165-212.
  31. Savolainen, R. 2007. Information behaviour and information practice; Reviewing the 'umberella concepts' of information seeking studies. Library Quarterly, 77(2): 109-132.
  32. Schatzki, T. 1996. Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Schatzki, T. 2001. Introduction: The practice turn. In S. T, K. Knorr Cetina & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp.1-14). London: Routledge.
  34. Schatzki, T. 2002. The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Presss.
  35. Schatzki, T. 2006. On Organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27, 1863-1873.
  36. Scheeres, H., Solmon, N., Boud, D., & Rooney, D. 2010. When is it OK to learn at work? The learning work of organisational pratices. Jouranl of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2): 13-26.
  37. Talja, S., & Lloyd, A. 2010. Integrating theories of learning, literacies and information practices. In A. Lloyd & S. Talja (Eds.), Practising Information Literacy: Bringing theories of learning, practice and information literacy together (pp.ix-xx). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Information Studies.
  38. Zurkowski, P. 1974. The information service environment: Relationships and Priorities. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, Washington DC, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, ED 100391.