DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Improvement and Evaluation of the Flight Suit Pattern to Enhance Movement

동작성 향상을 위한 비행복의 패턴개선 및 평가

  • Jeon, Eun-Jin (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Sei-Kwon (Dept. Industrial Engineering Air Force Academy) ;
  • You, Hee-Cheon (Dept. of Industrial & Management Engineering, POSTECH) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Eun (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Kyungpook National University)
  • 전은진 (경북대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 박세권 (공군사관학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 유희천 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 김희은 (경북대학교 의류학과)
  • Received : 2010.03.04
  • Accepted : 2010.04.01
  • Published : 2010.10.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new flight suit in bilateral ways; subjectively and objectively in the improvements of comfort and mobility. Seven healthy males at the age of twenties volunteered in this wearing test. They were over 177 cm in height and 92-95 cm in chest circumference, which satisfies the M95 Special' size described in the Korean Military Specifications and Standards. The subjective satisfaction was evaluated according to the criteria of ease of donning and doffing, fitness of wear, mobility, space between cloth and body, convenience in using restroom. Subjective satisfaction evaluation says that the best improvement of movement are neck circumference, chest breadth, armscye circumference, waist back length, crotch length, crotch height and body rise. According to the evaluation, improvements of mobility were conspicuous especially in parts of body like neck, breast, waist, back, and arms. When evaluating objective satisfaction, we measured a angle difference in a prescribed standard-grid on a photograph that picked up while the subject performed each motion in front of 10 cm-interval grid. As a result, the motion that had angle difference above 5 degrees were arm stretching and standing on single leg holding at forward or at his side. Bending necks and waist, crouching also had angle difference of over 5 degrees. The improvements are discussed from the viewpoint that the increased ease in parts of armscye circumference and crotch in new flight suit pattern.

Keywords

flight suit pattern;subjective satisfaction;objective satisfaction;improvement of movement

References

  1. 강순희. (1973). 피부신축에 따른 작업복 구성에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 논문집, p. 8, p. 629.
  2. 강여선, 성화경, 최혜선, 이경화. (2006). 성인남자용 의류 치수체계 개발을 위한 신체치수 분석(제1보). 한국의류학회지, 30(8), 1199-1209.
  3. 권상희, 하지수. (2006). 현대 군복 디자인에 대한 연구. 한국복식학회지, 56(9), 143-156.
  4. 김영희. (2007). 자동차정비작업복의 기능적 디자인 연구. 한국의류학회지, 31(4), 531-539. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.4.531
  5. 김영희. (2008). 하지 동작에 적합한 남성복 슬랙스의 밑위길이 여유분 설정에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 32(4), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.4.553
  6. 나미향, 장경진, 이연순. (1997). 오버롤형 방진복의 패턴설계에 관한 연구. 한국생활과학회지, 6(2), 121-131.
  7. 박선형, 우승정, 이영신, 최의중, 김현준, 이주현. (2005). 미래병사체계를 위한 스마트 전투복의 프로토타입 디자인 -제1보-. 감성과학회지, 8(3), 277-290.
  8. 이은정. (2002). 상지 동작에 따른 길의 변화에 관한 연구(제2보) -사선방향의 변화를 중심으로-. 한국의류산업학회지, 4(2), 145-155.
  9. 이혜진, 최혜선. (2002). 운전 자세에 적합한 기능적 슬랙스 설계에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 26(11), 1514-1526.
  10. 임지영, 김혜경. (2000). 여중생의 하반신 유형별 슬랙스 원형설계 및 착의 평가에 관한 피복 인간공학적 연구. 한국의류학회지, 24(8), 1125-1136.
  11. 임현주, 최혜선, 이경미, 김수아. (2006) 항공 정비복 착용실태에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 30(9/10), 1344-1353.
  12. 장지혜, 정희자, 김은경. (1999). 군복의 적합성에 관한 연구. 생활과학, 2, 217-234.
  13. 조희림 (1996). 자동차 정비 작업복에 관한 태도 연구. 성신여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  14. 최지숙, 최혜선, 이경미. (2003). 육군전투복의 기능성 향상을 위한 연구. 한국복식학회지, 53(5), 141-153.
  15. Adams, P. S., & Keyserling, W. M. (1993) Three methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing : A comparative study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 12(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(93)90024-8
  16. Ashdown, S. P., & Watkins, S. M. (1996). Concurrent engineering in the design of protective clothing : interfacing with equipment design, in Johnson, J. S. and Mansdorf, S.Z. (Eds.), Preformance of Protective Clothing, ASTM : PA.
  17. Ducharme, M. B. (2006). Heat stress of helicopter aircrew wearing immersion suit. Industrial Health, 44(3), 433- 440. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.44.433
  18. Faerevik, H., & Reinertsen, R. E. (2003). Effects of wearing aircrew protective clothing on physiological and cognitive responses under various ambient conditions. Ergonomics, 46(8), 780-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000085644
  19. Gaul C. A., & Mekjavic, I. B. (1987). Helicopter pilot suit for offshore application - A survey of thermal comfort and ergonomic design -. Applied Ergonomics, 18(2), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90209-2
  20. Huck, J. (1988) Protective clothing systems: A technique for evaluating restriction of wearer mobility. Applied Ergonomics, 19(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(88)90136-6
  21. Huck, J., Maganga, O., & Kim, Y. (1997). Protective overalls: evaluation of garment design and fit. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 9(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/09556229710157876

Cited by

  1. A Study on Wearing Satisfaction and Thermal Properties of Jumper for Korean Military Tank Drivers vol.14, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.2.261
  2. Analysis of Pattern Shape and Types for Non-woven Protective Coverall on Domestic Market vol.40, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2016.40.2.273