DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Making Cloze Tests More Valid

클로즈 테스트의 효율성 높이기

  • 박정열 (나사렛대학교 오웬스국제대학)
  • Received : 2010.11.18
  • Accepted : 2010.02.10
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate ways of making the cloze test more valid as an English proficiency test so that it can provide a better format for the cloze test especially to the non-native teachers in EFL environments. This investigation identifies ways of validity in terms of materials, deletion rates, item characteristics and scoring methods used in cloze tests. An increase in test validity can be accomplished by knowing how the four factors affect the cloze test results and how to manipulate them. Practical suggestions are provided for teachers to design a cloze test. Teachers can develop the reliability and validity of cloze tests by manipulating the four factors. In seeking a more valid and reliable cloze format, this research gives some suggestions based on a literature review. We can conclude that a cloze test can be valid only when teachers are aware of the factors which affect the test result and the ways to handle the factors to make the test appropriate for their test purposes.

Keywords

English Proficiency Test;Reliability;Validity;EFL Environment

References

  1. Abraham, R., G., & Chapelle, C., A., The meaning of cloze test scores: an item difficulty perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), pp.468-479, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/330047
  2. Alderson, J. C., The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 13, pp.219-223, 1979. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586211
  3. Bachman, L. F., Performance on cloze tests with fixed ratio and rational deletions. TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.535-556, 1985. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586277
  4. Bachman, L. F., Language testing-SLA research interfaces. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.177-195, 1998.
  5. Brown, J. D., What are the characteristics of natural cloze tests? Language Testing, 10, pp.93-116, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000201
  6. Brown, J. D., Cloze item difficulty. JALT Journal, 11, pp.46-67, 1989.
  7. Chihara, T., Sakurai, T., & Oller, J. W. Jr. Background and culture as factors in EFL reading comprehension. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Jonz., J. (Eds.), Cloze and coherence, London: Associated University press, pp.135-147, 1989.
  8. Green, B. B., Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with cloze. Journal of Research in Reading 24(1), pp.82-98, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00134
  9. Han, M., EFL Readers' Test-taking Processes for Completion vs. Multiple Choice Cloze Tests. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 15(3), pp.189-208, 2007.
  10. Huges, A., Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  11. Kobayashi, M., Cloze tests revisited: exploring item characteristics with special attention to scoring methods. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), pp.571-586, 2003.
  12. Oller, J. W. Jr. Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in English as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 74, pp.151-157, 1983.
  13. Sasaki, M., Effects of cultural schemata on students' test-taking processes for cloze tests: a multiple data source approach. Language Testing, 17(1), pp.85-114, 2000.
  14. Stubbs, J., & Tucker, G .R., The Cloze Test as a Measure of English Proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 58, pp.239-241, 1974. https://doi.org/10.2307/325020
  15. Yuet, C., Cultural content and reading proficiency: A comparison of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong learners of English. Language, Culture & curriculum, 16(1), pp.60-69, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310308666657