AN IV CATHETER FRAGMENTS DURING MDCT SCANNING OF HUMAN ERROR: EXPERIMENTAL AND REPRODUCIBLE MICROSCOPIC MAGNIFICATION ANALYSIS

  • Kweon, Dae-Cheol (Department of Radiologic Science, Shin Heung College) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Woong (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang-dong) ;
  • Choi, Ji-Won (Department of Radiological Science, Jeonju University) ;
  • Yang, Sung-Hwan (Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Korean National College of Rehabilitation and Welfare) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health College University) ;
  • Chung, Woon-Kwan (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2011.11.14
  • Accepted : 2011.12.05
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

The use of intravenous catheters are occasionally complicated by intravascular fragments and swelling of the catheter fragments. We present a patient in whom an intravenous catheter fragments was retrieved from the dorsal metacarpal vein following its incidental CT examination detection. The case of demonstrates the utility of microscopy and multi-detector CT in localizing small of subtle intravenous catheter fragments as a human error. A case of IV catheter fragments in the metacarpal vein, in which reproducible and microscopy data allowed complete localization of a missing fragments and guided surgery with respect to the optimal incision site for fragments removal. These reproducible studies may help to determine the best course of action and treatment for the patient who presents with such a case.

References

  1. Powell CC, Li JM, Rodino L, Anderon FA. A new device to limit extravasation during contrast.enhanced CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:315-318. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740315
  2. Benson LS, Sathy MJ, Port RB. Forearm compartment syndrome due to automated injection of computed tomography contrast material: Case report. J. Orthop. Trauma 1996;10:433-436. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199608000-00012
  3. Shannon FL, McCroskey BL, Moore EE, Moore FA. Venous bullet embolism: rationale for mandatory extraction. J. Trauma 1987;27:1118-1122.
  4. Gschwind CR. The intravenous foreign body: A report of 2 cases. J. Hand Surg. 2002;27A:350-354.
  5. Leunens G, Verstraete J, Van den Bogaert W, Van Dam J, Dutreix A, Van der Schueren E. Human errors in data transfer during preparation and delivery of radiation treatment affecting the final result: garbage in, garbage out. Radiother. Oncol. 1992;23(4):217-222.
  6. Yoo BG, Kweon DC, Lee JS, Jang KJ, Yang SH, Kim YS. Comparison radiation dose of z.axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current multi.detector row CT scanning of lower extremity venography. J. Radiat. Protect. 2007;32(3):123-133.
  7. Gabelmann A, Kramer S, Gorich J. Percutaneous retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:1509-1513. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761509
  8. Vadlamani P, Dawn B, Perry MC. Catheter fragments and embolization from totally implanted venous access ports. Angiology 1998;49:1013-1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/000331979804901207
  9. Weiss CR, Fishman EK. Multidetector 3D CT of pulmonary embolism of a peripheral intravenous line. Emerg. Radiol. 2005;11:247-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0393-9
  10. Kweon DC, Yoo BG, Yang SH, Kim JG. Findings of an intravenous catheter fragments in the vein using the 3D image reformations of MDCT. Korean J. Med. Phys. 2006;17:167-172.
  11. Gulcu N, Karaaslan K, Kandirali E, Kocoglu H. Detection of a retained epidural catheter fragment. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2006;31:589-590. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200611000-00026
  12. Lee SY, Na HS, Kim MH, Kim CS, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Do SH. A sheared catheter fragment in the wrist after arterial cannulation attempt: a case report. Korean J. Crit. Care. Med. 2010;25(2):118-121. https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2010.25.2.118