For the Deconstruction of the History of Western Architecture as a Discourse - A Reflection on the Education of the Architectural History in Korea -

우리 서양건축사 교육의 반성 - 담론으로서 '서양건축사'를 해체하기 위하여 -

  • 강혁 (경성대학교 건축학부)
  • Received : 2011.08.10
  • Accepted : 2011.11.28
  • Published : 2011.12.31

Abstract

This study is on the pedagogical convention of architectural history in Korea, especially that of Western Architecture. Recent institutional change in architectural school in Korea has caused overall restructuring of academic program. In spite of extension in the field of history there was no progress of method and way of thinking. There is no change in the point of view to see the western architecture and its history as a unique and specialized phenomenon in the civilization of mankind. Because of no recognition about for what, for whom, and how to, and because of orientalism, the cultural position of western architectural history and its narrative was not asked. With the help of post-colonialism, de-constructivism and critical historiography this paper tries to show the fundamental premise of western architectural history as a myth and show its prejudice as not being justifiable. The background of the discourse there has been a representation effect with regard to knowledge as a power. we need to escape from this kind of cognitional frame With the analysis of the its premise and narrative we can find it is a historical construct that was made in the age of imperialism. In fact it has a lot of false information and problematic point of view. The Identity and originality of western architecture and its history has no logical reason or foundation if we think that it depends on the difference and comparison with other civilization. For example the explanation of its historical origin western architecture has big difference with Islamic architecture in spite of the resemblance each other. This paper try to show several reasons that discourse of western architectural history can not be survived any longer. So we need to reconstruct new pedagogy with deconstruction for the students of non western, or Korean students. Because it has important effect to see and think about architecture and its history.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 경성대학교

References

  1. 한국서양사학회(편), 유럽중심주의 세계사를 넘어 세계사들로, 푸른역사, 2009
  2. 주경철, 대항해시대, 해상팽창과 근대세계의 형성, 서울대출판문화원, 2008
  3. 강혁, 서구 근대건축사의 기술과 해석에 관한 연구, 서울대대학원 박사논문, 1992
  4. 임석재, 서양건축사: 기독교와 인간, 북하우스
  5. 이성형, 콜럼부스가 서쪽으로 간 까닭은, 까치글방, 2003
  6. How Not to Teach Architectural History, JAE, Vol. 34, No. 1, Fall, 1980
  7. Critical Historiography and End of Theory, JAE, Vol. 52, No.4, May., 1999
  8. "Orientalism", Design Book Review, Issue 29/30, Summer/Fall, 1993
  9. P. Pyla, Historizing Pedagogy: A Critique of Kostof's A History of Architecture , JAE, V. 52, N.4, 1999
  10. D. Watkin, 우동선 역, 건축사학사, 시공사, 1997
  11. B. Zevi, 강혁 역, 공간으로서의 건축(Architecture as Space), 집문사, 1989(1974)
  12. Van de Ven, 고성룡 역, 건축공간론(Space in Architecture), 기문당, 1987(1980)
  13. S. Kostof, A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1985
  14. M. Jarzombek, F. Ching, V. Prakash, A Global History of Architecture, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007
  15. D. P. Crouch, History of Architecture: Stonehenge to Skyscrapers, Mc Grow-Hill, NY., 1985
  16. M. Tranchtenberg, Architecture:From Prehistory to Post-Modernism, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., NY., 1986
  17. Sir B. Fletcher, A History of Architecture, Ed. by J. Musgrove, Butterworths, London, 1987
  18. G. B. Nalbontoglu, W. C. Tai, ed., Postcolonial space(s), Princeton Architectural Press, NY., 1997
  19. P. Nuttgens, 윤길순 역, 건축이야기 (The Story of Architecture ), 동녘출판사, 2001
  20. K. Jenkins, 최용찬 역, 누구를 위한 역사인가(Rethinking History), 혜안, 1999(1991)
  21. R. F. Jordan, A History of Western Architecture, Thames and Hudson, 1969
  22. E. H. Gombrich, "In Search of Cultural history" in Ideals and Idol, Oxford, Phaidon Press, 1979
  23. G. Winke, 이한우 역, 가다머의 철학적 해석학, 사상사, 1993
  24. J. Glancey, 강주헌 역, 건축의 역사(The Story of Architecture), 시공사, 2002
  25. K. M. Hays, Architectural Theory since 1968, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1998
  26. M. Tafuri, 김일현 역, 건축의 이론과 역사, 동녘, 2009
  27. J. Fontana, 김원중 역, 거울에 비친 유럽, 새물결, 2000
  28. Z. Bauman, 이일수역, 액체 근대(Liquid Modernity), 강, 2005(2000)
  29. W. Bejamin, 반성완 편역, 발터 벤야민의 문예이론, 민음사, 1983
  30. E. W. Said, 박홍규 역, 오리엔탈리즘(Orientalism), 교보문고, 1992
  31. M. Foucault, 이정우역, 지식의고고학(L'archeologie du savoir ), 민음사, 1992(1969)
  32. J. Derrida, 박성창 역, 입장, 솔, 1993
  33. L. Gandhi, 이영욱 역, 포스트식민주의란 무엇인가(Postcolonial Theory), 현실문화연구, 2000(1998)
  34. R. J. Young, 김택현 역, 포스트식민주의 또는 트렌스컨티넨탈리즘(Postcolonialism), 박종철출판사, 2005(2001)
  35. R. J. Young, 김용규 역, 백색신화: 서양이론과 유럽중심주의 비판, 경성대학교 출판부, 2008
  36. E. Hobsbawm, 박지향 역, 만들어진 전통(The Invention of Tradition), 휴머니스트, 2004(1983)
  37. A. G. Frank, 이희재 역, 리오리엔트(Reorient), 이산, 2003(1998)
  38. J. M. Blaunt, 박광식 역, 역사학의 함정: 유럽중심주의를 비판한다.(Eight Eurocentric Historians), 푸른숲, 2008(2000)
  39. J. M. Blaut, 김동택 역, 식민주의자의 세계 모델(The Colonizer's Model of the World), 성균관대학교 출판부, 2008(1993)
  40. 가라타니 고진, 조영일 역, 언어와 비극, 도서출판 b, 2004
  41. V. E. Taylor, 김용규 외 역, 포스모더니즘 백과사전, 경성대학교 출판부, 2007(2001)
  42. J. D. Hoeg, Islam Architecture, Rizzoli, 1987(1975)
  43. H. Sterlin, Islam, V.1, Taschen, 1996
  44. Hasan-Uddin Khan, International Style, Tschen, 1998