A Study on Suggestion for KCR and KORMARC by Analyzing Work and Expression Element of RDA in MARC

MARC 데이터의 RDA 저작 및 표현형 요소 분석을 통한 한국목록규칙 및 KORMARC의 고려사항

  • 이미화 (한성대학교 학생지원팀)
  • Received : 2010.05.21
  • Accepted : 2010.06.25
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Resource Description and Access(RDA) was published in 2008, reflecting IFLA IME ICC's International Cataloguing Principles(ICP), conceptual model for cataloging of Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records(FRBR), and conceptual model for authority data of Functional Requirement for Authority Data(FRAD). Therefore, new tags and fields have been added to MARC21 format, and researches about the prototype have been studied to implement FRBR as envisioned by the new RDA standard. According to the innovative international cataloging environments, KCR and KORMARC must be revised to accommodate RDA description. This study was to grasp occurrence rate of work and expression element of FRBR and RDA among MARC field of Hansung University library and to analyze limitation of MARC data for RDA. Based on this limitations, cataloging rules and tags and fields of KORMARC were suggested to accommodate RDA in national cataloging environment. This study reviewed cataloging rules such like representation, main entry and rule of three, preferred title, types of content, media and carrier. This study is to suggest the consideration of KCR and KORMARC for RDA in Korea.

References

  1. Ed Jones, "The Shape of things to come: Resource Description and Access(RDA)," Serials Librarian, Vol.52, No.3/4(2007), pp.281-289.
  2. Alison Hitchens and Ellen Symons, "Preparing catalogers for RDA Training," Cataloging & classification Quarterly, Vol.47(2009), pp.691-707.
  3. IME ICC, 영미권의 차세대 목록규칙 자원의 기술과 접근, 도서관연구소 역, 2009, [cited 2010. 3. 2].
  4. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA, RDA: Resource Description and Access, 2008, [cited 2009. 12. 23].
  5. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA, FRBR to RDA mapping, 2009, [cited 2009. 12. 23].
  6. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. RDA to FRBR mapping, 2009, [cited 2009. 12. 23].
  7. Tom Delsey, "FRBR and FRAD as implemented in RDA," Presented at ALCTS Preconference RDA, 2009, [cited 2010. 4. 23].
  8. 조재인, "RDA 구현 시나리오와 서지제어의 장래에 대한 고찰," 한국문헌정보학회지, 제43권, 제3호(2009. 9), pp.85-105.
  9. Jan Pisanski and Maja Zumer, "Functional requirements for bibliographic records: an investigation of two prototypes," Program: electronic library and information system, Vol.41, No.4(2007), pp.400-417.
  10. Matthew Mayernik, "The Distributions of MARC Fields in Bibliographic Records," Library Resources Technical Services, Vol.54, No.1(2010), pp.40-54.
  11. William E. Moen, "Data-driven evidence for core MARC records," Presented at NISO Webinar(2009), [cited 2010. 4. 23].
  12. Karen Smith-Yoshimura, et. al., Implicatons of MARC tag usage on library metadata practices(Ohio : OCLC, 2010).
  13. Barbara B. Tillet, "Changes from AACR2 for texts," Presented at ABA Supervisors' Forum, 2009, [cited 2010. 4. 23].
  14. Lynne C. Howarth and J. Weihs, "Enigma Variations: parsing the riddle of main entry and the rules of three from AACR2 to RDA," Cataloging & classification Quarterly, Vol.46, No.2(2008), pp.201-220.
  15. Jean Weihs and Lynne C. Howarth, "Uniform titles from AACR to RDA," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol.64, No.4(2008), pp.362-384.
  16. Philip Hider, "A Comparison between the RDA Taxonomies and End-User categorizations of content and carrier," Cataloging & classification Quarterly, Vol.47(2009), pp.544-560.