- Volume 11 Issue 5
DOI QR Code
The Effects of R&D Public Subsidies on Service Firms' Innovation Activities
연구개발 공적보조금이 서비스기업의 혁신활동에 미치는 영향
- Kim, Sang-Sin (Division of Economics, The University of Seoul)
- 김상신 (서울시립대학교 경제학과)
- Received : 2010.02.18
- Accepted : 2010.05.13
- Published : 2010.05.31
During the last year, public expenditures which provided the central and local governments for boosting research and development (R&D) activities of the private sector has been constantly increasing. 17 percent of public total R&D expenditure supported to private sector and 9 percent of R&D expenditure in service sector were public R&D funding. However, studies evaluating the impact of public R&D subsidies are quite few. The aim of this study empirically investigate the average effects of public R&D subsidies on the innovation activities in private sector, specifically those engaged in Korean service firms by using Propensity Score Matching(PSM) method. The effect of R&D subsidies is derived from either qualitative and quantitative outcomes of innovation activities, which is defined as the difference between innovation outcome of the treatment group (receiving R&D subsidies) and that of the control group (non receiving R&D subsidies) after the matching method. As a result of empirical analysis, government R&D grants stimulate only firm-first innovation outcomes in service firms. It is represent that public R&D subsidies cannot be contributed to level of national innovation and the total amount of national innovation activities but can enhance firm competitiveness from increasing firm-first innovation activities.
- Choi, S. J, Kim, S. S, "The Analysis for effect on Government R&D Subsidies by using PSM" unpublished manuscript, 2009.
- Czarnitzki, D., Licht, G., "Additionality of Public R&D Grants in a Transition Economy: the Case of Eastern Germany", Economics of Transition 14(1), 101-131, 2005.
- David, P. and Hall, B., "Heart of Darkness: Modeling Public-Private Funding Interactions Inside the R&D Black Box.", Research Policy, (29)9, 1165-1183, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00085-8
- Dehejia, H. and Wahba, S, "Casual Effects in Non-Experimentra Studies: Re-Evaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs,", Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol94, No.448, 1053-1062, 1997.
- OECD, Proposal Guideline for Measuring and Interpreting Technology Innovation Data - The Oslo Manual, Third Edition, 2005.
- Rosenbaum, Paul and Rubin, Donald, "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrika, Vol.70, No.1:41-55, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
- 과학기술부, 과학기술연구개발활동조사보고서, 2003-2009, 각 년도.
- 과학기술정책연구원, 2006년도 한국의 기술혁신조사: 서비스부문, 2006.
- 권남훈.고상원, "기업 R&D 투자에 대한 정부 직접보조금의 효과", 국제경제연구, 제10권, 제2호, 2004.
- 김상신, "정부 연구개발 보조금의 기업자체 연구개발 투자에 대한 효과분석", 서울시립대학교, 석사학위논문.
- 최석준.김상신, "성향점수 매칭을 이용한 정부 연구개발 보조금 효과분석", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 10, 1, 200, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2009.10.1.200
- Aerts, K., and Schmidt, T., "Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies : A comparison between Flanders and Germany", Research Policy, 37, 806-822, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.011
- Blanes. J.V, Busom. I, "Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms", Research Policy, (33), 1459-1497, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.006
- Berube. C, Mohnen. P, "Are Firms That Received R&D Subsidies More Innovative?", CIRANO, 2007.