DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Qualitative Exploration of Folksonomy Users' Tagging Behaviors

폭소노미에 따른 웹 분류 연구 - 이용자 태깅 행위 분석을 중심으로 -

  • 박희진 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2011.01.17
  • Accepted : 2011.01.31
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

This study aims to explore how users are tagging in order to utilize a folksonomy and whether they understand the social and interactive aspects of tagging in three different folksonomic systems, Connotea (www.connotea.org), Delicious(http://delicious.com), and CiteULike(www.citeulike.org). The study uses internet questionnaires, qualitative diary studies, and follow-up interviews to understand twelve participants' tagging activities associated with folksonomic interactions. The flow charts developed from the twelve participants showed that tagging was a quite complex process, in which each tagging activity was interconnected, and a variety of folksonomic system features were employed. Three main tagging activities involved in the tagging processes have been identified: item selection, tag assignment, and tag searching and discovery. During the tag assignment, participants would describe their tagging motivations related to various types of tags. Their perception of the usefulness of types of tags was different when their purpose was for social sharing rather than personal information management. While tagging, participants recognized the social potential of a folksonomic system and used interactive aspects of tagging via various features of the folksonomic system. It is hoped that this empirical study will provide insight into theoretical and practical issues regarding users' perceptions and use of folksonomy in accessing, sharing, and navigating internet resources.

Keywords

Folksonomy;Tagging Behavior;Information Foraging Theory;Information Scent;Internet Classification

References

  1. 김동숙, 정연경. 2010. 폭소노미 태그의 생성과 성장에 관한 연구: Librarything을 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4): 203-230.(Kim, Dong-Suk & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung. 2010. “A Study on creation and development of folksonomy tags on librarything.” Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(4): 203-230.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.203
  2. 김성희, 이형미. 2009. 디지털화 문화유산 태그의 패턴 및 특성 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(3): 171-185.(Kim, Seong-Hee & Lee, Hyungmi. 2009. “Analysis of characteristics and patterns of tags in digitized cultural heritage.” Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(3): 171-185.)
  3. 박태연, 김성희. 2009. 리소스 유형에 따른 태그의 특성 및 기능 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(4): 327-351.(Park, Tae-Yeon & Kim, Seong-Hee. 2009. “An analysis of the characteristics and function of tags based on resource types.” Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(4): 328-351.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.327
  4. 이성숙. 2008. 대학도서관 폭소노미 태그의 형태적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4): 463-480.(Lee, Sung-Sook. 2008. “A study on form of folksonomy tags in university libraries.” Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4): 463-480.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.4.463
  5. 이성숙, 정서영. 2009. 국내 도서관 폭소노미 태그의 일반적 패턴 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(1): 137-150.(Lee, Sung-Sook & Jeong, Seo-Young. 2009. “A study on the general patterns of folksonomy tag for the university libraries.” Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(1): 137-150.)
  6. 조재인. 2008. 한국정보서비스의 폭소노미 분석 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4): 95-112.(Cho, Jane. 2008. “An analysis of the folksonomy constructed at research information service and future perspectives.” Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4): 95-112.)
  7. Barsalou, L. W. 1983. “Ad hoc categories.” Memory & Cognition, 11(3): 211-227. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196968
  8. Chi, E. H., Pirolli, P., Chen, K, & Pitkow, J. 2001. “Using information scent to model user information needs and actions on the web.” CHI-CONFERENCE, 3(1): 490-497.
  9. Choo, C. & Turnbull, D. 2000. “Information seeking on the web: An integrated model of browsing and searching.” FirstMonday, 5(2). [online]. [cited. 2011.1]..
  10. Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  11. Fu, W. & Priolli, P. 2007. “SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the World Wide Web.” Human Computer Interaction, 22(4): 355-412.
  12. Golder, S. A. & Humberman, B. A. 2006. “Usage patterns of collaborative tagging system.” Journal of Information Science, 32(2): 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506062337
  13. Guy, M. & Tonkin, E. 2006. “Folksonomies: Tidying up tags?” D-Lib Magazine, 12(1). [online]. [cited. 2011.1]. .
  14. Hjorland, B. 2003. “Fundamentals of knowledge organization.” Knowledge Organization, 30(2): 87-111.
  15. Iyer, H. 1995. Classificatory Structures: Concepts, Relations and Representation. Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
  16. Jacob, E. K. 2004. “Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference.” Library Trends, 52(3): 515-540.
  17. Jacob, E. K. 1991. “Classification and categorization: Drawing the line. In B. H. Kwasnik and R. Fidel, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd ASIS SIG/CR Classification Workshop, 67-83.
  18. Jacoby, J. 2005. “Optimal foraging.” In K. Fisher et al., eds. Theory of Information Behavior, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc, 257-264.
  19. Kalbach, J. 2000. “Designing for information foragers: A behavioral model for information seeking on the World Wide Web.” Internetworking, 3(3). [online]. [cited. 2011.1]. .
  20. Kipp, M. 2007. “@Toread and cool: Tagging for time, task and emotion.” Paper presented at the 8th Information Architecture Summit, Las Vegas. [online]. [cited 2011.1]. .
  21. Kipp, M. & Campbell, D. 2006. “Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging practices: An examination of tagging practices.” In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1-18.
  22. Kwasnik, B. 1999. “The Role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery.” Library Trends, 48(1): 22-47.
  23. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
  24. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.
  25. Marlow, C. et al. 2006. “HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read.” In Proceeding of the 17th Conference on Hypertext & hypermedia. New York, NY: ACM Press. [online]. [cited 2011.1]. .
  26. Mathes, A. 2004. “Folksonomies: Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata.” [online]. [cited 2011.1]. .
  27. Meho, L. & Tibbo, H. 2003. “Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists:Ellis’s study revisited.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6): 570-587. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10244
  28. Murphy, G. 2002. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  29. Pirolli, P. & Fu, W. 2003. “SNIF-ACT: A model of information foraging on the World Wide Web.” In P. Brusilovsky et al. eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling, 45-54.
  30. Pirolli, P. & Card , S. 1999. “Information foraging.” Psychological Review, 106(4): 643-675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643
  31. Pirolli, P. et al. 2005. "Information scent and web navigation: Theory, models, and automated usability evaluation." In Proceedings of Human Computer International 22-27 July 2005 Las Vegas, NV, USA. [online]. [cited 2011.1]..
  32. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  33. Voss, J. 2006. “Collaborative thesaurus tagging in the Wikipedia way.” Wikimetrics research papers, 1(1). [online]. [cited 2011.1]. .